Strategies for improving pneumococcal vaccination in eligible patients
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Despite the fact that invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae remains a leading cause of death, current levels of immunization in the at risk population remain low and well below the 90% goal for Healthy People 2010. A number of intervention strategies to increase immunization rates (for influenza and pneumonia) have been demonstrated to be effective in increasing these rates when used alone or in combination. A summary of this literature is presented including recent data on the effectiveness of pay-for-performance approaches for increasing preventive care. Data are also presented on intervention strategies judged to be most effective in a large health care system, the Veterans Health Administration, which has essentially reached the Healthy People 2010 goal for pneumococcal immunization.
- Messonnier ML, Corso PS, Teutsch SM, et al.: An ounce of prevention...what are the returns? Second edition 1999. Am J Prev Med 1999, 16:248–263. CrossRef
- Robinson KA, Baughman W, Rothrock G, et al.: Epidemiology of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae infections in the United States, 1995–1998: opportunities for prevention in the conjugate vaccine era. JAMA 2001, 285:1729–1735. CrossRef
- Christenson B, Lundbergh P, Hedlund J, Ortqvist A: Effects of a large-scale intervention with influenza and 23-valent pneumococcal vaccines in adults aged 65 years or older: a prospective study. Lancet 2001, 357:1008–1011. CrossRef
- Coffield AB, Maciosek MV, McGinnis JM, et al.: Priorities among recommended clinical preventive services. Am J Prev Med 2001, 21:1–9. CrossRef
- Sisk JE, Moskowitz AJ, Whang W, et al.: Cost-effectiveness of vaccination against pneumococcal bacteremia among elderly people. JAMA 1997, 278:1333–1339. CrossRef
- Neumann PJ, Levine BS: Do HEDIS measures reflect cost-effective practices? Am J Prev Med 2002, 23:276–289. CrossRef
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Public health and aging: influenza vaccination coverage among adults aged > or =50 years and pneumococcal vaccination coverage among adults aged > or =65 years — United States, 2002. MMWR 2003, 52:987–992.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2004. [www.cdc.gov/brfss/index.htm]
- Pham HH, Schrag D, Hargraves JL, Bach PB: Delivery of preventive services to older adults by primary care physicians. JAMA 2005, 294:473–481. CrossRef
- Zaza S, Briss PA, Harris KW (eds.): The Guide to Community Preventive Services: What Works to Promote Health? Oxford University Press; 2005. A very comprehensive review of studies to improve vaccination coverage based on rigorous study selection and review criteria.
- Briss PA, Rodewald LE, Hinman AR, et al.: Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to improve vaccination coverage in children, adolescents, and adults. Am J Prev Med 2000, 18(Suppl 1):97–140. CrossRef
- Task Force on Community Preventive Services: Recommendations regarding interventions to improve vaccination coverage in children, adolescents, and adults. Am J Prev Med 2000, 18(Suppl 1):92–96.
- Ndiaye SM, Hopkins DP, Shefer AM, et al.: Interventions to improve influenza, pneumococcal polysaccharide, and hepatitis B vaccination coverage among highrisk adults: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2005, 28(Suppl 5):248–279. CrossRef
- Jacobson Vann JC, Szilagyi P: Patient reminder and recall systems to improve immunization rates. Cochrane Datab Syst Rev 2005, 3:1–50. A very comprehensive review of studies to improve vaccination coverage by means of patient recall and reminder systems based on rigorous study selection and review criteria.
- Terrell-Perica SM, Effler PV, Houck PM, et al.: The effect of a combined influenza/pneumococcal immunization reminder letter. Am J Prev Med 2001, 21:256–260. CrossRef
- Smith DM, Zhou XH, Weinberger M, et al.: Mailed reminders for area-wide in.uenza immunization: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999, 47:1–5.
- Stone EG, Morton SC, Hulscher ME, et al.: Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Int Med 2002, 136:641–651.
- Maglione MA, Stone EG, Shekelle PG: Mass mailings have little effect on utilization of in.uenza vaccine among Medicare bene.ciaries. Am J Prev Med 2002, 23:43–46. CrossRef
- Kane RL, Johnson PE, Town RJ, Butler M: A structured review of the effect of economic incentives on consumers’ preventive behavior. Am J Prev Med 2004, 27:327–352. CrossRef
- Nexoe J, Kragstrup J, Ronne T: Impact of postal invitations and user fee on in.uenza vaccination rates among the elderly: a randomized controlled trial in general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care 1997, 15:109–112. CrossRef
- Town R, Kane R, Johnson P, Butler M: Economic incentives and physicians’ delivery of preventive care: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2005, 28:234–240. CrossRef
- Fairbrother G, Hanson KL, Friedman S, Butts GC: The impact of physician bonuses, enhanced fees, and feedback on childhood immunization coverage rates. Am J Pub Health 1999, 89:171–175.
