Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quality of life among breast cancer patients with lymphedema: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome instruments and outcomes

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Lymphedema following breast cancer surgery remains a common and feared treatment complication. Accurate information on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes among patients with lymphedema is critically needed to inform shared medical decision making and evidence-based practice in oncologic breast surgery. Our systematic review aimed to (1) identify studies describing HRQOL outcomes in breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) patients, (2) assess the quality of these studies, and (3) assess the quality and appropriateness of the patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments used.

Methods

Using the PRISMA statement, we performed a systematic review including studies describing HRQOL outcomes among BCRL patients. Studies were classified by levels of evidence and fulfillment of the Efficace criteria. PRO instruments were assessed using the COSMIN criteria.

Results

Thirty-nine studies met inclusion criteria, including 8 level I and 14 level II studies. Sixteen of 39 studies were compliant with the Efficace criteria. Seventeen HRQOL instruments were used, two specific to lymphedema patients. Exercise and complex decongestive therapy treatment interventions were associated with improved HRQOL.

Conclusions

High-quality data on HRQOL outcomes is required to inform surgical decisions for breast cancer management and survivors. Of the lymphedema-specific PRO instruments, the Upper Limb Lymphedema 27 (ULL-27) was found to have strong psychometric properties. Future studies should strive to use high-quality condition- specific PRO instruments, follow existing guidelines for HRQOL measurement and to consider economic burdens of BCRL.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

As lymphedema may develop many years after breast cancer surgery, the ULL-27 may offer greater content validity for use in survivorship research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cancer Facts & Figures 2011. American Cancer Society. Atlanta, 2011.

  2. Ahmed RL, Prizment A, Lazovich D, Schmitz KH, Folsom AR. Lymphedema and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: the Iowa Women’s Health Study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(35):5689–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rockson SG. Lymphedema. Am J Med. 2001;110(4):288–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hormes JM, Bryan C, Lytle LA, et al. Impact of lymphedema and arm symptoms on quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Lymphology. 2010;43(1):1–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Winters ZE, Benson JR, Pusic AL. A systematic review of the clinical evidence to guide treatment recommendations in breast reconstruction based on patient- reported outcome measures and health-related quality of life. Ann Surg. 2010;252(6):929–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pusic A, Liu JC, Chen CM, et al. A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in head and neck cancer surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;136(4):525–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Efficace F, Bottomley A, Osoba D, et al. Beyond the development of health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) measures: a checklist for evaluating HRQOL outcomes in cancer clinical trials—does HRQOL evaluation in prostate cancer research inform clinical decision making? J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(18):3502–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):e1–e34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. Evidence-based review methodology (Chap. 3). http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/ptsafety/chap3.htm. Accessed 23 Oct 2012.

