Does third grade discrepancy status predict the course of reading development?
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
There is persisting debate concerning the use of an ability-achievement discrepancy formula to define and identify learning disabled—including reading disabled—students. This study employs mixed effects regression growth curve analysis to assess the developmental course of discrepant and nondiscrepant readers (within poor readers) who were identified in third grade and retested in fifth, eighth, and twelfth grades. The results showed that discrepancy status does not differentiate the developmental course of basic reading skills (word identification or decoding), reading comprehension, or underlying cognitive abilities (phonemic awareness and fluency) in poor readers. The ability-achievement discrepancy model is not supported. Educational and legislative reasons for the persisting difficulties of poor readers are explored and recommendations for changes in public policy are made.
- Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Allington, R. L. (1980). Poor readers don’t get to read much in reading groups. Language Arts, 57, 872–876.
- Badian, N. A. (1995). Predicting reading ability over the long term: The changing roles of letter naming, phonological awareness and orthographic processing. Annals of Dyslexia, 40, 79–96.
- Badian, N. A. (1996). Dyslexia: Does it exist: Dyslexia, garden-variety poor reading and the double deficit hypothesis. Poster presented at the Orton Dyslexia Society conference, Boston, MA.
- Badian, N. A. (2000) Do pre-school orthographic skills contribute to prediction of reading? In N. A. Badian (ed.), Prediction and prevention of reading failure (pp. 31–56). Baltimore, MD: York Press.
- Berninger, V. W., & Abbot, R. D. (1994). Redefining learning disabilities: Moving beyond aptitude-achievement discrepancies in failure to respond to validated treatment protocols. In G. R. Lyon, (ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities (pp. 163–168). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
- Biddle, K. R. (1996). Timing deficits in impaired readers: An investigation of visual naming speed and verbal fluency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tufts University, Boston, MA.
- Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976). Rapid automatized naming (RAN): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–479. CrossRef
- Felton, R. H. (1998). The development of reading skills in poor readers: Educational implications. In C. Hulme & R. M. Joshi (eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 219–233). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Felton, R. H., Naylor, C. E., & Wood, F. B. (1990). Neuropsychological profile of adult dyslexics. Brain and Language, 39, 485–497. CrossRef
- Felton, R. H., & Wood, F. B. (1992). Cognitive deficits in reading disability and attention deficit disorder. A reading level match study of nonword reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 3–13.
- Felton, R. H., & Wood, F. B. (1992). A reading level match study of nonword reading skills in poor readers with varying IQ. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 318–326.
- Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Liberman, I. Y., Stuebing, K. K., Francis, D. J., Fowler, A. E., & Shaywitz, B. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6–23. CrossRef
- Flowers, D. L. (1994). Neuropsychological profiles of persistent reading disability and reading improvement. In C. K. Leong, & R. M. Joshi (eds.), Developmental and acquired dyslexia: Neuropsychological and neurolinguistic perspectives (pp. 61–77). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Foorman. B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., & Lynn A. (1996). Relation of phonological and orthographic processing to early reading: Comparing two approaches to regression-based, reading-level match designs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 33, 639–652. CrossRef
- Francis, D. J., Stuebing, K. K., Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3–17 CrossRef
- Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., Lipsey, M. E., & Eaton, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of reading differences between underachievers with and without the disabilities label: A brief report. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10, 1–3.
- Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
- Grigorenko, E., Wood, F. W., Meyer, M. S., Hart, L. A., Speed, W. C., Shuster, A., & Pauls, D. L. (1997). Susceptibility loci for distinct components of developmental dyslexia on chromosomes 6 and 15. American Journal of Human Genetics, 60, 27–39.
- Grigorenko, E., Wood, F., Meyer, M., & Pauls, D. (In press). Linkage studies suggest a possible locus for developmental dyslexia on chromosome 1. American Journal of Medical Genetics (Neuropsychiatric Genetics).
- Herjanic, B., & Reich, W. (1982). Development of a structured psychiatric interview for children: Agreement between child and parent on individual symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 10, 307–24. CrossRef
- Hollingshead, A. B. (1957). Four factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript. (Available from P.O. Box 1965, Yale Station, New Haven, CT 06520).
