Scientific Forensics: How the Office of Research Integrity can Assist Institutional Investigations of Research Misconduct During Oversight Review
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The Division of Investigative Oversight within the U.S. Office of Research Integrity (ORI) is responsible for conducting oversight review of institutional inquiries and investigations of possible research misconduct. It is also responsible for determining whether Public Health Service findings of research misconduct are warranted. Although ORI findings rely primarily on the scope and quality of the institution’s analyses and determinations, ORI often has been able to strengthen the original findings by employing a variety of analytical methods, often computer based. Although ORI does not conduct inquiries or investigations, it has broad authority to provide assistance to institutions at all stages of their reviews of allegations. This assistance can range from providing advice on best practices, to legal assistance, to suggestions for how best to investigate specific allegations. When asked, ORI can also conduct certain forensic analyses, such as a statistical examination of questioned digits or a simple examination of a questioned figure in Photoshop. ORI will not provide opinions or render judgment on such analyses while the institution is still conducting its investigation. Such analyses can be done without knowing much else about the case.
Supplementary Material (0)
- Dahlberg, J. E., & Mahler, C. C. (2006). The Poehlman case: Running away from the truth. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 157–173. CrossRef
- Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435(7043), 737–738. CrossRef
- Mosimann, J. E., Dahlberg, J. E., Davidian, N. M., & Krueger, J. W. (2002). Terminal digits and the examination of questioned data. Accountability in Research, 9, 75–92. CrossRef
- Mosimann, J. E., & Ratnaparkhi, M. V. (1996). Uniform occurrence of digits for folded and mixture distributions at finite intervals. Communications in Statistics, 25(2), 481–506.
- Mosimann, J. E., Wiseman, C. V., & Edelman, R. E. (1995). Data fabrication: Can people generate random digits? Accountability in Research, 4, 31–55. CrossRef
- Poehlman, E. T., Toth, M. J., & Gardner, A. W. (1995). Changes in energy balance and body composition at menopause: A controlled longitudinal study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 123(9), 673–675. Retraction in: Sox, H.C. (2003). Annals of Internal Medicine, 139(8), 702.
- Sox, H. C., & Rennie, D. (2006). Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: Lessons from the Poehlman case. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144(8), 609–613.
About this Article
- Scientific Forensics: How the Office of Research Integrity can Assist Institutional Investigations of Research Misconduct During Oversight Review
Science and Engineering Ethics
Volume 16, Issue 4 , pp 713-735
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Research misconduct
- Scientific forensics