Management of Stenosis of the Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery: Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty and Stenting
- Kevin M. BarrettAffiliated withDepartment of Neurology-Cannaday 2E, Mayo Clinic Florida Email author
- , Thomas G. BrottAffiliated withDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Florida
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Recent randomized clinical trial data support the safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid occlusive disease. Endarterectomy is more effective in preventing stroke, but this may be countered by a higher risk of perioperative myocardial infarction. Age is an important determinant in selecting patients for either carotid endarterectomy or stenting. Patients older than 70 years achieve better outcomes with endarterectomy, and younger patients achieve better outcomes with stenting. Comparative clinical and anatomic durability of endarterectomy and stenting will require additional follow-up from recently completed trials. The efficacy of carotid revascularization compared with modern medical therapy in asymptomatic patients remains an important and unanswered clinical question.
- Management of Stenosis of the Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery: Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty and Stenting
Current Treatment Options in Neurology
Volume 12, Issue 6 , pp 475-482
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Current Science Inc.
- Additional Links