- Jastak, J., & Bijou, S. (1946). Wide range achievement test. Wilmington: Jastak Associates.
- Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243–255 CrossRef
- Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, A. M. (1989). The alphabetic principal and learning to read. In D. Shankweiler, & I. Y. Liberman (eds.), Phonology and reading disability (pp. 1–33). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
- Lindamood, C. H., & Lindamood, P. C. (1979). Lindamood Auditory Conceptualization Test. Allen, TX: DLM.
- Lindamood, C. H., Lindamood, P. C., & Calfee, R. C. (1974). The LAC test: A new look at auditory conceptualization and literacy development K-12. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Reading Association Convention, Detroit, MI.
- Lyon, G. R. (1995). Toward a definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 3–27.
- Lyon, G. R. (1996). Learning disabilities. The Future of Children, 6, 54–77. CrossRef
- Lyon, G. R. (1998). Critical advances in understanding reading acquisition and reading difficulty. Paper presented at the North Carolina Branch of the International Dyslexia Association, November 1998, Boone, NC.
- MacMillan, D. L., Gresham, F. M., & Bocian, K. M. (1998). Discrepancy between definitions of learning disabilities and school practices: An empirical investigation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 314–326.
- Meyer, M. S., Wood, F. B., Hart, L. A., & Felton, R. H. (1998). Selective predictive value of rapid automatized naming in poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 106–117.
- National Reading Panel Report. (2000). National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
- Perfetti, C. A., Beck, L., Bell, L., & Huges, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283–319.
- Richardson, E., & DeBenedetto, G. (1985). The decoding skills test. Parkton, MD: York Press.
- Rosner, J. (1979). Helping children overcome learning difficulties. New York, NY: Walker & Co.
- Rosner, J., & Simon, D. P. (1971). The auditory analysis test: An initial report. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 384–392.
- Rutter, M., & Yule, W. (1975) The concept of specific reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16, 181–197. CrossRef
- Satz, P., Taylor, H. G., Friel, J., & Fletcher, J. M. (1978). Some developmental and predictive precursors of reading disability: A six-year follow-up. In A. L. Benton & D. Pearl (eds.), Dyslexia: An appraisal of current knowledge (pp. 313–347). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Siegel, L. S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469–478.
- Siegel, L. S. (1998). The discrepancy formula: Its use and abuse. In B. K. Shapiro, P. J. Accardo, & A. J. Capute (eds.), Specific reading disabilities: A view of the spectrum. Timonium, MD: York Press.
- Share, D. L., & Silva, P. A. (1986). The stability and classification of specific reading retardation: A longitudinal study from age 7 to 11. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 32–39.
- Spear-Swerling, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1994). The road not taken: An integrative theoretical model of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 91–103, 122.
- Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407. CrossRef
- Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–612. CrossRef
- Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model of reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53. CrossRef
- Thorndike, R. L. (1963). The concepts of over- and underachievement. New York: Columbia University Bureau of Publications.
- Torgeson, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276–286.
- Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Lyon, G. R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ-achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223–238.
- Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bi-directional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73–87. CrossRef
- Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler intelligence test for children-revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
- Wolf, M. (1997). A provisional, integrative account of phonological and naming deficits in dyslexia. Implications for diagnosis and intervention. In B. L. Blachman (ed.), Cognitive and linguistic foundations of reading acquisition: Implications for intervention research (pp. 67–92). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Wolf, M., Bally, H., & Morris, R. (1986). Automaticity, retrieval processes, and reading: A longitudinal study in average and impaired readers. Child Development, 57, 988–1000. CrossRef
- Wolf, M., Bowers, P. G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387–407.
- Woodcock, R. W. (1978). Development and standardization of the Woodcock Johnson psycho-educational battery. Hingham, MA: Teaching Resources.
- Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1977). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery. Allen, TX: DLM.
- Does third grade discrepancy status predict the course of reading development?
Annals of Dyslexia
Volume 51, Issue 1 , pp 49-71
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links