Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 25–34

From case management to prevention of scientific dishonesty in Denmark

Authors

  • Daniel Andersen
    • The Danish Committee on Scientific DishonestyDanish Research Agency
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11948-000-0019-x

Cite this article as:
Andersen, D. SCI ENG ETHICS (2000) 6: 25. doi:10.1007/s11948-000-0019-x
  • 58 Views

Abstract

In 1992, The Danish Medical Research Council established a national committee on scientific dishonesty with the twofold task of handling cases of scientific misconduct and taking preventive initiatives. Scientific dishonesty was proven in only five cases, but in another nine cases lesser degrees of deviations from good scientific practice were found. The experiences from a total of 24 treated cases indicated that three key areas were at the basis of most of the accusations and the deviations from good practice: uncertainty about 1) authorship, about 2) rights and duties to use scientific data and about 3) agreements at the initiation of joint studies. As a consequence guidelines on good practice have been issued on these key subjects.

Keywords

authorshipgood scientific practiceguidelinesrights to use scientific datascientific fraudstorage of scientific data
Download to read the full article text

Copyright information

© Opragen Publications 2000