Date: 09 May 2012
Small Fiber Neuropathy: Is Skin Biopsy the Holy Grail?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is characterized by negative sensory symptoms (thermal and pinprick hypoesthesia) reflecting peripheral deafferentation and positive sensory symptoms and signs (burning pain, allodynia, hyperalgesia), which often dominate the clinical picture. In patients with pure SFN, clinical and neurophysiologic investigation do not show involvement of large myelinated nerve fiber making the diagnosis of SFN challenging in clinical practice. Over the last 15 years, skin biopsy has emerged as a novel tool that readily permits morphometric and qualitative evaluation of somatic and autonomic small nerve fibers. This technique has overcome the limitations of routine neurophysiologic tests to detect the damage of small nerve fibers. The recent availability of normative reference values allowed clinicians to reliably define the diagnosis of SFN in individual patients. This paper reviews usefulness and limitations of skin biopsy and the relationship between degeneration and regeneration of small nerve fibers in patients with diabetes and metabolic syndrome.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance, •• Of major importance
•• Tesfaye S, Boulton AJ, Dyck PJ, et al. Diabetic neuropathies: update on definitions, diagnostic criteria, estimation of severity, and treatments. Diabetes Care 2010;33:2285–2293. This consensus paper revised definition and grading of diabetic neuropathy, and provides the first definition of small fiber neuropathy for clinical practice and research.
• Devigili G, Tugnoli V, Penza P, et al. The diagnostic criteria for small fibre neuropathy: from symptoms to neuropathology. Brain 2008;131:1912–1925. A work focused on small fiber neuropathy, providing comparison between clinical examination, quantitative sensory testing, nerve conduction study, laser evoked potentials, and skin biopsy findings. It showed that skin biopsy has higher sensitivity an specificity for the diagnosis and is useful for the assessment of the natural course of neuropathy.
Martina IS, van Koningsveld R, Schmitz PI, van der Meche FG, van Doorn PA. Measuring vibration threshold with a graduated tuning fork in normal aging and in patients with polyneuropathy. European Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) group. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998;65:743–7.PubMedCrossRef
•• Faber CG, Hoeijmakers JG, Ahn HS, et al. Gain of function Na(V) 1.7 mutations in idiopathic small fiber neuropathy. Ann Neurol 2012;71:26–39. This paper demonstrated for the first time that gain-of-function mutations in SCN9A encoding for Nav1.7 subunit of sodium channel cause small fiber neuropathy. These findings contributed to identify the new syndrome of channellopathy-associated small fiber neuropathy.
•• Lauria G, Hsieh ST, Johansson O, et al. European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on the Use of Skin Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Small Fiber Neuropathy. J Periph Nerv Syst 2010;15:79–92. This paper reports the revised guidelines for the diagnostic use of skin biopsy in the diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy. Information on safety, diagnostic yield, and correlation with clinical picture, quantitative sensory testing and non-convetional neurophysiological studies are provided.
Fernandes ES, Fernandes MA, Keeble JE. The functions of TRPA1 and TRPV1: moving away from sensory nerves. Br J Pharmacol 2012.
•• Lumpkin EA, Caterina MJ. Mechanisms of sensory transduction in the skin. Nature 2007;445:858–865. A comprehensive overview on the relationship between small nerve fibers and resident cells of the skin in the mechanisms of thermal and nociceptive sensation transduction to the brain. This complex nerve-cell network demonstrates that non-neuronal structures play a critical role in sensory perception and possible neuropathic pain.
• Gibbons CH, Illigens BM, Wang N, Freeman R. Quantification of sudomotor innervation: a comparison of three methods. Muscle Nerve 2010;42:112–119. This paper provided evidence for reliable quantification of sweat gland innervation density and correlation with diabetic neuropathy clinical scores.
• Nolano M, Provitera V, Caporaso G, Stancanelli A, Vitale DF, L. S. Quantification of pilomotor nerves. A new tool to evaluate autonomic involvement in diabetes. Neurology 2010;75:1089–1097. This paper provides the first-ever reliable quantification of pilomotor muscle innervation, showing its decrease in diabetic neuropathy patients and correlation with sweating impairment.
• Lauria G, Bakkers M, Schmitz C, et al. Intraepidermal nerve fiber density at the distal leg: a worldwide normative reference study. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2010;15:202–207. A collaborative work among nine skin biopsy laboratory from Europe, USA, and Asia in 550 healthy subjects that provided age and gender-adjusted normative reference values for IENF density at the distal leg for clinical use.
Holland NR, Crawford TO, Hauer P, Cornblath DR, Griffin JW, McArthur JC. Small-fiber sensory neuropathies: clinical course and neuropathology of idiopathic cases. Ann Neurol 1998;44.
Zhou L, Li J, Ontaneda D, Sperling J. Metabolic syndrome in small fiber sensory neuropathy. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis. 2012;12:235–43.CrossRef
Luo KR, Chao CC, Chen YT, et al. Quantitation of sudomotor innervation in skin biopsies of patients with diabetic neuropathy. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2012;70:930–8.CrossRef
• Hansson P, Backonja M, Bouhassira D. Usefulness and limitations of quantitative sensory testing: clinical and research application in neuropathic pain states. Pain 2007;129:256–259. A recent and comprehensive review on methods and application of quantitative sensory testing in clinical practice and research.
Campero M, Serra J, Ochoa JL. C-polymodal nociceptors activated by noxious low temperature in human skin. J Physiol. 1996;497(Pt 2):565–72.PubMed
Creac’h C, Convers P, Robert F, Antoine JC, Camdessanche JP. Small fiber sensory neuropathies: contribution of laser evoked potentials. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2011;167:40–5.CrossRef
• Casanova-Molla J, Grau-Junyent JM, Morales M, Valls-Sole J. On the relationship between nociceptive evoked potentials and intraepidermal nerve fiber density in painful sensory polyneuropathies. Pain 2011;152:410–418. This study investigated the correlation between skin biopsy and both laser and contact heat-evoked potentials in painful neuropathy, including 52 patients with small fiber neuropathy. Results showed a correlation between low IENF density and impaired latency and amplitude of evoked potentials.
•• Ebenezer GJ, O'Donnell R, Hauer P, Cimino NP, McArthur JC, Polydefkis M. Impaired neurovascular repair in subjects with diabetes following experimental intracutaneous axotomy. Brain 2011;134:1853–1863. An elegant work in patients with diabetic neuropathy that investigated the ability of nerves, Schwann cells, and vessels to repair after chemical denervation and excision of the skin. Results demonstrated that diabetes affected the neurovascular regeneration, suggesting a role in the development of diabetic neuropathy.
- Small Fiber Neuropathy: Is Skin Biopsy the Holy Grail?
Current Diabetes Reports
Volume 12, Issue 4 , pp 384-392
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Current Science Inc.
- Additional Links
- Diabetic neuropathy
- Small fiber neuropathy
- Skin biopsy
- Neuropathic pain
- Intraepidermal nerve fibers
- Dermal nerves
- Autonomic neuropathy
- Industry Sectors