Dual implantation of penile and sphincter implants in the post-prostatectomy patient
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Despite major improvement in surgical techniques for radical pelvic surgery, including radical prostatectomy, major quality-of-life issues persist, such as postoperative erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence. These two conditions have many common etiologies and often occur in the same patient. Patients with either of these conditions fail initial conservative or minimally invasive therapy and become candidates for prosthetic implants, such as artificial urinary sphincter and penile prosthesis. In the past three decades, there have been significant improvements in the mechanical properties of these devices, their functional capabilities, and surgical implantation techniques. Studies once suggested that implantation of both devices in one patient could lead to failure, but recent literature proves that patients benefit from simultaneous dual implantation. Specific benefits relate to shorter surgery time, with potentially lower infection rates. In this manuscript, we review the indications, techniques, merits, and safety of simultaneous dual implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter and penile prosthesis in the post-radical prostatectomy patient.
- Hussain M, Greenwell TJ, Venn SN, Mundy AR: The current role of the artificial urinary sphincter for the treatment of urinary incontinence. J Urol 2005, 174:418–424. CrossRef
- Klingler HC, Marberger M: Incontinence after radical prostatectomy: surgical treatment options. Curr Opin Urol 2006, 16:60–64.
- Bryan DE, Mulcahy JJ, Simmons GR: Salvage procedure for infected noneroded artificial urinary sphincters. J Urol 2002, 168:2464–2466. CrossRef
- Ficazzola MA, Nitti VW: The etiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence and correlation of symptoms with urodynamic findings. J Urol 1998, 160:1317–1320. CrossRef
- Majoros A, Bach D, Keszthelyi A, et al.: Urinary incontinence and voiding dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy (prospective urodynamic study). Neurourol Urodyn 2006, 25:2–7. CrossRef
- Desautel MG, Kapoor R, Badlani GH: Sphincteric incontinence: the primary cause of post-prostatectomy incontinence in patients with prostate cancer. Neurourol Urodynam 1997, 16:153–160. CrossRef
- Steiner MS, Morton RA, Walsh PC: Impact of anatomical radical prostatectomy on urinary continence. J Urol 1991, 145:512–514.
- Catalona WJ, Carvalhal GF, Mager DE, Smith DS: Potency, continence and complication rates in 1870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 1999, 162:433–438. CrossRef
- Montague DK, Angermeier KW: Postprostectomy urinary incontinence: the case for artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Urology 2000, 55:2–4. CrossRef
- Dubbelman YD, Dohle GR, Schroder FH: Sexual function before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a systematic review of prognostic indicators for a successful outcome. Eur Urol 2006, 50:711–718. CrossRef
- Wille S, Heidenreich A, Hofmann R, Engelmann U: Preoperative erectile function is one predictor for post prostatectomy incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2007, 26:140–143 CrossRef
- Kendirci M, Gupta S, Shaw K, et al.: Synchronous prosthetic implantation through a transscrotal incision: an outcome analysis. J Urol 2006, 175:2218–2222. CrossRef
- Parulkar BG, Barrett DM: Combined implantation of artificial sphincter and penile prosthesis. J Urol 1989, 142:732–735.
- Graham SD Jr, Carson CC 3rd, Anderson EE: Long-term results with the Kaufman prosthesis. J Urol 1982, 128:328–330.
- Wilson SK, Delk JR: A new approach for implantation of artificial urinary sphincter: upper transverse scrotal incision. J Urol 2001, 165:256. CrossRef
- Wilson SK, Delk JR, Henry GD, Siegel AL: New surgical technique for sphincter urinary control system using upper transverse scrotal incision. J Urol. 2003, 169:261–264. CrossRef
- Sellers CL, Morey AF, Jones LA: Cost and time benefits of dual implantation of inflatable penile and artificial urinary sphincter prosthetics by single incision. Urology 2005, 65:852–853. CrossRef
- Abouassaly R, Angermeier KW, Montague DK: Risk of infection with an antibiotic coated penile prosthesis at device replacement for mechanical failure. J Urol 2006, 176:2471–2473. CrossRef
- Blomgren G, Lindgren U: The susceptibility of total joint replacement to hematogenous infection in the early postoperative period: an experimental study in the rabbit. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980, 151:308–312.
- Wilson SK, Delk JR: Inflatable penile implant infection: predisposing factors and treatment suggestions. J Urol 1995, 153:659–661. CrossRef
- Licht MR, Montague DK, Angermeier KW, Lakin MM: Cultures from genitourinary prostheses at reoperation: questioning the role of Staphylococcus epidermidis in periprosthetic infection. J Urol 1995, 154:387–390. CrossRef
- Dual implantation of penile and sphincter implants in the post-prostatectomy patient
Current Urology Reports
Volume 8, Issue 6 , pp 477-481
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Current Science Inc.
- Additional Links