- Fairbrother G, Siegel MJ, Friedman S, et al.: Impact of financial incentives on documented immunization rates in the inner city: results of a randomized controlled trial. Ambul Pediatr 2001, 1:206–212. CrossRef
- Hillman AL, Ripley K, Goldfarb N, et al.: The use of physician financial incentives and feedback to improve pediatric preventive care in Medicaid managed care. Pediatrics 1999, 104:931–935. CrossRef
- Kouides RW, Bennett NM, Lewis B, et al.: Performancebased physician reimbursement and influenza immunization rates in the elderly. Am J Prev Med 1998, 14:89–95. CrossRef
- Hillman AL, Ripley K, Goldfarb N, et al.: Physician financial incentives and feedback: failure to increase cancer screening in Medicaid managed care. Am J Public Health 1998, 88:1699–1701.
- Grady KF, Lemkau JP, Lee NR, Caddell C: Enhancing mammography referral in primary care. Prev Med 1997, 26:791–800. CrossRef
- Rosenthal MB, Frank RG, Zhonghe L, Epstein AM: Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice. JAMA 2005, 294:1788–1793. A good example of how well-designed field research can be conducted in the area of pay-for-performance. CrossRef
- Dudley RA: Pay-for-performance research: how to learn what clinicians and policy makers need to know. JAMA 2005, 294:1821–1823. A succinct summary of the many challenges of pay-for-performance research including study design, selecting theory-driven hypotheses, reporting research findings, and setting research priorities. CrossRef
- Epstein AM, Lee TH, Hamel MB: Paying physicians for high-quality care. N Engl J Med 2004, 350:406–410. CrossRef
- Rashidian A, Black N, Russell I: Financial incentives and quality improvement. Qual Saf Health Care 2005, 14:227.
- American College of Physicians: Linking physician payments to quality care. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians, 2005. Position Paper.
- Rosenthal MB, Fernandopulle R, Song HR, Landon B: Paying for quality: providers’ incentives for quality improvement. Health Affairs 2004, 23:127–141. CrossRef
- Perlin JB, Kolodner RM, Roswell RH: The Veterans Health Administration: quality, value, accountability, and information as transforming strategies for patient-centered care. Am J Manag Care 2004, 10:828–836.
- Jha AK, Perlin JB, Kizer KW, Dudley RA: Effect of the transformation of the Veterans Health Care System on the quality of care. N Engl J Med 2003, 348:2218–2227. CrossRef
- Warner EA, Seleznick MJ: Using medical record reminders to improve pneumococcal vaccination rates. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 2004, 30:331–334.
- Steinberg EP: Improving the Quality of Care-can we practice what we preach? N Engl J Med 2003, 348:2681–2683. CrossRef
- Poon EG, Jha AK, Christino M, et al.: Assessing the level of healthcare information technology adoption in the United States: a snapshot. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2006, 6:1–26. CrossRef
- Garg AX, Adhikari NKJ, McDonald H: Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes. JAMA 2005, 293:1223–1238. CrossRef
- Dexter PR, Perkins SM, Maharry KS, et al.: Inpatient computer-based standing orders vs physician reminders to increase influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates: a randomized trial. JAMA 2004, 292:2366–2371. CrossRef
- Coyle CM, Currie BP: Improving the rates of inpatient pneumococcal vaccination: impact of standing orders versus computerized reminders to physicians. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004, 25:904–907. CrossRef
- Fung CH, Woods JN, Asch SM, et al.: Variation in implementation and use of computerized clinical reminders in an integrated healthcare system. Am J Manag Care 2004, 10:878–885.
- Schellhase KG, Koepsell TD, Norris TE: Providers’ reactions to an automated health maintenance reminder system incorporated into the patients’ electronic medical record. J Am Board Fam Pract 2003, 16:312–317. CrossRef
- Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF: Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005, 330:765–772. CrossRef
- Strategies for improving pneumococcal vaccination in eligible patients
Current Infectious Disease Reports
Volume 8, Issue 3 , pp 231-237
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Current Medicine Group
- Additional Links