Computational Methods for Parachute Fluid–Structure Interactions
 Kenji Takizawa,
 Tayfun E. Tezduyar
 … show all 2 hide
Rent the article at a discount
Rent now* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Get AccessAbstract
The computational challenges posed by fluid–structure interaction (FSI) modeling of parachutes include the lightness of the parachute canopy compared to the air masses involved in the parachute dynamics, in the case of “ringsail” parachutes the geometric complexities created by the construction of the canopy from “rings” and “sails” with hundreds of ring “gaps” and sail “slits”, and in the case of parachute clusters the contact between the parachutes. The Team for Advanced Flow Simulation and Modeling ( ) has successfully addressed these computational challenges with the Stabilized Space–Time FSI (SSTFSI) technique, which was developed and improved over the years by the and serves as the core numerical technology, and a number of special techniques developed in conjunction with the SSTFSI technique. The quasidirect and direct coupling techniques developed by the , which are applicable to cases with incompatible fluid and structure meshes at the interface, yield more robust algorithms for FSI computations where the structure is light and therefore more sensitive to the variations in the fluid dynamics forces. The special technique used in dealing with the geometric complexities of the rings and sails is the Homogenized Modeling of Geometric Porosity, which was developed and improved in recent years by the . The SurfaceEdgeNode Contact Tracking (SENCT) technique was introduced by the as a contact algorithm where the objective is to prevent the structural surfaces from coming closer than a minimum distance in an FSI computation. The recentlyintroduced conservative version of the SENCT technique is more robust and is now an essential technology in the parachute cluster computations carried out by the . We provide an overview of the core and special techniques developed by the , present singleparachute FSI computations carried out for designparameter studies, and report FSI computation and dynamical analysis of twoparachute clusters.
 Hughes, TJR, Liu, WK, Zimmermann, TK (1981) Lagrangian–Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 29: pp. 329349
 Tezduyar, T, Aliabadi, S, Behr, M, Johnson, A, Mittal, S (1993) Parallel finiteelement computation of 3D flows. Computer 26: pp. 2736
 Behr, M, Johnson, A, Kennedy, J, Mittal, S, Tezduyar, T (1993) Computation of incompressible flows with implicit finite element implementations on the Connection Machine. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 108: pp. 99118
 Tezduyar, TE, Aliabadi, SK, Behr, M, Mittal, S (1994) Massively parallel finite element simulation of compressible and incompressible flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 119: pp. 157177
 Mittal, S, Tezduyar, TE (1994) Massively parallel finite element computation of incompressible flows involving fluidbody interactions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 112: pp. 253282
 Mittal, S, Tezduyar, TE (1995) Parallel finite element simulation of 3D incompressible flows—fluidstructure interactions. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 21: pp. 933953
 Aliabadi, SK, Tezduyar, TE (1995) Parallel fluid dynamics computations in aerospace applications. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 21: pp. 783805
 Tezduyar, T, Aliabadi, S, Behr, M, Johnson, A, Kalro, V, Litke, M (1996) Flow simulation and high performance computing. Comput Mech 18: pp. 397412
 Johnson, AA, Tezduyar, TE (1997) Parallel computation of incompressible flows with complex geometries. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 24: pp. 13211340
 Johnson, AA, Tezduyar, TE (1999) Advanced mesh generation and update methods for 3D flow simulations. Comput Mech 23: pp. 130143
 Behr, M, Tezduyar, T (1999) The ShearSlip Mesh Update Method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 174: pp. 261274
