Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): posttreatment follow-up care among Latina and non-Latina White women
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
There is a lack of information about posttreatment care among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). This study compares posttreatment care by ethnicity–language and physician specialty among Latina and White women with DCIS.
Latina and White women diagnosed with DCIS between 2002 and 2005 identified through the California Cancer Registry completed a telephone survey in 2006. Main outcomes were breast surveillance, lifestyle counseling, and follow-up physician specialty.
Of 742 women (396 White, 349 Latinas), most (90 %) had at least one clinical breast exam (CBE). Among women treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS; N = 503), 76 % had received at least two mammograms. While 92 % of all women had follow-up with a breast specialist, Spanish-speaking Latinas had the lowest specialist follow-up rates (84 %) of all groups. Lifestyle counseling was low with only 53 % discussing exercise, 43 % weight, and 31 % alcohol in relation to their DCIS. In multivariable analysis, Spanish-speaking Latinas with BCS had lower odds of receiving the recommended mammography screening in the year following treatment compared to Whites (OR 0.5; 95 % CI, 0.2–0.9). Regardless of ethnicity–language, seeing both a specialist and primary care physician increased the odds of mammography screening and CBE (OR 1.6; 95 % CI, 1.2–2.3 and OR 1.9; 95 % CI, 1.3–2.8), as well as having discussions about exercise, weight, and alcohol use, compared to seeing a specialist only.
Most women reported appropriate surveillance after DCIS treatment. However, our results suggest less adequate follow-up for Spanish-speaking Latinas, possibly due to language barriers or insurance access.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
Follow-up with a primary care provider in addition to a breast specialist increases receipt of appropriate follow-up for all women.
- Leonard GD, Swain SM. Ductal carcinoma in situ, complexities and challenges. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(12):906–20. CrossRef
- Virnig BA, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(3):170–8. CrossRef
- Morrow M, et al. Standard for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS). CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52(5):256–76. CrossRef
- Kerlikowske K, et al. Characteristics associated with recurrence among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(22):1692–702. CrossRef
- Wang SY, et al. Tumor characteristics as predictors of local recurrence after treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;127(1):1–14. CrossRef
- Kane RL, et al. The impact of surgery, radiation, and systemic treatment on outcomes in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(41):130–3. CrossRef
- Claus EB, et al. The risk of a contralateral breast cancer among women diagnosed with ductal and. Breast. 2003;12:451–6. CrossRef
- Li CI, et al. Risk of invaive breast carcinoma among women diagnosed wth ductal carcinoma in situ and lobular carcinoma in situ, 1988–2001. Cancer. 2006;106:2104–12. CrossRef
- Innos K, Horn-Ross PL. Risk of second primary breast cancers among women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;111(3):531–40. CrossRef
- Khatcheressian JL, et al. American society of clinical oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(31):5091–7. CrossRef
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical guidelines in oncology: breast cancer May 5, 2012; Available from: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf. Accessed 19 Aug 2012
- George SM, et al. Postdiagnosis diet quality, the combination of diet quality and recreational physical activity, and prognosis after early-stage breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22(4):589–98. CrossRef
- Bertram LA, et al. Physical activity, additional breast cancer events, and mortality among early-stage breast cancer survivors: findings from the WHEL Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22(3):427–35. CrossRef
- Sternfeld B, et al. Physical activity and risk of recurrence and mortality in breast cancer survivors: findings from the LACE study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(1):87–95. CrossRef
- Kwan ML, et al. Alcohol consumption and breast cancer recurrence and survival among women with early-stage breast cancer: the life after cancer epidemiology study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(29):4410–6. CrossRef
- Holmes MD, et al. Physical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. JAMA. 2005;293(20):2479–86. CrossRef
- Chlebowski RT, Aiello E, McTiernan A. Weight loss in breast cancer patient management. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(4):1128–43. CrossRef
- Li CI, et al. Epidemiologic and molecular risk factors for contralateral breast cancer among young women. Br J Cancer. 2003;89(3):513–8. CrossRef
- Nekhlyudov L, et al. Adherence to long-term surveillance mammography among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(19):3211–6. CrossRef
- Kagay CR, Quale C, Smith-Bindman R. Screening mammography in the American elderly. Am J Prev Med. 2006;31(2):142–9. CrossRef
- Wells KJ, Roetzheim RG. Health disparities in receipt of screening mammography in Latinas: a critical review of recent literature. Cancer Control. 2007;14(4):369–79.
- Whitman S, et al. Mammography screening in six diverse communities in Chicago—a population study. Cancer Detect Prev. 2007;31:166–72. CrossRef
- González P, Borrayo EA. The role of physician involvement in Latinas’ mammography screening adherence. Women’s Health Issues. 2010;21(2):165–70. CrossRef
- Smith-Bindman R, et al. Does utilization of screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer? Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(8):541–53.
- Mack KP, et al. Adherence to recent screening mammography among Latinas: findings from the California Women’s Health Survey. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009;18(3):347–54. CrossRef
- Hollowell K, et al. American society of clinical oncology-recommended surveillance and physician specialty among long-term breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2010;116(9):2090–8.
- Kaplan CP, et al. Selection of treatment among Latina and non-Latina White women with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011;20(2):215–23. CrossRef
- Sangha O, et al. The self-administered comorbidity questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49(2):156–63. CrossRef
- Cummings SR, et al. Prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: approaches to estimating and reducing risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(6):384–98. CrossRef
- Willett WC, et al. Moderate alcohol consumption and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1987;316(19):1174–80. CrossRef
- Feigelson HS, et al. Alcohol consumption increases the risk of fatal breast cancer (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2001;12(10):895–902. CrossRef
- Field TS, et al. Under utilization of surveillance mammography among older breast cancer survivors. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(2):158–63. CrossRef
- Ganz PA, Hahn EE. Implementing a survivorship care plan for patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(5):759–67. CrossRef
- Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): posttreatment follow-up care among Latina and non-Latina White women
Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Volume 7, Issue 2 , pp 219-226
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Posttreatment care
- Language barriers
- Health disparities
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 1545 Divisadero Street, 94143-0320, San Francisco, CA, USA
- 2. Medical Effectiveness Research Center for Diverse Populations, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- 3. Center for Aging in Diverse Communities, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- 4. UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
- 5. Department of Health Evidence and Policy, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- 6. Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- 7. Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA
- 8. School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA