Date: 24 Nov 2007
Causal Factors Implicated in Research Misconduct: Evidence from ORI Case Files
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
There has been relatively little empirical research into the causes of research misconduct. To begin to address this void, the authors collected data from closed case files of the Office of Research Integrity (ORI). These data were in the form of statements extracted from ORI file documents including transcripts, investigative reports, witness statements, and correspondence. Researchers assigned these statements to 44 different concepts. These concepts were then analyzed using multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. The authors chose a solution consisting of seven clusters: (1) personal and professional stressors, (2) organizational climate, (3) job insecurities, (4) rationalizations A, (5) personal inhibitions, (6) rationalizations B and, (7) personality factors. The authors discuss the implications of their findings for policy and for future research.
An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9070-9
LaFollette, M. C. (1994). Research misconduct. Society, 31(3), 6–10.CrossRef
Davis, M. S. (2003). The role of culture in research misconduct. Accountability in Research, 11(3), 189–201.CrossRef
Dresser, R. (1993). Defining scientific misconduct: The relevance of mental state. JAMA, 269(7), 895–897.CrossRef
Woolf, P. (1981). Fraud in science. The Hastings Center Report, 11(5), 9–14.CrossRef
Berg, A. O. (1990). Misconduct in science: Does family medicine have a problem? Family Medicine, 22(2), 137–142.
James, W. (1995). Fraud and hoaxes in science. Nature, 377(6549), 474.CrossRef
Lock, S. (1997). Fraud in medical research. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 31(1), 90–94.
Royal College of Physicians (1991). Fraud and misconduct in medical research: causes, investigation and prevention. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 25(2), 89–94.
Weed, D. (1998). Preventing scientific misconduct. American Journal of Public Health, 88(1), 125–129.CrossRef
Dyer, O. (2004). Doctor fabricated research while depressed. BMJ Careers, 329(7473), 996.CrossRef
Broad, W., & Wade, N. (1982). Betrayers of the truth. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Racker, E. (1989). A view of misconduct in science. Science, 339(6220), 91–93.
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Broome, M. E. (2003). Scientific integrity. Nursing Outlook, 51(5), 197–198.CrossRef
Chop, R. M., & Silva, M. C. (1991). Scientific fraud: definitions, policies and implications for nursing research. Journal of Professional Nursing, 7(3), 166–171.CrossRef
Jay, P. (1999). Research misconduct – have we reached a turning point at last? Science and Engineering Ethics, 5(1), 119–122.CrossRef
Lock, S. (1994). Research misconduct: a brief history and a comparison. Journal of Internal Medicine, 235(2), 123–127.CrossRef
Tangney, J. P. (1987). Fraud will out – or will it? New Scientist, 115(1572), 62.
Mumford, M. D., & Helton, W. B. (2002). Organizational influences on scientific integrity. In N. H. Steneck & M. D. Scheetz (Eds.), Investigating research integrity: Proceedings of the first ORI research conference on research integrity. Rockville, MD: Office of Research Integrity.
Davis, M. S., Wester, K. L., & King, B. (In press). Ethical compromises in counseling research: A pilot study of prevalence and correlates. Journal of Counseling & Development.
Goodstein, D. (2002). Scientific misconduct. Academe, 88(1), 18–21.
Fuchs, S., & Westervelt, S. D. (1996). Fraud and trust in science. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 39(2), 248–269.
Morrison, R. S. (1990). Disreputable science: Definition and detection. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 15(8), 911–913.CrossRef
Davis, M. S., & Riske, M. L. (2002). Preventing scientific misconduct: Insights from convicted offenders. In N. H. Steneck & M. D. Scheetz (Eds.), Investigating research integrity: Proceedings of the first ORI research conference on research integrity. Rockville, MD: Office of Research Integrity
Fox, M. F., & Braxton, J. M. (1994). Misconduct and social control in science: Issues, problems, solution. Journal of Higher Education, 65(3), 373–383.CrossRef
James, N., Burrage, J., & Smith, B. (2003). Scientific integrity: A review of The Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) reports. Nursing Outlook, 51(5), 239–241.CrossRef
Hansen, B. C., & Hansen, K. D. (1995). Academic and scientific misconduct: Issues for nursing educators. Journal of Professional Nursing, 11(1), 31–39.CrossRef
Fletcher, S. W., & Fletcher, R. H. (1994). Publish wisely or perish: Quality rather than quantity in medical writing. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 23(6), 799–800.