  10. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Speck RM, Gross CR, Hormes JM, et al. Changes in the Body Image and Relationship Scale following a one-year strength training trial for breast cancer survivors with or at risk for lymphedema. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;2:421–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim do S, Sim YJ, Jeong HJ, Kim GC. Effect of active resistive exercise on breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(12):1844–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tidhar D, Katz-Leurer M. Aqua lymphatic therapy in women who suffer from breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema: a randomized controlled study. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2010;18(3):383–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McClure MK, McClure RJ, Day R, Brufsky AM. Randomized controlled trial of the breast cancer recovery program for women with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Am J Occup Ther. 2010;64(1):59–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsai HJ, Hung HC, Yang JL, Huang CS, Tsauo JY. Could Kinesio tape replace the bandage in decongestive lymphatic therapy for breast-cancer-related lymphedema? A pilot study. Support Care Cancer. 2009;11:1353–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McKenzie DC, Kalda AL. Effect of upper extremity exercise on secondary lymphedema in breast cancer patients: a pilot study. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(3):463–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams AF, Vadgama A, Franks PJ, Mortimer PS. A randomized controlled crossover study of manual lymphatic drainage therapy in women with breast cancer-related lymphoedema. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2002;11(4):254–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vassard D, Olsen MH, Zinckernagel L, Vibe-Petersen J, Dalton SO, Johansen C. Psychological consequences of lymphoedema associated with breast cancer: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(18):3211–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sagen A, Karesen R, Sandvik L, Risberg M. Changes in arm morbidities and health-related quality of life after breast cancer surgery: a five-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(15):e20602.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Paskett ED, Naughton MJ, McCoy TP, Case LD, Abbott JM. The epidemiology of arm and hand swelling in premenopausal breast cancer survivors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(4):775–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim SJ, Yi CH, Kwon OY. Effect of complex decongestive therapy on edema and the quality of life in breast cancer patients with unilateral leymphedema. Lymphology. 2007;40(3):143–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheema BS, Gaul CA. Full-body exercise training improves fitness and quality of life in survivors of breast cancer. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(1):14–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Neill J, Beatus J. The effects of complete decongestive physical therapy treatment on edema reduction, quality of life, and functional ability of persons with upper extremity lymphedema. J Women’s Health Phys Therapy. 2006;30(1):5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Brorson H, Ohlin K, Olsson G, Langstrom G, Wiklund I, Svensson H. Quality of life following liposuction and conservative treatment of arm lymphedema. Lymphology. 2006;39(1):8–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilburn O, Wilburn P, Rockson SG. A pilot, prospective evaluation of a novel alternative for maintenance therapy of breast cancer-associated lymphedema. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Strauss-Blasche G, Gnad E, Ekmekcioglu C, Hladschik B, Marktl W. Combined inpatient rehabilitation and spa therapy for breast cancer patients: effects on quality of life and CA 15–3. Cancer Nurs. 2005;28(5):390–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mondry TE, Riffenburgh RH, Johnstone PA. Prospective trial of complete decongestive therapy for upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer therapy. Cancer J. 2004;10(1):42–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Turner J, Hayes S, Reul-Hirche H. Improving the physical status and quality of life of women treated for breast cancer: a pilot study of a structured exercise intervention. J Surg Oncol. 2004;86(3):141–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Coster S, Poole K, Fallowfield LJ. The validation of a quality of life scale to assess the impact of arm morbidity in breast cancer patients post-operatively. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001;68(3):273–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Velanovich V, Szymanski W. Quality of life of breast cancer patients with lymphedema. Am J Surg. 1999;177(3):184–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mirolo BR, Bunce IH, Chapman M, et al. Psychosocial benefits of postmastectomy lymphedema therapy. Cancer Nurs. 1995;18(3):197–205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Beaulac SM, McNair LA, Scott TE, LaMorte WW, Kavanah MT. Lymphedema and quality of life in survivors of early-stage breast cancer. Arch Surg. 2002;137(11):1253–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nesvold IL, Foss SD, Holm I, Naume B, Dahl AA. Arm/shoulder problems in breast cancer survivors are associated with reduced health and poorer physical quality of life. Acta Oncol. 2010;49(3):347–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nesvold IL, Reinertsen KV, Fossa SD, Dahl AA. The relation between arm/shoulder problems and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;5(1):62–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chachaj A, Malyszczak K, Pyszel K, et al. Physical and psychological impairments of women with upper limb lymphedema following breast cancer treatment. Psychooncology. 2010;19(3):299–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mak SS, Mo KF, Suen JJ, Chan SL, Ma WL, Yeo W. Lymphedema and quality of life in Chinese women after treatment for breast cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009;13(2):110–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Paim CR, de Paula Lima ED, Fu MR, de Paula Lima A, Cassali GD. Post lymphadenectomy complications and quality of life among breast cancer patients in Brazil. Cancer Nurs. 2008;31(4):302–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pyszel A, Malyszczak K, Pyszel K, Andrzejak R, Szuba A. Disability, psychological distress and quality of life in breast cancer survivors with arm lymphedema. Lymphology. 2006;39(4):185–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ridner SH, Dietrich MS, Kidd N. Breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema self-care: education, practices, symptoms, and quality of life. Support Care Cancer. 2011;19(5):631–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Karadibak D, Yavuzsen T, Saydam S. Prospective trial of intensive decongestive physiotherapy for upper extremity lymphedema. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97(7):572–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dawes DJ, Meterissian S, Goldberg M, Mayo NE. Impact of lymphoedema on arm function and health-related quality of life in women following breast cancer surgery. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(8):651–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Heiney SP, McWayne J, Cunningham JE, et al. Quality of life and lymphedema following breast cancer. Lymphology. 2007;40(4):177–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ridner SH. Quality of life and a symptom cluster associated with breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema. Support Care Cancer. 2005;13(11):904–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wilson RW, Hutson LM, Vanstry D. Comparison of 2 quality-of-life questionnaires in women treated for breast cancer: the RAND 36-Item Health Survey and the Functional Living Index-Cancer. Phys Ther. 2005;85(9):851–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pain SJ, Vowler SL, Purushotham AD. Is physical function a more appropriate measure than volume excess in the assessment of breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL)? Eur J Cancer. 2003;39(15):2168–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kwan W, Jackson J, Weir LM, Dingee C, McGregor G, Olivotto IA. Chronic arm morbidity after curative breast cancer treatment: prevalence and impact on quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(20):4242–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kirshbaum M. The development, implementation and evaluation of guidelines for the management of breast cancer related lymphoedema. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 1996;5(4):246–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Launois R, Megnigbeto AC, Pocquet K, Alliot F. A specific quality of life scale in upper limb lymphoedema: the ULL-27 questionnaire. Lymphology. 2002;35(1–760):181–7.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schipper H, Clinch J, McMurray A, Levitt M. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: the Functional Living Index-Cancer: development and validation. J Clin Oncol. 1984;2(5):472–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Cemal Y, Pusic A, Mehrara BJ. Preventative measures for lymphedema: separating fact from fiction. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(4):543–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea L. Pusic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pusic, A.L., Cemal, Y., Albornoz, C. et al. Quality of life among breast cancer patients with lymphedema: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome instruments and outcomes. J Cancer Surviv 7, 83–92 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-012-0247-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-012-0247-5

Keywords

Navigation