 Kalro, V, Tezduyar, TE (2000) A parallel 3D computational method for fluid–structure interactions in parachute systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190: pp. 321332
 Stein, K, Benney, R, Kalro, V, Tezduyar, TE, Leonard, J, Accorsi, M (2000) Parachute fluid–structure interactions: 3D Computation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190: pp. 373386
 Tezduyar, TE (2001) Finite element methods for flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Arch Comput Methods Eng 8: pp. 83130
 Tezduyar, T, Osawa, Y (2001) Fluid–structure interactions of a parachute crossing the far wake of an aircraft. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191: pp. 717726
 Stein, K, Benney, R, Tezduyar, T, Potvin, J (2001) Fluid–structure interactions of a cross parachute: Numerical simulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191: pp. 673687
 Ohayon, R (2001) Reduced symmetric models for modal analysis of internal structuralacoustic and hydroelasticsloshing systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190: pp. 30093019
 Behr, M, Tezduyar, T (2001) Shearslip mesh update in 3D computation of complex flow problems with rotating mechanical components. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190: pp. 31893200
 Stein, K, Tezduyar, T, Benney, R (2003) Mesh moving techniques for fluid–structure interactions with large displacements. J Appl Mech 70: pp. 5863
 Stein, K, Tezduyar, TE, Benney, R (2004) Automatic mesh update with the solidextension mesh moving technique. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193: pp. 20192032
 Brummelen, EH, Borst, R (2005) On the nonnormality of subiteration for a fluidstructure interaction problem. SIAM J Sci Comput 27: pp. 599621
 Tezduyar, TE, Sathe, S, Keedy, R, Stein, K (2006) Space–time finite element techniques for computation of fluid–structure interactions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195: pp. 20022027
 Tezduyar, TE, Sathe, S, Stein, K (2006) Solution techniques for the fullydiscretized equations in computation of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time formulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195: pp. 57435753
 Torii, R, Oshima, M, Kobayashi, T, Takagi, K, Tezduyar, TE (2006) Computer modeling of cardiovascular fluid–structure interactions with the DeformingSpatialDomain/Stabilized Space–Time formulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195: pp. 18851895
 Torii, R, Oshima, M, Kobayashi, T, Takagi, K, Tezduyar, TE (2006) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of aneurysmal conditions with high and normal blood pressures. Comput Mech 38: pp. 482490
 Bazilevs, Y, Calo, VM, Zhang, Y, Hughes, TJR (2006) Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis with applications to arterial blood flow. Comput Mech 38: pp. 310322
 Tezduyar, TE (2007) Finite elements in fluids: Stabilized formulations and moving boundaries and interfaces. Comput Fluids 36: pp. 191206
 Brenk, M, Bungartz, HJ, Mehl, M, Neckel, T Fluid–structure interaction on Cartesian grids: Flow simulation and coupling environment. In: Bungartz, HJ, Schafer, M eds. (2006) Fluid–structure interaction. Springer, Berlin, pp. 233269
 Lohner, R, Cebral, JR, Yang, C, Baum, JD, Mestreau, EL, Soto, O Extending the range of applicability of the loose coupling approach for FSI simulations. In: Bungartz, HJ, Schafer, M eds. (2006) Fluid–structure interaction. Springer, Berlin, pp. 82100
 Bletzinger, KU, Wuchner, R, Kupzok, A Algorithmic treatment of shells and free formmembranes in FSI. In: Bungartz, HJ, Schafer, M eds. (2006) Fluid–structure interaction. Springer, Berlin, pp. 336355
 Tezduyar, TE, Sathe, S, Cragin, T, Nanna, B, Conklin, BS, Pausewang, J, Schwaab, M (2007) Modeling of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time finite elements: Arterial fluid mechanics. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54: pp. 901922
