On Polkinghorne’s Unification of General Providence, Special Providence and Miracle
- Morgan Luck
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
John Polkinghorne claims there are no real distinctions between general providence, special providence and miracle. In this paper I determine whether this claim could be true given Polkinghorne’s wider account of these types of divine action. I conclude that this claim could be true, but only given a particular reading of Polkinghorne. I then defend this reading in light of two potential objections.
- Polkinghorne, J. (1990). God's Action in the World. CTNS Bulletin, 10(2), 1–7.
- Polkinghorne, J. (2005). Science and providence: God's interaction with the world. West Conshohocken: Templeton Foundation Press.
- Polkinghorne, J. (1995). Science and Religion in Dialogue. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International.
- Polkinghorne, J. (2002). The Credibilty of the Miraclous. Zygon, 37(3), 751–757. CrossRef
- On Polkinghorne’s Unification of General Providence, Special Providence and Miracle
Volume 49, Issue 4 , pp 577-589
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- John Polkinghorne
- General providence
- Special providence
- Divine action
- Morgan Luck (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Humanities and Social Sciences, & The Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW, 2678, Australia