Exploring Why and How Journal Editors Retract Articles: Findings From a Qualitative Study
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Editors have a responsibility to retract seriously flawed articles from their journals. However, there appears to be little consistency in journals’ policies or procedures for this. In a qualitative study, we therefore interviewed editors of science journals using semi-structured interviews to investigate their experience of retracting articles. We identified potential barriers to retraction, difficulties in the process and also sources of support and encouragement. Our findings have been used as the basis for guidelines developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics.
- Budd, JM, Sievert, ME, Schulz, TR (1998) Phenomena of retraction. Reasons for retraction and citations to the publications. Journal of American Medical Association 280: pp. 296-297 CrossRef
- Council of Science Editors (CSE). (2009). White paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal publications. Available online at: http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3354#2.1.7. Accessed June 14, 2011.
- Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2011). Code of conduct for editors London: COPE Available online at: http://publicationethics.org/files/Code%20of%20conduct%20for%20journal%20editors_0.pdf. Accessed Feb 18, 2011.
- Errami, M, Hicks, JM, Fisher, W, Trusty, D, Wren, JD, Long, TC, Garner, HR (2008) Déjà vu–a study of duplicate citations in medline. Bioinformatics 24: pp. 243-249 CrossRef
- May, T (1997) Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process. OUP, Buckingham
- Nath, SB, Marcus, SC, Druss, BG (2006) Retractions in the research literature: Misconduct or mistakes?. Medical Journal of Australia 185: pp. 152-154
- Richie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman, R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 173–194). London: Routledge.
- Rogers, G., & Bouey, E. (1996). Collecting your data. In L. M. Tutty, M. Rothery, R. M. Grinnell, Jr. (Eds.), Qualitative research for social workers: Phases, steps, and Tasks, 4th ed. (pp. 50–87). Boston: Ally & Bacon.
- Silverman, D (1999) Doing qualitative research. A practical handbook. Sage, London
- Sox, HC, Rennie, D (2006) Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: Lessons from the Poehlman case. Annals of Internal Medicine 144: pp. 609-613
- Wager, E., Barbour, V., Yentis, S., & Kleinert, S. (2009). Retractions: Guidance from the committee on publication ethics (COPE) Available at: http://publicationethics.org/files/u661/Retractions_COPE_gline_final_3_Sept_09__2_.pdf. Accessed March 21, 2011.
- Williams, P (2005) Using information and communication technology with special educational needs students: The views of frontline professionals. Aslib Proceedings 57: pp. 539-553 CrossRef
- Williams, P, Stevenson, I, Nicholas, D, Watkinson, A, Rowlands, I (2009) The role and future of the monograph in arts and humanities research. Aslib Proceedings 61: pp. 67-82 CrossRef
- Wager, L., & Williams, P. (2011). Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of medline retractions 1988–2008. Journal of Medical Ethics (to be published summer 2011). doi:10.1136/jme.2010.040964 (in-press).
- Exploring Why and How Journal Editors Retract Articles: Findings From a Qualitative Study
Science and Engineering Ethics
Volume 19, Issue 1 , pp 1-11
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Medical research