The Perverse Effects of Competition on Scientists’ Work and Relationships
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Anderson, M.S., Ronning, E.A., De Vries, R. et al. Sci Eng Ethics (2007) 13: 437. doi:10.1007/s11948-007-9042-5
Competition among scientists for funding, positions and prestige, among other things, is often seen as a salutary driving force in U.S. science. Its effects on scientists, their work and their relationships are seldom considered. Focus-group discussions with 51 mid- and early-career scientists, on which this study is based, reveal a dark side of competition in science. According to these scientists, competition contributes to strategic game-playing in science, a decline in free and open sharing of information and methods, sabotage of others’ ability to use one’s work, interference with peer-review processes, deformation of relationships, and careless or questionable research conduct. When competition is pervasive, such effects may jeopardize the progress, efficiency and integrity of science.