 Torii, R, Oshima, M, Kobayashi, T, Takagi, K, Tezduyar, TE (2007) Influence of wall elasticity in patientspecific hemodynamic simulations. Comput Fluids 36: pp. 160168
 Sawada, T, Hisada, T (2007) Fluid–structure interaction analysis of the two dimensional flaginwind problem by an interface tracking ALE finite element method. Comput Fluids 36: pp. 136146
 Tezduyar, TE, Sathe, S (2007) Modeling of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time finite elements: Solution techniques. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54: pp. 855900
 Takizawa, K, Yabe, T, Tsugawa, Y, Tezduyar, TE, Mizoe, H (2007) Computation of free–surface flows and fluid–object interactions with the CIP method based on adaptive meshless Soroban grids. Comput Mech 40: pp. 167183
 Takizawa, K, Tanizawa, K, Yabe, T, Tezduyar, TE (2007) Ship hydrodynamics computations with the CIP method based on adaptive Soroban grids. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54: pp. 10111019
 Yabe, T, Takizawa, K, Tezduyar, TE, Im, HN (2007) Computation of fluid–solid and fluid–fluid interfaces with the CIP method based on adaptive Soroban grids—an overview. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54: pp. 841853
 Torii, R, Oshima, M, Kobayashi, T, Takagi, K, Tezduyar, TE (2007) Numerical investigation of the effect of hypertensive blood pressure on cerebral aneurysm—dependence of the effect on the aneurysm shape. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54: pp. 9951009
 Manguoglu, M, Sameh, AH, Tezduyar, TE, Sathe, S (2008) A nested iterative scheme for computation of incompressible flows in long domains. Comput Mech 43: pp. 7380
 Tezduyar, TE, Sathe, S, Pausewang, J, Schwaab, M, Christopher, J, Crabtree, J (2008) Interface projection techniques for fluid–structure interaction modeling with movingmesh methods. Comput Mech 43: pp. 3949
 Tezduyar, TE, Sathe, S, Pausewang, J, Schwaab, M, Christopher, J, Crabtree, J (2008) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of ringsail parachutes. Comput Mech 43: pp. 133142
 Tezduyar, TE, Sathe, S, Schwaab, M, Conklin, BS (2008) Arterial fluid mechanics modeling with the stabilized space–time fluid–structure interaction technique. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 57: pp. 601629
 Sathe, S, Tezduyar, TE (2008) Modeling of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time finite elements: contact problems. Comput Mech 43: pp. 5160
 Torii, R, Oshima, M, Kobayashi, T, Takagi, K, Tezduyar, TE (2008) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of a patientspecific cerebral aneurysm: influence of structural modeling. Comput Mech 43: pp. 151159
 Bazilevs, Y, Calo, VM, Hughes, TJR, Zhang, Y (2008) Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations. Comput Mech 43: pp. 337
 Isaksen, JG, Bazilevs, Y, Kvamsdal, T, Zhang, Y, Kaspersen, JH, Waterloo, K, Romner, B, Ingebrigtsen, T (2008) Determination of wall tension in cerebral artery aneurysms by numerical simulation. Stroke 39: pp. 31723178
 Dettmer, WG, Peric, D (2008) On the coupling between fluid flow and mesh motion in the modelling of fluid–structure interaction. Comput Mech 43: pp. 8190
 Bazilevs, Y, Hughes, TJR (2008) NURBSbased isogeometric analysis for the computation of flows about rotating components. Comput Mech 43: pp. 143150
 Heil, M, Hazel, AL, Boyle, J (2008) Solvers for largedisplacement fluid–structure interaction problems: segregated versus monolithic approaches. Comput Mech 43: pp. 91101
 Sternel, DC, Schaefer, M, Heck, M, Yigit, S (2008) Efficiency and accuracy of fluid–structure interaction simulations using an implicit partitioned approach. Comput Mech 43: pp. 103113
 Mehl, M, Brenk, M, Bungartz, HJ, Daubner, K, Muntean, IL, Neckel, T (2008) An Eulerian approach for partitioned fluid–structure simulations on Cartesian grids. Comput Mech 43: pp. 115124
 Idelsohn, SR, Marti, J, SoutoIglesias, A, Onate, E (2008) Interaction between an elastic structure and freesurface flows: experimental versus numerical comparisons using the PFEM. Comput Mech 43: pp. 125132