Jefferson, T. (1998). Redundant publication in biomedical sciences: Scientific misconduct or necessity? Science and Engineering Ethics, 4(2), 135–140.CrossRef
Lynch, A. (1994). Ethics in dental research. Publication of research: The ethical dimension. Journal of Dental Research, 73(11), 1778–1782.
Smith, M. M. (1992). Chiropractic research: The ethics. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 15(8), 536–541.
Whitbeck, C. (1995). Truth and trustworthiness in research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1(4), 403–416.CrossRef
Holaday, M., & Yost, T. E. (1995). A preliminary investigation of ethical problems in publication and research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(2), 281–291.
Mojon-Azzi, S. M., & Mojon, D. S. (2004). Scientific misconduct: from salami slicing to data fabrication. Ophthalmic Research, 36(1), 1–3.CrossRef
Dale, J. A., Schmitt, C. M., & Crosby, L. A. (1999). Misrepresentation of research criteria by orthopaedic residency applicants. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 81(12), 1679–1681.
Frankel, M. S. (1994). Ethics in research: Current issues for dental researchers and their professional society. Journal of Dental Research, 73(11), 1759–1765.
Hernon, P., & Altman, E. (1995). Misconduct in academic research: its implications for the service quality provided by university libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 21(1), 27–37.CrossRef
Wocial, L. D. (1995). The role of mentors in promoting integrity and preventing scientific misconduct in nursing research. Journal of Professional Nursing, 11(5), 276–280.CrossRef
Illingworth, R. (2004). Fraud and other misconduct in biomedical research. British Journal of Neurosurgery, 18(4), 325–327.CrossRef
Meyer, III, W. M. & Bernier, Jr., G. M. (2002). Potential cultural factors in scientific misconduct allegations. In N. H. Steneck & M. D. Scheetz (Eds.), Investigating research integrity: Proceedings of the first ORI research conference on research integrity. Rockville, MD: Office of Research Integrity.
Jones, A. H. (2003). Can authorship policies help prevent scientific misconduct? What role for scientific societies? Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(2), 243–256.CrossRef
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998a). Part I: Methods of collecting and analyzing empirical materials. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative methods (pp. 35–45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: CA: Sage Publications.
von Eckartsberg, R. (1996). Existential-phenomenological research. In E. von Eckartsberg (Ed.), Phenomenological inquiry in psychology: Existential and transpersonal dimensions (pp. 3–61). New York: Plenum Press.
Webster’s II New College Dictionary (1986). New York: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Trochim, W. (1989). An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 87–110.CrossRef
Trochim, W. (1993). Reliability of concept mapping. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association, Dallas, Texas.
Trochim, W. (1989). Concept mapping: Soft science or hard art? Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 1–16.CrossRef
Davis, J. E. (1989). Construct validity in measurement: A pattern matching approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 31–36.CrossRef
Marquart, J. M. (1989). A pattern matching approach to assess the construct validity of an evaluation measurement. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 37–43.CrossRef
Linton, R. (1989). Conceptualizing feminism: Clarifying social concepts. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 25–30.CrossRef
Shern, D. L., Trochim, W. K., & LaComb, C. A. (1995). The use of concept mapping for assessing fidelity of model transfer: An example from psychiatric rehabilitation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 18(2), 143–153.CrossRef
Mannes, M. (1989). Using concept mapping for planning the implementation of a social technology. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 67–74.CrossRef
Wenger, N. S., Korenman, S. G., Berk, R., & Berry, S. (1997). The ethics of scientific research: An analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 45(6), 371–380.
SPSS, I. (2004). SPSS 13.0 for windows. http://www.spss.com
Sykes, G., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.CrossRef
Heitman, E., & Bulger, R. E. (2005). Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content. Accountability in Research, 12(3), 207–224.
- Causal Factors Implicated in Research Misconduct: Evidence from ORI Case Files
Science and Engineering Ethics
Volume 13, Issue 4 , pp 395-414
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Research integrity
- Research misconduct
- Responsible conduct of research
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Criminal Justice Research Center, The Ohio State University, 147 Journalism Building, 242 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
- 2. Justice Research & Advocacy, Inc., Amherst, OH, USA
- 3. College of Human Resources and Education, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA