Abstract
Spanish-speaking children learn to read words printed in a relatively transparent orthography. Variation in orthographic transparency may shape the architecture of the reading system and also the manifestation of reading difficulties. We tested normally developing children and children diagnosed with reading difficulties. Reading accuracy was high across experimental conditions. However, dyslexic children read more slowly than chronological age (CA)-matched controls, although, importantly, their reading times did not differ from those for ability-matched controls. Reading times were significantly affected by frequency, orthographic neighbourhood size and word length. We also found a number of significant interaction effects. The effect of length was significantly modulated by reading ability, frequency and neighbourhood. Our findings suggest that the reading development of dyslexic children in Spanish is delayed rather than deviant. From an early age, the salient characteristic of reading development is reading speed, and the latter is influenced by specific knowledge about words.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighbourhod effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 802–814.
Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighbourhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 234–254.
Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., & Valdois, S. (1998). A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychological Review, 105, 678–723.
Baayen, R. H. (2007). Analyzing linguistic data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Backman, J. E., Mamen, M., & Ferguson, H. B. (1984). Reading level design: Conceptual and methodological issues in reading research. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 560–568.
Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. L. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 89–106.
Barca, L., Burani, C., & Arduino, L. S. (2002). Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 34, 424–434.
Barca, L., Burani, C., di Filippo, G., & Zoccolotti, P. (2007). Italian developmental dyslexic and proficient readers: Where are the differences? Brain and Language, 98(3), 347–351.
Bruck, M., Genesee, F., & Caravolas, M. (1997). A cross-linguistic study of early literacy acquisition. In B. A. Blachman (Ed.) Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 145–162). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bryant, P., & Goswami, U. (1986). Strengths and weaknesses of the reading level design: A comment on Backman, Mamen, and Ferguson. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 101–103.
Burani, C., Marcolini, S., & Stella, G. (2002). How early does morpho-lexical reading develop in readers of a shallow orthography? Brain and Language, 81, 568–586.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.) Strategies in information processing (pp. 151–216). London: Academic.
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.) Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.
Cossu, G., Gugliotta, M., & Marshall, J. C. (1990). Acquisition of reading and written spelling in a transparent orthography: Two non-parallel processes? Reading and Writing, 7, 9–22.
Cuetos, F., & Barbón, A. (2006). Word naming in Spanish. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 415–436.
Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E., & Arribas, D. (2007). PROLEC-R. Madrid: TEA Ediciones, S.A.
Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2006). Contrasting five theories of letter position coding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 535–557.
de Jong, P. F. (2003). Problems in the acquisition of fluent word decoding in Dutch children. In N. Goulandris (Ed.) Dyslexia in different languages: Cross-linguistic comparisons (pp. 33–52). London: Whurr Publishers Ltd.
de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2003). Developmental changes in the manifestation of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 22–40.
Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976). Rapid ‘automatized’ naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–479.
Ellis, N. C., & Hooper, M. (2001). Why learning to read is easier in Welsh than in English: Orthographic transparency effects evinced with frequency-matched tests. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 571–599.
Fields, A. (2007). Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows. London: Sage.
Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. Patterson, M. Coltheart, & J. Marshall (Eds.) Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330). London: Erlbaum.
Frith, U., Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Differences in phonological recoding in German- and English-speaking children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 31–54.
Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographic depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104–115.
Goswami, U., Gombert, J. E., & de Barrera, L. F. (1998). Children’s orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French, and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 19–52.
Goswami, U., Porpodas, C., & Wheelwright, S. (1997). Children’s orthographic representations in English and Greek. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 3, 273–292.
Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., Dalton, L., & Schneider, W. (2001). Pseudohomophone effects and phonological recoding procedures in reading development in English and German. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 648–664.
Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighbourhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 228–244.
Grainger, J., O'Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighbourhood frequency effect. Perception and Psychophysics, 45, 189–195.
Howell, D. C. (2002). Statistical methods for psychology (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
Jiménez González, J. E., & Hernández Valle, I. (2000). Word identification and reading disorders in the Spanish language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 44–60.
Jorm, A. F., & Share, D. L. (1983). An invited article: Phonological recoding and reading acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4, 103–147.
Jorm, A. F., Share, D. L., Maclean, R., & Matthews, G. H. (1984). Phonological recoding skills and learning to read: A longitudinal study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5, 201–207.
Juphard, A., Carbonnel, S., & Valdois, S. (2004). Length effect in reading and lexical decision: Evidence from skilled readers and a developmental dyslexic participant. Brain and Cognition, 55, 332–340.
Katz, L. & Feldman, L. B. (1981). Linguistic coding in word recognition: Comparisons between a deep and a shallow orthography. In A. M. Lesgold & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.) Interactive processes in reading (p. 85–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German–English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315–334.
Laxon, V. J., Coltheart, V., & Keating, C. (1988). Children find friendly words friendly too: Words with many orthographic neighbours are easier to read and spell. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 103–119.
Martínez, J. A., & García, M. E. (2004). Inventario silábico del lenguaje escrito dirigido a los niños de primaria. [Syllabic count of written language read by children in primary school]. Cognitiva, 16, 43–56.
Monsell, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. In D. Besner, & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.) Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 148–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nicholson, R. I., & Fawcett, A. J. (1990). Automaticity: A new framework for dyslexia research. Cognition, 35, 159–182.
Pérez, M. A., Alameda, J. R., & Cuetos Vega, F. (2003). Frequencia, longitud, vecindad ortofráfica de las palabras de 3 a 16 letras del diccionario de la lengua Español (RAE, 1992). [Frequency, length, and orthographic neighbourhood size of words of between 3 and 16 letters in length from the RAE (1992) dictionary of the Spanish language]. Revista Electronica de Metodología Aplicada, 8, 1–10.
Plaut, D. C. (1999). A connectionist approach to word reading and acquired dyslexia: extension to sequential processing. Cognitive Science, 23, 543–568.
Porpodas, C. D., Pantelis, S. N., & Hantziou, E. (1990). Phonological and lexical encoding processes in beginning readers: Effects of age and word characteristics. Reading and Writing, 2, 197–208.
Ramus, F., Rosen, S., Dakin, S. C., Day, B. L., Castellote, J. M., & White, S., et al. (2003). Theories of developmental dyslexia: Insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults. Brain, 126, 851–865.
Real Academia de la Lengua (1992). Diccionario de la Lengua Española (21a edición). Madrid: Espasa Calpa.
Sebastián, N., Martí, M. A., Carreiras, M. F., & Cuetos, F. (2000). LEXESP, Léxico informatizado del español [Computerized lexicon of Spanish]. Barcelona: Edíciones de la Universitat de Barcelona.
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.
Snowling, M. (2000). Dyslexia. Oxford: Blackwell.
Spinelli, D., De Luca, M., di Filippo, G., Mancini, M., Martelli, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2005). Length effect in word naming in reading: Role of reading experience and reading deficit in Italian readers. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27, 217–235.
Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., & Bonnet, P. (1998). Reading and spelling acquisition in French: The role of phonological mediation and orthographic factors. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 134–165.
Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40.
Weekes, B. S. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency. The Quarterly Journal Of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 439–456.
Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular reading system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1–33.
Wimmer, H. (1996a). The early manifestation of developmental dyslexia: Evidence from German children. Reading and Writing, 8, 171–188.
Wimmer, H. (1996b). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from German children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 80–90.
Wimmer, H., & Goswami, U. (1994). The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: Word recognition in English and German children. Cognition, 51, 91–103.
Yuste, C. (2002). Batería de aptitudes diferenciales y generales [Battery of differential and general aptitudes]. Madrid: CEPE.
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29.
Ziegler, J., Perry, C., Ma-Wyatt, A., Ladner, D., & Schulte-Korne, G. (2003). Developmental dyslexia in different languages: Language-specific or universal? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 169–193.
Ziegler, J., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 29, 600–618.
Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Di Pace, E., Gasperini, F., Judica, A., & Spinelli, D. (2005). Word length effect in early reading and in developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language, 93, 369–373.
Acknowledgment
Robert Davies and Fernando Cuetos are members of a Marie Curie Research and Training Network: Language and Brain (RTN: LAB) funded by the European Commission (MRTN-CT-2004–512141) as part of its Sixth Framework Programme.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davies, R., Cuetos, F. & Glez-Seijas, R.M. Reading development and dyslexia in a transparent orthography: a survey of Spanish children. Ann. of Dyslexia 57, 179–198 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-007-0010-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-007-0010-1