 Idelsohn, SR, Marti, J, Limache, A, Onate, E (2008) Unified Lagrangian formulation for elastic solids and incompressible fluids: application to fluid–structure interaction problems via the PFEM. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197: pp. 17621776
 Tezduyar, TE, Schwaab, M, Sathe, S (2009) SequentiallyCoupled Arterial Fluid–Structure Interaction (SCAFSI) technique. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198: pp. 35243533
 Torii, R, Oshima, M, Kobayashi, T, Takagi, K, Tezduyar, TE (2009) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of blood flow and cerebral aneurysm: significance of artery and aneurysm shapes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198: pp. 36133621
 Manguoglu, M, Sameh, AH, Saied, F, Tezduyar, TE, Sathe, S (2009) Preconditioning techniques for nonsymmetric linear systems in computation of incompressible flows. J Appl Mech 76:
 Bazilevs, Y, Gohean, JR, Hughes, TJR, Moser, RD, Zhang, Y (2009) Patientspecific isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis of thoracic aortic blood flow due to implantation of the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198: pp. 35343550
 Bazilevs, Y, Hsu, MC, Benson, D, Sankaran, S, Marsden, A (2009) Computational fluid–structure interaction: methods and application to a total cavopulmonary connection. Comput Mech 45: pp. 7789
 Idelsohn, SR, Pin, FD, Rossi, R, Onate, E (2009) Fluidstructure interaction problems with strong addedmass effect. Int J Numer Methods Eng 80: pp. 12611294
 Takizawa, K, Christopher, J, Tezduyar, TE, Sathe, S (2010) Space–time finite element computation of arterial fluid–structure interactions with patientspecific data. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 26: pp. 101116
 Takizawa, K, Moorman, C, Wright, S, Christopher, J, Tezduyar, TE (2010) Wall shear stress calculations in space–time finite element computation of arterial fluid–structure interactions. Comput Mech 46: pp. 3141
 Tezduyar, TE, Takizawa, K, Moorman, C, Wright, S, Christopher, J (2010) Multiscale sequentiallycoupled arterial FSI technique. Comput Mech 46: pp. 1729
 Torii, R, Oshima, M, Kobayashi, T, Takagi, K, Tezduyar, TE (2010) Influence of wall thickness on fluid–structure interaction computations of cerebral aneurysms. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 26: pp. 336347
 Manguoglu, M, Takizawa, K, Sameh, AH, Tezduyar, TE (2010) Solution of linear systems in arterial fluid mechanics computations with boundary layer mesh refinement. Comput Mech 46: pp. 8389
 Mayer, UM, Popp, A, Gerstenberger, A, Wall, WA (2010) 3D fluid–structure–contact interaction based on a combined XFEM FSI and dual mortar contact approach. Comput Mech 46: pp. 5367
 Sugiyama, K, Ii, S, Takeuchi, S, Takagi, S, Matsumoto, Y (2010) Full Eulerian simulations of biconcave neoHookean particles in a Poiseuille flow. Comput Mech 46: pp. 147157
 Calderer, R, Masud, A (2010) A multiscale stabilized ALE formulation for incompressible flows with moving boundaries. Comput Mech 46: pp. 185197
 Torii, R, Oshima, M, Kobayashi, T, Takagi, K, Tezduyar, TE (2010) Role of 0D peripheral vasculature model in fluid–structure interaction modeling of aneurysms. Comput Mech 46: pp. 4352
 Bazilevs, Y, Hsu, MC, Zhang, Y, Wang, W, Liang, X, Kvamsdal, T, Brekken, R, Isaksen, J (2010) A fullycoupled fluid–structure interaction simulation of cerebral aneurysms. Comput Mech 46: pp. 316
 Tezduyar, TE, Takizawa, K, Moorman, C, Wright, S, Christopher, J (2010) Space–time finite element computation of complex fluid–structure interactions. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 64: pp. 12011218
 Bazilevs, Y, Hsu, MC, Zhang, Y, Wang, W, Kvamsdal, T, Hentschel, S, Isaksen, J (2010) Computational fluid–structure interaction: methods and application to cerebral aneurysms. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 9: pp. 481498
 Kiendl, J, Bazilevs, Y, Hsu, MC, Wüchner, R, Bletzinger, KU (2010) The bending strip method for isogeometric analysis of Kirchhoff–Love shell structures comprised of multiple patches. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199: pp. 24032416
