Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 75–107

Climate Change, Nuclear Economics, and Conflicts of Interest

Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s11948-009-9181-y

Cite this article as:
Shrader-Frechette, K. Sci Eng Ethics (2011) 17: 75. doi:10.1007/s11948-009-9181-y


Merck suppressed data on harmful effects of its drug Vioxx, and Guidant suppressed data on electrical flaws in one of its heart-defibrillator models. Both cases reveal how financial conflicts of interest can skew biomedical research. Such conflicts also occur in electric-utility-related research. Attempting to show that increased atomic energy can help address climate change, some industry advocates claim nuclear power is an inexpensive way to generate low-carbon electricity. Surveying 30 recent nuclear analyses, this paper shows that industry-funded studies appear to fall into conflicts of interest and to illegitimately trim cost data in several main ways. They exclude costs of full-liability insurance, underestimate interest rates and construction times by using “overnight” costs, and overestimate load factors and reactor lifetimes. If these trimmed costs are included, nuclear-generated electricity can be shown roughly 6 times more expensive than most studies claim. After answering four objections, the paper concludes that, although there may be reasons to use reactors to address climate change, economics does not appear to be one of them.


Atomic energyClimate changeConflicts of interestData-trimmingEconomicsElectricityEnergyGlobal warmingGreenhouse-gas emissionsNuclear powerRenewableSolar photovoltaicWind

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA