Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of Smartphone Technology for Small-Scale Silviculture: A Test of Low-Cost Technology in Eastern Ontario

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the potential use of low-cost consumer-grade smartphone technology to perform and improve field data collection in support of small-scale forest management. This proof-of-concept exercise for day-to-day forester operations focused on the effectiveness of the smartphone platform (form factor and functionality) rather than any particular smartphone software. An electronic data acquisition system for a smartphone was developed that combined a simple custom timber cruise application and mobile commercial mapping software to record and process forest stand and geospatial information, and transfer these to a small-scale operator’s existing desktop geographic information system. Workflow efficiency and system performance of the smartphone system was then measured and compared with paper-based methods presently being used in the managed forest. The smartphone greatly increased workflow efficiency by reducing data transfer and processing times, and eliminated the need to carry separate global positioning system (GPS) device, map, paper forms and digital camera. The GPS accuracy of the smartphone was more than adequate to meet operational requirements, and provided a capacity to map forest features on an ad hoc basis that is not easily done through the paper-based process. However, initial data entry using the smartphone takes longer than using paper-based notes, there is a greater chance of data entry error through inadvertent keypad touches on the small screen, and there is the potential for a device malfunction. Overall, it is concluded that smartphones offer an opportunity for small-scale operators to create electronic field data management systems that are affordable, operationally robust, compatible with existing management systems, capable of increasing data management efficiency and, in particular, expanding the types of data that can be collected during silvicultural operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Check-in/Check-out is a component of ‘versioning’ in database terminology. It allows a person to place a local copy of a data layer (for example, the locations of rare trees) onto the smartphone device, go into the field and edit those points, and return to the server computer and upload the newly collected data. Data cannot be changed on the desktop GIS until smartphone-collected modifications are uploaded. Some systems allow for simultaneous changes on the desktop while the data are checked-out, with the two sets of data being later compared with one another for consistency and any changes flagged for manual inspection.

  2. A geotagged photograph is a digital photograph with the GPS coordinates stored internally within the metadata or header section of the digital photo, allowing the photo to be placed on a digital map within a GIS at the location where it was taken.

  3. http://resources.arcgis.com/en/collector/ for Android and iOS devices. Note that these require an active internet connection to work, they cannot as of April 2013 be used for data collection in an off-line mode. Future versions should allow off-line data collection.

  4. GIS Kit Pro for iOS is a full featured geospatial data collection app that works off-line and data interchangeable with common GIS software formats, see http://garafa.com/wordpress/all-apps/gis-pro.

  5. The smartphone’s accuracy, transaction speed, and user satisfaction were not compared against proprietary personal data assistant devices that are commercially available and tailored for professionals who collect field data out of doors. It is likely the latter would be of greater accuracy, while their data transfer and processing speeds would depend on their compatibility with the user’s server-based system. However, the principal research objective was to compare the smartphone a forestry worker might already be carrying with an existing system that was already in use in the study area.

References

  • Aanensen DM, Huntley DM, Feil EJ, Al-Own F, Spratt BG (2009) EpiCollect: linking smartphones to web applications for epidemiology, ecology and community data collection. PLoS One 4(9):e6968

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard AM, Prisley SP (2005) Digital mapping alternatives: GIS for the busy forester. J For 103(4):163–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin JP, Diehl VA, Norman KL (1988) Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. CHI’88 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 213–218

  • Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q: Manag Inf Syst 13(3):319–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera JC, Work DB, Herring R, Ban X, Jacobson Q, Bayen AM (2010) Evaluation of traffic data obtained via GPS-enabled mobile phones: the mobile century field experiment. Transport Res Part C: Emerg Technol 18(4):568–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honicky, R. J., E. A. Brewer, E. Paulos and R. M. White. 2008. N-SMARTS: Networked suite of mobile atmospheric real-time sensors. Paper presented at Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM (2008) Conference on Computer Communications -2nd ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Networked Systems for Developing Regions, NSDR’08. California, USA, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman-Narahari F, Giardina C, Ostertag R, Cordell S, Sack L (2010) Digital data collection in forest dynamics plots. Methods Ecol Evol 1(3):274–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwok R (2009) Personal technology: phoning in data. Nature 458(7241):959–961

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Jiang Y (2011) Development of mobile GIS system for forest resources second-class inventory. J For Res 22(2):263–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Wang Z (2009) A VB-based forest field data collection system. Paper presented at 2nd international workshop on computer science and engineering, WCSE, Qingdao, China

  • Longley PA, Goodchild MF, Maguire DJ, Rhind DW (2005) Geographic information systems and science, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, LTD, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell A (2005) The ESRI guide to GIS analysis, vol 2. ESRI Press, Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Park Y, Chen JV (2007) Acceptance and adoption of the innovative use of smartphone. Ind Manage Data Syst 107(9):1349–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker-Osborn C, Mann S, Mann V (2013) To byod or… not to byod. ITNOW 55(1):38–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao W-Q, Li C-G (2010) Mobile GIS system for forest resources inventory. Paper presented at 2010 international conference on multimedia technology, ICMT Ningbo, China

  • Zhou Y, Liu P, Tang X (2009) Application of PDA forest fire monitoring based on web service technology. Frontiers China 4(3):358–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this research was provided by a Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada grant for environmental research and the Ontario Graduate Scholarship Program. Jean-Luc Martin programmed and developed the Forest Stand and Marco software applications. Participants in several online communities shared suggestions and experiences in developing mobile technology for data collection. This article benefitted considerably from the comments of the editor and two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert McLeman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kennedy, R., McLeman, R., Sawada, M. et al. Use of Smartphone Technology for Small-Scale Silviculture: A Test of Low-Cost Technology in Eastern Ontario. Small-scale Forestry 13, 101–115 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-013-9243-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-013-9243-5

Keywords

Navigation