 Ryzhakov, PB, Rossi, R, Idelsohn, SR, Onate, E (2010) A monolithic Lagrangian approach for fluid–structure interaction problems. Comput Mech 46: pp. 883899
 Bazilevs, Y, Hsu, MC, Akkerman, I, Wright, S, Takizawa, K, Henicke, B, Spielman, T, Tezduyar, TE (2011) 3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part I: Geometry modeling and aerodynamics. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65: pp. 207235
 Bazilevs, Y, Hsu, MC, Kiendl, J, Wüchner, R, Bletzinger, KU (2011) 3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part II: Fluid–structure interaction modeling with composite blades. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65: pp. 236253
 Takizawa, K, Moorman, C, Wright, S, Spielman, T, Tezduyar, TE (2011) Fluid–structure interaction modeling and performance analysis of the Orion spacecraft parachutes. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65: pp. 271285
 Takizawa, K, Moorman, C, Wright, S, Purdue, J, McPhail, T, Chen, PR, Warren, J, Tezduyar, TE (2011) Patientspecific arterial fluid–structure interaction modeling of cerebral aneurysms. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65: pp. 308323
 Takizawa, K, Wright, S, Moorman, C, Tezduyar, TE (2011) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of parachute clusters. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65: pp. 286307
 Manguoglu, M, Takizawa, K, Sameh, AH, Tezduyar, TE (2011) Nested and parallel sparse algorithms for arterial fluid mechanics computations with boundary layer mesh refinement. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65: pp. 135149
 Tezduyar, TE, Takizawa, K, Brummer, T, Chen, PR (2011) Space–time fluid–structure interaction modeling of patientspecific cerebral aneurysms. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 27: pp. 16651710
 Takizawa, K, Tezduyar, TE (2011) Multiscale space–time fluid–structure interaction techniques. Comput Mech 48: pp. 247267
 Takizawa, K, Spielman, T, Tezduyar, TE (2011) Space–time FSI modeling and dynamical analysis of spacecraft parachutes and parachute clusters. Comput Mech 48: pp. 345364
 Takizawa, K, Spielman, T, Moorman, C, Tezduyar, TE (2012) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of spacecraft parachutes for simulationbased design. J Appl Mech 79:
 Takizawa, K, Brummer, T, Tezduyar, TE, Chen, PR (2012) A comparative study based on patientspecific fluid–structure interaction modeling of cerebral aneurysms. J Appl Mech 79:
 Takizawa, K, Henicke, B, Puntel, A, Spielman, T, Tezduyar, TE (2012) Space–time computational techniques for the aerodynamics of flapping wings. J Appl Mech 79:
 Takizawa, K, Henicke, B, Montes, D, Tezduyar, TE, Hsu, MC, Bazilevs, Y (2011) Numericalperformance studies for the stabilized space–time computation of windturbine rotor aerodynamics. Comput Mech 48: pp. 647657
 Sawada T, Tezuka A (2011) LLM and XFEM based interface modeling of fluid–thin structure interactions on a noninterfacefitted mesh. Comput Mech. doi:10.1007/s004660110600y
 Manguoglu, M, Takizawa, K, Sameh, AH, Tezduyar, TE (2011) A parallel sparse algorithm targeting arterial fluid mechanics computations. Comput Mech 48: pp. 377384
 Onate E, Celigueta MA, Idelsohn SR, Salazar F, Suarez B (2011) Possibilities of the particle finite element method for fluid–soil–structure interaction problems. Comput Mech. doi:10.1007/s0046601106172
 Takase, S, Kashiyama, K, Tanaka, S, Tezduyar, TE (2011) Space–time SUPG finite element computation of shallowwater flows with moving shorelines. Comput Mech 48: pp. 293306
 Nagaoka, S, Nakabayashi, Y, Yagawa, G, Kim, YJ (2011) Accurate fluid–structure interaction computations using elements without midside nodes. Comput Mech..
 Stein, KR, Benney, RJ, Kalro, V, Johnson, AA, Tezduyar, TE (1997) Parallel computation of parachute fluid–structure interactions. Proceedings of AIAA 14th aerodynamic decelerator systems technology conference.
 Stein, KR, Benney, RJ, Tezduyar, TE, Leonard, JW, Accorsi, ML (2001) Fluid–structure interactions of a round parachute: modeling and simulation techniques. J Aircr 38: pp. 800808
 Stein, K, Tezduyar, T, Kumar, V, Sathe, S, Benney, R, Thornburg, E, Kyle, C, Nonoshita, T (2003) Aerodynamic interactions between parachute canopies. J Appl Mech 70: pp. 5057
 Stein, K, Tezduyar, T, Benney, R (2003) Computational methods for modeling parachute systems. Comput Sci Eng 5: pp. 3946
 Tezduyar, TE (1992) Stabilized finite element formulations for incompressible flow computations. Adv Appl Mech 28: pp. 144
 Tezduyar, TE, Behr, M, Liou, J (1992) A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces—the deformingspatialdomain/space–time procedure: I. The concept and the preliminary numerical tests. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 94: pp. 339351
 Tezduyar, TE, Behr, M, Mittal, S, Liou, J (1992) A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces—the deformingspatialdomain/space–time procedure: II. Computation of freesurface flows, twoliquid flows, and flows with drifting cylinders. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 94: pp. 353371
 Tezduyar, TE (2003) Computation of moving boundaries and interfaces and stabilization parameters. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 43: pp. 555575
 Brooks, AN, Hughes, TJR (1982) Streamline upwind/PetrovGalerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible NavierStokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 32: pp. 199259
 Tezduyar, TE, Mittal, S, Ray, SE, Shih, R (1992) Incompressible flow computations with stabilized bilinear and linear equalorderinterpolation velocitypressure elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 95: pp. 221242
 Tezduyar, TE, Behr, M, Mittal, S, Johnson, AA (1992) Computation of unsteady incompressible flows with the finite element methods—space–time formulations, iterative strategies and massively parallel implementations. New methods in transient analysis. ASME, New York, pp. 724
 Johnson, AA, Tezduyar, TE (1994) Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 119: pp. 7394
 Tezduyar, TE Finite element methods for fluid dynamics with moving boundaries and interfaces. In: Stein, E, Borst, RD, Hughes, TJR eds. (2004) Fluids. Encyclopedia of computational mechanics, volume 3. Wiley, New York
 Tezduyar, TE (2007) Finite elements in fluids: Special methods and enhanced solution techniques. Comput Fluids 36: pp. 207223
 Tezduyar, TE, Osawa, Y (2000) Finite element stabilization parameters computed from element matrices and vectors. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190: pp. 411430
 Akin, JE, Tezduyar, T, Ungor, M, Mittal, S (2003) Stabilization parameters and Smagorinsky turbulence model. J Appl Mech 70: pp. 29
 Akin, JE, Tezduyar, TE (2004) Calculation of the advective limit of the SUPG stabilization parameter for linear and higherorder elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193: pp. 19091922
 Catabriga, L, Coutinho, ALGA, Tezduyar, TE (2005) Compressible flow SUPG parameters computed from element matrices. Commun Numer Methods Eng 21: pp. 465476
 Tezduyar, TE, Senga, M, Vicker, D (2006) Computation of inviscid supersonic flows around cylinders and spheres with the SUPG formulation and YZβ shockcapturing. Comput Mech 38: pp. 469481
 Tezduyar, TE, Sathe, S (2006) Enhanceddiscretization selective stabilization procedure (EDSSP). Comput Mech 38: pp. 456468
 Onate, E, Valls, A, Garcia, J (2006) FIC/FEM formulation with matrix stabilizing terms for incompressible flows at low and high Reynolds numbers. Comput Mech 38: pp. 440455
 Corsini, A, Rispoli, F, Santoriello, A, Tezduyar, TE (2006) Improved discontinuitycapturing finite element techniques for reaction effects in turbulence computation. Comput Mech 38: pp. 356364
 Catabriga, L, Coutinho, ALGA, Tezduyar, TE (2006) Compressible flow SUPG parameters computed from degreeoffreedom submatrices. Comput Mech 38: pp. 334343
 Rispoli, F, Corsini, A, Tezduyar, TE (2007) Finite element computation of turbulent flows with the discontinuitycapturing directional dissipation (DCDD). Comput Fluids 36: pp. 121126
