Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 775–797

Self-Plagiarism in Academic Publishing: The Anatomy of a Misnomer

Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s11948-012-9416-1

Cite this article as:
Andreescu, L. Sci Eng Ethics (2013) 19: 775. doi:10.1007/s11948-012-9416-1

Abstract

The paper discusses self-plagiarism and associated practices in scholarly publishing. It approaches at some length the conceptual issues raised by the notion of self-plagiarism. It distinguishes among and then examines the main families of arguments against self-plagiarism, as well as the question of possibly legitimate reasons to engage in this practice. It concludes that some of the animus frequently reserved for self-plagiarism may be the result of, among others, poor choice of a label, unwarranted generalizations as to its ill effects based on the specific experience (and goals) of particular disciplines, and widespread but not necessarily beneficial publishing practices.

Keywords

Self-plagiarismDuplicate publicationSalami publicationInformational noiseAcademic publishingAcademic ethicsCopyright infringement

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Spriu Haret University, BucharestDistrict 3, BucharestRomania