Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.
Anderson, M. S., Horn, A. S., Risbey, K. R., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007). What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists’ misbehavior? Findings from a national survey of NIH-funded scientists. Academic Medicine,
Antes, A. L., Brown, R. P., Murphy, S. T., Waples, E. P., Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., et al. (2007). Personality and ethical decision-making in research: The role of perceptions of self and others. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics,
Arnaud, A. (2010). Conceptualizing and measuring ethical work climate: Development and validation of the ethical climate index. Business & Society,
Clayton, S., & Opotow, S. (2003). Justice and identity: Changing perspectives on what is fair. Personality and Social Psychology Review,
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology,
Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments (U.S.), National Research Council (U.S.), United States. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health. Office of Research Integrity. (2002). Integrity in scientific research: Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Council of Canadian Academies, The Expert Panel on Research Integrity. (2010). Honesty, accountability and trust: Fostering research integrity in Canada. Ottawa, ON: Council of Canadian Academies.
Council of Graduate Schools. (2011). Project for scholarly integrity (WWW document)
Crain, A. L., Martinson, B. C., Ronning, E. A., McGree, D., Anderson, M. S., & DeVries, R. (2008). Supplemental sampling frame data as a means of assessing response bias in a hierarchical sample of university faculty. In Presented at annual meetings of the American Association for public opinion research, New Orleans, LA.
Crain, A. L., Martinson, B. C., Thrush, C. R., (2012). Relationships between the survey of organizational research climate (SORC) and self-reported research practices. Journal of Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-012-9409-0
Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). NIH guide for grants and contracts: Announcement of final PHS policy on instruction in the responsible conduct of research
Department of Health and Human Services. (2001). NIH guide for grants and contracts: Notice of suspension of PHS policy
DuBois, J. M., Anderson, E. E., Carroll, K., Gibb, T., Kraus, E., Rubbelke, T., et al. (2012). Environmental factors contributing to wrongdoing in medicine: A criterion-based review of studies and cases. Ethics and Behavior,
Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Geller, G., Boyce, A., Ford, D. E., & Sugarman, J. (2010). Beyond “Compliance”: The role of institutional culture in promoting research integrity. Academic Medicine,
Groves, R. M. (2006). Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly,
Hackett, E. J. (1994). A social control perspective on scientific misconduct. The Journal of Higher Education,
Heitman, E., Anestidou, L., Olsen, C., & Bulger, R. E. (2005). Do researchers learn to overlook misbehavior? Hastings Center Report,
Heitman, E., & Bulger, R. E. (2005). Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content. Accountability in Research,
Integrity and Misconduct in Research: Report of the Commission on Research Integrity. (1995). Commission by U.S. Congress No. U.S. Government Printing Office: 1996-746-425. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.
Irish Council for Bioethics, Rapporteur Group. (2010). Recommendations for promoting research integrity. Dublin: The Irish Council for Bioethics.
Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M., & Donaldson, M. S., (2000). To Err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Landy, F. J., & Conte, J. M. (2010). Work in the 21st century: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology. New York: Wiley.
Leape, L. L. (2010). Transparency and public reporting are essential for a safe health care system. New York: The Commonwealth Fund.
Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., Crain, A. L., & De Vries, R. (2006). Scientists’ perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1
, 51–66. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=16810337
Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & De Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature,
Martinson, B. C., Crain, A. L., Anderson, M. S., & De Vries, R. (2009). Institutions’ expectations for researchers’ self-funding, federal grant holding and private industry involvement: Manifold drivers of self-interest and researcher behavior. Academic Medicine,
Martinson, B. C., Crain, A. L., De Vries, R., & Anderson, M. S. (2010). The importance of organizational justice in ensuring research integrity. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics,
Mumford, M., & Helton, W. B. (2001). Organizational influences on scientific integrity. In: Proceedings of the 2000 ORI conference on research on research integrity (pp. 73–90). Bethesda, MD: Investigating Research Integrity.
Mumford, M. D., Murphy, S. T., Connelly, S., Hill, J. H., Antes, A. L., Brown, R. P., et al. (2007). Environmental influences on ethical decision making: Climate and environmental predictors of research integrity. Ethics and Behavior,
Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research. (1992). Responsible science, Volume I: Ensuring the integrity of the research process. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
Peugh, J. L., & Enders, C. K. (2010). Specification searches in multilevel structural equation modeling: A Monte Carlo investigation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,
Pfeffer, J., & Langton, N. (1993). The effects of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly,
Pimple, K. D. (2002). Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics,
Rennie, D., & Gunsalus, C. K. (2008). What is research misconduct? In F. O. Wells & M. J. G. Farthing (Eds.), Fraud and misconduct in biomedical research. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press.
Schein, E. H. (1991). What is culture? In P. J. Frost, L. F. Moore, M. R. Louis, C. C. Lundberg, & J. Martin (Eds.), Reframing organizational culture (pp. 243–253). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Sovacool, B. (2008). Exploring scientific misconduct: Isolated individuals, impure institutions, or an inevitable idiom of modern science? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry,
Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics,
Steneck, N. H., & Bulger, R. E. (2007). The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine,
Steneck, N., & Mayer, T. (2010). Singapore statement on research integrity (WWW document)
Teitelbaum, M. S. (2008). Research funding: Structural disequilibria in biomedical research. Science,
Thrush, C. R., Vander Putten, J., Rapp, C. G., Pearson, L. C., Berry, K. S., & O’Sullivan, P. S. (2007). Content validation of the Organizational Climate for Research Integrity (OCRI) survey. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics,
Titus, S. L., Wells, J. A., & Rhoades, L. J. (2008). Repairing research integrity. Nature,
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review,
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods,
Wenger, N. S., Korenman, S. G., Berk, R., & Berry, S. (1997). The ethics of scientific research: An analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives. Journal of Investigative Medicine,