Skip to main content
Log in

Highlights of the Salt Extraction Process

  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents the salient features of a new process for the recovery of metal values from secondary sources and waste materials such as slag and flue dusts. It is also feasible in extracting metals such as nickel and cobalt from ores that normally are difficult to enrich and process metallurgically. The salt extraction process is based on extraction of the metals from the raw materials by a molten salt bath consisting of NaCl, LiCl, and KCl corresponding to the eutectic composition with AlCl3 as the chlorinating agent. The process is operated in the temperature range 973 K (700°C) to 1173 K (900°C). The process was shown to be successful in extracting Cr and Fe from electric arc furnace (EAF) slag. Electrolytic copper could be produced from copper concentrate based on chalcopyrite in a single step. Conducting the process in oxygen-free atmosphere, sulfur could be captured in the elemental form. The method proved to be successful in extracting lead from spent cathode ray tubes. In order to prevent the loss of AlCl3 in the vapor form and also chlorine gas emission at the cathode during the electrolysis, liquid aluminum was used. The process was shown to be successful in extracting Nd and Dy from magnetic scrap. The method is a highly promising process route for the recovery of strategic metals. It also has the added advantage of being environmentally friendly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Mishra and D.L. Olson, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 66, 396 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. W. Han, Q. Chen, Y. Sun, T. Jiang, and M. Zhang, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 42B, 1367 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Castrillejo, M.R. Bermejo, A.I. Barrado, R. Pardo, E. Barrado, and A.M. Martinez, Electrochim. Acta 50, 2047 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Ito and T. Nohira, Electrochim. Acta 45, 2611 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Seetharaman and O. Grinder, Patent US8470271 and SE532674. Patent rights owned by Salt Extraction AB, Sweden. PCT: WO 2009/139 715 A1 (2009).

  6. L.D. Teng, S. Seetharaman, and S. Sridhar, Patent WO2013028126 (A1) (23 February 2013).

  7. X.L. Ge, O. Grinder, and S. Seetharaman, Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. C: Min. Proc. Extr. Metall. 119, 27 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Khalaghi, L.D. Teng, and S. Seetharaman (Paper presented at the International Conference on Molten Slags, Fluxes and Salts, Molten 2012, Beijing, May 2012).

  9. X.L. Ge and S. Seetharaman, Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. C: Min. Proc. Extr. Metall. 119, 93 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  10. L.D. Teng, S. Seetharaman, K. Yamaguchi and Y. Izumi, Patent WO2013025169 (A1) (21 February 2013).

  11. The Doe Run Company, Glass Recycling Options, www.dnr.mo.gov/env/hwp/escrap/docs/doerun.pdf.

  12. A. Abbasalizadeh, L.D. Teng, and S. Seetharaman, (Paper presented at the 5th Conference on Ionic Liquids-COIL Conference, Portugal, November 2012).

  13. A. Abbasalizadeh, L.D. Teng, S. Sridhar, and S. Seetharaman, unpublished work, July 2013.

  14. H. Yamana, B.G. Park, O. Shirai, T. Fujii, K. Uehara, and H. Moriyama, J. Alloys Compd. 408–412, 66 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Shirayama and T.H. Okabe, 3rd International Conference on Processing Materials for Properties, Vol. 1, ed. B. Mishra, P. Bhandhubanyong, and A. Fuma (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 2009), pp. 469–474.

  16. K. Fukasawa, A. Uehara, T. Nagai, T. Fujii, and H. Yamana, J. Alloys Compd. 509, 5112 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. K. Fukasawa, A. Uehara, T. Nagai, T. Fujii, and H. Yamana, J. Nucl. Mater. 414, 265 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. C. Hamel, P. Chamelot, and P. Taxil, Electrochim. Acta 49, 4467 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Y. Castrillejo, M.R. Bermejo, E. Barrado, A.M. Martinez, and P. Diaz Arocas, J. Electroanal. Chem. 545, 141 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aida Abbasalizadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abbasalizadeh, A., Seetharaman, S., Teng, L. et al. Highlights of the Salt Extraction Process. JOM 65, 1552–1558 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0752-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0752-7

Keywords

Navigation