 Corsini, A, Iossa, C, Rispoli, F, Tezduyar, TE (2010) A DRD finite element formulation for computing turbulent reacting flows in gas turbine combustors. Comput Mech 46: pp. 159167
 Hsu, MC, Bazilevs, Y, Calo, VM, Tezduyar, TE, Hughes, TJR (2010) Improving stability of stabilized and multiscale formulations in flow simulations at small time steps. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199: pp. 828840
 Corsini, A, Rispoli, F, Tezduyar, TE (2011) Stabilized finite element computation of NOx emission in aeroengine combustors. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65: pp. 254270
 Tezduyar, TE, Park, YJ (1986) Discontinuity capturing finite element formulations for nonlinear convectiondiffusionreaction equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 59: pp. 307325
 Shakib, F, Hughes, TJR, Johan, Z (1991) A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: X. The compressible Euler and NavierStokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 89: pp. 141219
 Lo A (1982) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of cable and membrane structure. PhD thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Oregon State University
 Benney, RJ, Stein, KR, Leonard, JW, Accorsi, ML (1997) Current 3D structural dynamic finite element modeling capabilities. Proceedings of AIAA 14th aerodynamic decelerator systems technology conference.
 Hilber, HM, Hughes, TJR, Taylor, RL (1977) Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 5: pp. 283292
 Saad, Y, Schultz, M (1986) GMRES: A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 7: pp. 856869
 Johnson, AA, Tezduyar, TE (1996) Simulation of multiple spheres falling in a liquidfilled tube. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 134: pp. 351373
 Fujisawa, T, Inaba, M, Yagawa, G (2003) Parallel computing of highspeed compressible flows using a nodebased finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 58: pp. 481511
 Johan, Z, Mathur, KK, Johnsson, SL, Hughes, TJR (1995) A case study in parallel computation: Viscous flow around an Onera M6 wing. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 21: pp. 877884
 Behr, M, Tezduyar, TE (1994) Finite element solution strategies for largescale flow simulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 112: pp. 324
 Kennedy, JG, Behr, M, Kalro, V, Tezduyar, TE (1994) Implementation of implicit finite element methods for incompressible flows on the CM5. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 119: pp. 95111
 Johnson, AA, Tezduyar, TE (1997) 3D simulation of fluidparticle interactions with the number of particles reaching 100. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 145: pp. 301321
 Tezduyar, TE (1999) CFD methods for threedimensional computation of complex flow problems. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 81: pp. 97116
 Tezduyar, T, Osawa, Y (1999) Methods for parallel computation of complex flow problems. Parallel Comput 25: pp. 20392066
 Hoerner, SF (1993) Fluid dynamic drag. Hoerner Fluid Dynamics, Bakersfield
 Karypis, G, Kumar, V (1998) A fast and high quality multilevel scheme for partitioning irregular graphs. SIAM J Sci Comput 20: pp. 359392
 Moorman CJ (2010) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of the Orion spacecraft parachutes. PhD thesis, Rice University
 Title
 Computational Methods for Parachute Fluid–Structure Interactions
 Journal

Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 1 , pp 125169
 Cover Date
 20120301
 DOI
 10.1007/s1183101290704
 Print ISSN
 11343060
 Online ISSN
 18861784
 Publisher
 Springer Netherlands
 Additional Links
 Topics
 Industry Sectors
 Authors

 Kenji Takizawa ^{(1)}
 Tayfun E. Tezduyar ^{(2)}
 Author Affiliations

 1. Department of Modern Mechanical Engineering and Waseda Institute for Advanced Study, Waseda University, 161 NishiWaseda, Shinjukuku, Tokyo, 1698050, Japan
 2. Mechanical Engineering, Rice University, MS 321, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX, 77005, USA