Just Sustainability? Sustainability and Social Justice in Professional Codes of Ethics for Engineers
- Cletus S. Brauer
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Should environmental, social, and economic sustainability be of primary concern to engineers? Should social justice be among these concerns? Although the deterioration of our natural environment and the increase in social injustices are among today’s most pressing and important issues, engineering codes of ethics and their paramountcy clause, which contains those values most important to engineering and to what it means to be an engineer, do not yet put either concept on a par with the safety, health, and welfare of the public. This paper addresses a recent proposal by Michelfelder and Jones (2011) to include sustainability in the paramountcy clause as a way of rectifying the current disregard for social justice issues in the engineering codes. That proposal builds on a certain notion of sustainability that includes social justice as one of its dimensions and claims that social justice is a necessary condition for sustainability, not vice versa. The relationship between these concepts is discussed, and the original proposal is rejected. Drawing on insights developed throughout the paper, some suggestions are made as to how one should address the different requirements that theory and practice demand of the value taxonomy of professional codes of ethics.
- American Society of Civil Engineers. (2010) . Code of ethics. Reston, Virginia, USA: ASCE Press.
- Barry, B. (1999) . Sustainability and Intergenerational Justice. In: A. Dobson (Ed.), Fairness and futurity: Essays on environmental sustainability and social justice (pp. 93–117). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Catalano, G. (2006a). Engineering ethics: Peace, justice, and the earth. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.
- Catalano, G. (2006b). Engineering in a morally deep world: applications and reflections. In Paper presented at the 113th annual ASEE conference and exposition. Chicago, IL.
- Crawford, E. (1999). The women’s suffrage movement: A reference guide, 1866–1928. London: UCL Press.
- Davis, M. (2003). What can we learn by looking for the first code of professional ethics? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 25(5), 433–454.
- Davis, M. (2007). Eighteen rules for writing a code of professional ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(2), 171–189. CrossRef
- Fawcett, M. G. (1920). The women’s victory and after: Personal reminiscences 1911–1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Frankel, M. S. (1989). Professional codes: Why, how, and with what impact? Journal of Business Ethics, 8(2–3), 109–115. CrossRef
- Howarth, R. B. (1995). Sustainability under uncertainty: A deontological approach. Land Economics, 71(4), 417–427. CrossRef
- Leopold, A. (1949). A sand county almanac. New York: Oxford University Press.
- McShane, K. (2007). Anthropocentrism vs. nonanthropocentrism: Why should we care? Environmental Values, 16, 169–185. CrossRef
- Michelfelder, D. & Jones, S. A. (2010). Sustaining engineering codes of ethics for the 21st Century [slides]. Presented at the inaugural 2010 forum on philosophy, engineering, and technology (fPET) conference at the colorado school of mines; golden, CO, USA. Retrieved from [http://www.slideshare.net/philengtech/sharon-jonesdianemichelfelderfpet-2010slideshare].
- Michelfelder, D. & Jones, S. A. (2011). Sustaining codes of ethics for the twenty-first century. Science and Engineering Ethics. published online September 23, 2011.
- Mihelcic, J., Crittenden, J., Small, M., et al. (2003). Sustainability science and engineering: Emergence of a new metadiscipline. Environmental Science and Technology, 37(23), 5314–5324. CrossRef
- Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. Inquiry, 16, 95–100. CrossRef
- Norton, B. G. (1991). Toward unity among environmentalists. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Norton, B. G. (2003) . Environmental ethics and weak anthropocentrism. In A. Light & H. Rolston III (Eds.), Environmental ethics. An anthology. Blackwell Philosophy Anthologies (pp. 163–174). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
- Sandler, R. (2007). Character and environment: A virtue-oriented approach to environmental ethics. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Singer, P. (1993). Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- United Nations. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. General Assembly Resolution 42/187, December 11, 1987.
- United Nations. (2005). 2005 world summit outcome. General Assembly Resolution A/60/1, September 15, 2005.
- van de Poel, I., & Royakkers, L. M. M. (2010). Ethics and technology. Oxford: Blackwell.
- van Wensveen, L. (2000). Dirty virtues: The emergence of ecological virtue ethics. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
- Weston, A. (2003) . Beyond Intrinsic value: Pragmatism in environmental ethics. In A. Light & H. Rolston III (Eds.), Environmental ethics. An anthology. Blackwell Philosophy Anthologies (pp. 307–318). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
- Just Sustainability? Sustainability and Social Justice in Professional Codes of Ethics for Engineers
Science and Engineering Ethics
Volume 19, Issue 3 , pp 875-891
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Professional codes of ethics
- Engineering ethics
- Paramountcy clause
- Social justice
- Cletus S. Brauer (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy and Ethics, School of Innovation Sciences; 3TU.Centre for Ethics and Technology, Eindhoven University of Technology, IPO 1.10, PO Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands