Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

E-waste and the digital transition: Results from a survey of U.S. Households

  • Recycling of Electronic Wastes
  • Overview
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Until now, only rough estimates were available for the number of televisions (TVs) added to the growing stockpile of obsolete TVs by the June 2009 federally mandated digital transition. This event caused millions of Americans either to replace functioning analog TVs with digital units and purchase cable or satellite service, or to purchase subsidized analog-to-digital converter boxes. In this context, this paper makes two contributions based on results of a survey of 3,156 U.S. households conducted between the end of December 2009 and January 2010. First, we estimate the number of analog TVs that were retired as a result of the digital transition and we analyze the socioeconomic characteristics of the households affected. Second, we quantify the volume of nine metals (antimony, cadmium, chromium, copper, gold, lead, palladium, silver, and zinc) contained in these retired TVs. Our results are important to understand the e-waste consequences of the digital transition and to inform U.S. e-waste policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FCC, The Digital TV Transition—What You Need to Know about DTV (Washington, D.C.: Federal Communication Commission, 2009), retrieved 02/01/11 from www.dtv.gov/consumercorner.html.

    Google Scholar 

  2. U.S. EPA, “Electronics Waste Management in the United States: Approach One” (No. 530-R-07-004a) (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  3. B.H. Robinson, “E-waste: An Assessment of Global Production and Environmental Impacts,” Science of the Total Environment, 408 (2009), pp. 183–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. U.S. EPA, “Lead in Paint, Dust, and Soil” (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2010), retrieved 12/21/10 from www.epa.gov/lead/pubs/leadinfo.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  5. U.S. EPA, “Cadmium Compounds” (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007), retrieved on 12/21/10 from www.epa.gov/ttnatw01/hlthef/cadmium.html.

    Google Scholar 

  6. U.S. EPA, “Chromium Compounds” (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007), retrieved on 12/21/10 from www.epa.gov/ttnatw01/ hlthef/cadmium.html.

    Google Scholar 

  7. UNEP, “Recycling—From E-Waste to Resources” (United Nations Environmental Program, 2009), retrieved on 11/13/10 from www.unep.org/PDF/PressReleases/E-Waste_publication_screen_FINALVERSION-sml.pdf.

  8. T. Matsuto, C.H. Jung, and N. Tanaka, Waste Management, 24(5) (2004), pp. 425–436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. UNU, “Review of Directive 2002/96 on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE): Final Report” (Bonn, Germany: United Nations University, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  10. ATSDR, “2007 CERCLA Priority List of Hazardous Substances” (Atlanta, Georgia: Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry, 2007), retrieved on 04/26/11 from www.atsdr.cdc.gov/cercla/07list.html.

    Google Scholar 

  11. U.S. Census Bureau, “American Community Survey Demographic and Housing Estimates: 2009” (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010), retrieved 02/28/11 from www.factfi nder.census.gov.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.S. Long and J. Freese, Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables using Stata, 2nd edition (College Station, TX.: Stata Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Economics, and Planning, Policy, & Design Departments, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA

    Jean-Daniel Saphores

  2. School of Social Ecology, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA

    Natalia Milovantseva

Authors
  1. Jean-Daniel Saphores
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Natalia Milovantseva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Daniel Saphores.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saphores, JD., Milovantseva, N. E-waste and the digital transition: Results from a survey of U.S. Households. JOM 63, 14–17 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-011-0148-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-011-0148-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation