Images of mathematicians: a new perspective on the shortage of women in mathematical careers
- Katrina Piatek-Jimenez
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Though women earn nearly half of the mathematics baccalaureate degrees in the United States, they make up a much smaller percentage of those pursuing advanced degrees in mathematics and those entering mathematics-related careers. Through semi-structured interviews, this study took a qualitative look at the beliefs held by five undergraduate women mathematics students about themselves and about mathematicians. The findings of this study suggest that these women held stereotypical beliefs about mathematicians, describing them to be exceptionally intelligent, obsessed with mathematics, and socially inept. Furthermore, each of these women held the firm belief that they do not exhibit at least one of these traits, the first one being unattainable and the latter two being undesirable. The results of this study suggest that although many women are earning undergraduate degrees in mathematics, their beliefs about mathematicians may be preventing them from identifying as one and choosing to pursue mathematical careers.
- Adhikari, A., Nolan, D., Chunawala, L., Heising, A., & Woon, I. (1997). A view of mathematics from an undergraduate perspective. In D. Nolan (Ed.), Women in mathematics: Scaling the heights (pp. 17–23). Washington, D.C: Mathematical Association of America.
- Bartholomew, C., & Schnorr, D. (1994). Gender equity: Suggestions for broadening career options of female students. The School Counselor, 41(4), 245–255.
- Becker, J. (1990). Graduate education in the mathematical sciences: Factors influencing women and men. In L. Burton (Ed.), Gender and mathematics: An international perspective (pp. 119–130). London: Cassell.
- Becker, J. (1995). Women’s ways of knowing in mathematics. In P. Rogers & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Equity in Mathematics Education: Influences of Feminism and Culture (pp. 163–174). London: The Falmer Press.
- Becker, J. (2003). Gender and mathematics: An issue for the twenty-first century. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9(8), 470–473.
- Boaler, J. (2002). Paying the price for “sugar and spice”: Shifting the analytical lens in equity research. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2 & 3), 127–144
- BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). (2005). Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population 25 to 64 years of age by educational attainment and sex, 2004 annual averages. Available online at: http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-table8-2005.pdf. Accessed January 2008.
- Carlone, H., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. CrossRef
- Clarkson, P. (1993). Gender, ethnicity, and textbooks. The Australian Mathematics Teacher, 49, 14–16.
- Damarin, S. (2000). The mathematically able as a marked category. Gender and Education, 12(1), 69–85. CrossRef
- Damarin, S. (1995). Gender and mathematics from a feminist standpoint. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema & L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New Directions for Equity in Mathematics Education (pp. 242–257). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Davenport, L. (1997). Promoting interest in mathematical careers among girls and women. Wisconsin Teacher of Mathematics, 48(2), 10–15.
- Davis, Z. (1997). Gender and mathematical ability: a semiotic reading of a South African primary school textbook. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 10, 64–76.
- DeHaven, M., & Wiest, L. (2003). Impact of a girls mathematics and technology program on middle school girls’ attitudes toward mathematics. The Mathematics Educator, 13(2), 32–37.
- Elgar, A. (2004). Science textbooks for lower secondary schools in Brunei: issues of gender equity. International Journal of Science Education, 26(7), 875–894. CrossRef
- Field, A., Cheung, L., Wolf, A., Herzog, D., Gortmaker, S., & Colditz, G. (1999). Exposure to the mass media and weight concerns among girls. Pediatrics, 103(3), e36. CrossRef
- Finson, K., Beaver, J., & Cramond, B. (1995). Development and field test of a checklist for the draw-a-scientist test. School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 195–205.
- Forgasz, H., Leder, G., & Gardner, P. (1999). The Fennema-Sherman mathematics as a male domain scale reexamined. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(3), 342–348. CrossRef
- Forgasz, H., Leder, G., & Kaur, B. (1999). Who can(‘t) do maths—boys/girls? An international comparison. Paper presented at the combined Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education and the New Zealand Association for Research in Education, Melbourne, Australia, November 29–December 2, 1999. ED453069.
- Forgasz, H., Leder, G., & Kloosterman, P. (2004). New perspectives on the gender stereotyping of mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(4), 389–420. CrossRef
- Forgasz, H. & Mittelberg, D. (2008). Gendered beliefs about mathematics among Australian and Israeli grade 9 students. In: Proceedings of the AARE 2007 international educational research conference, http://www.aare.edu.au/07pap/for07212.pdf
- Fox, L., & Soller, J. (2001). Psychosocial dimensions of gender differences in mathematics. In J. E. Jacobs, J. R. Becker & G. F. Gilmer (Eds.), Changing the Faces of Mathematics (pp. 9–24). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Gee, J. (2000–2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25:99–125
- Gordon, C., & Keyfitz, B. (2004). Women in academia: Are we asking the right questions? Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 51(7), 784–786.
- Guest, A., & Schneider, B. (2008). Adolescents’ extracurricular participation in context. In J. Ballantine & J. Spade (Eds.), Schools and Society: A Sociological Approach to Education (pp. 45–61). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
- Gupta, M. (2005). Summer program for women undergraduates. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 52(3), 355.
- Hale, M. (2003). Essentials of Mathematics: Introduction to Theory, Proof, and the Professional Culture. Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.
- Hargreaves, M., Homer, M., & Swinnerton, B. (2008). A comparison of performance and attitudes in mathematics amongst the ‘gifted’. Are boys better at mathematics or do they just think they are? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(1), 19–38. CrossRef
- Herzig, A. (2004). ‘Slaughtering this beautiful math’: Graduate women choosing and leaving mathematics. Gender and Education, 16(3), 379–395. CrossRef
- Huber, R., & Burton, G. (1995). What do students think scientists look like? School Science and Mathematics, 95(7), 371–376. CrossRef
- Hughes, W. J. (2000). Perceived gender interaction and course confidence among undergraduate science, mathematics, and technology majors. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 6, 155–167.
- Johnston, D., & Swanson, D. (2007). Cognitive acrobatics in the construction of worker-mother identity. Sex Roles, 57, 447–459. CrossRef
- Jones, L., & Smart, T. (1995). Confidence and mathematics: A gender issue? Gender and Education, 7(2), 157–166. CrossRef
- Kerpelman, J., & Schvaneveldt, P. (1999). Young adults’ anticipated identity importance of career, marital, and parental roles: Comparisons of men and women with different role balance orientations. Sex Roles, 41(3/4), 189–217. CrossRef
- Leder, G. & Forgasz, H. (2002). Two new instruments to probe attitude about gender and mathematics. ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE), ED463312.
- NCES (National Center for Education Statistics). (2001–2005). Digest of education statistics, 2000–2004. Available online at: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/. Accessed August 2006.
- NSF (National Science Foundation). (2004). Employed bachelor’s or higher degree recipients, by occupation, sex, race/ethnicity, country of birth, and disability status: 2000. Available online at: www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/wmpd/employ.htm. Accessed May 2005.
- NSF (National Science Foundation). (2006). Characteristics of Recent Science and Engineering Graduates: 2003, Available online at: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf06329/. Accessed February 2008.
- Picker, S., & Berry, J. (2000). Investigating pupils’ images of mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43(1), 65–94. CrossRef
- Picker, S., & Berry, J. (2001). Your students’ images of mathematicians and mathematics. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 7(4), 202–208.
- Pronin, E., Steele, C., & Ross, L. (2004). Identity bifurcation in response to stereotype threat: Women and mathematics. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 152–168. CrossRef
- Quinn, D., & Spencer, S. (2001). The interference of stereotype threat with women’s generation of mathematical problem-solving strategies. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 55–71. CrossRef
- Raty, H., Vanska, J., Kasanen, K., & Karkkainen, R. (2002). Parents’ explanations of their child’s performance in mathematics and reading: A replication and extension of Yee and Eccles. Sex Roles, 46(3/4), 121–128. CrossRef
- Riehl, C. (2008). Bridges to the future: Contributions of qualitative research to the sociology of education. In J. Ballantine & J. Spade (Eds.), Schools and society: A sociological approach to education (pp. 45–61). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
- Rossman, G., & Rallis, S. (1998). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How our schools cheat girls. New York, NY: Touchstone.
- Seegers, G., & Boekaerts, M. (1996). Gender-related differences in self-referenced cognitions in relation to mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 215–240. CrossRef
- Sharpe, N., & Sonnert, G. (1999). Proportions of women faculty and students in the mathematical sciences: A trend analysis by institutional group. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 5(1), 17–27.
- Spelke, E. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science? American Psychologist, 60(9), 950–958. CrossRef
- Spencer, S., Steele, C., & Quinn, D. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28. CrossRef
- Stokes, H., & Wyn, J. (2007). Constructing identities and making careers: young people’s perspectives on work and learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 26(5), 495–511. CrossRef
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
- The Chronicle of Higher Education. (2006). The nation: Earned degrees conferred 2001–2, 21(1), 22.
- Tiedemann, J. (2002). Teachers’ gender stereotypes as determinants of teacher perceptions in elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50(1), 49–62. CrossRef
- Walkerdine, V. (1998). Counting girls out: Girls and mathematics. Bristol, PA: Falmer, Taylor and Francis, Inc.
- Wallon, G. (2005). Aptitude or attitude? European Molecular Biology Organization reports, 6(5), 400–402.
- Wiest, L. (2004). The critical role of an informal mathematics program for girls. Copenhagen, Denmark: Paper presented at: The 10th International Congress on Mathematical Education.
- Wyer, M. (2003). Intending to stay: Images of scientists, attitudes toward women, and gender as influences on persistence among science and engineering majors. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9(1), 1–16. CrossRef
- Zelden, A., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 215–246.
- Images of mathematicians: a new perspective on the shortage of women in mathematical careers
Volume 40, Issue 4 , pp 633-646
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA