Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 157–173

The poehlman case: running away from the truth

Authors

    • Division of Investigative Oversight, Office of Research IntegrityU.S. Department of Health & Human Services
    • Office of the General Counsel, Public Health DivisionU.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11948-006-0016-9

Cite this article as:
Dahlberg, J.E. & Mahler, C.C. SCI ENG ETHICS (2006) 12: 157. doi:10.1007/s11948-006-0016-9

Abstract

Eric T. Poehlman, Ph.D., was an internationally recognized, tenured professor at the University of Vermont (UVM) in Burlington when, in October 2000, a junior member of Poehlman’s laboratory became convinced that he had altered data from a study on aging volunteers from the Burlington area. This suspicion developed into one of the most significant cases of scientific misconduct in the history of the US Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Office of Research Integrity (ORI), launching a US Department of Justice (DOJ) civil and criminal fraud investigation and, eventually, to a much publicized guilty plea and felony conviction. In the end, Dr. Poehlman admitted to 54 findings of scientific misconduct made by the UVM and ORI, agreed to retract or correct ten of his publications and to exclude himself from federal procurement and nonprocurement transactions for life. The United States Government’s handling of this case was distinguished by a highly cooperative approach that integrated the resources of the US Attorney’s Office for the District of Vermont (USAO) and both ORI and the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) in HHS in the common goal of prosecuting research fraud.

Keywords

scientific misconductlifetime debarmentcriminal fraudgerontology researchmenopause transition

Copyright information

© Opragen Publications 2006