Journal of Cancer Survivorship

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 112–112

Erratum to: An update of controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

  • Rebecca M. Speck
    • Division of Clinical EpidemiologyUniversity of Pennsylvania
  • Kerry S. Courneya
    • Faculty of Physical Education and RecreationUniversity of Alberta
  • Louise C. Mâsse
    • Centre for Community Child Health ResearchUniversity of British Columbia
  • Sue Duval
    • Division of Epidemiology and Community HealthUniversity of Minnesota
    • Division of Clinical EpidemiologyUniversity of Pennsylvania
    • Center for Clinical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsUniversity of Pennsylvania
Erratum

DOI: 10.1007/s11764-010-0137-7

Cite this article as:
Speck, R.M., Courneya, K.S., Mâsse, L.C. et al. J Cancer Surviv (2011) 5: 112. doi:10.1007/s11764-010-0137-7

Erratum to: J Cancer Surviv

DOI 10.007/s11764-009-0110-5

In the original paper of the article “An update of controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” pubished in J Cancer Surviv (2010) 4:87–100, a reference contributing data to the manuscript was erroneously left out of the References.

The publication, Mutrie, N., Campbell, A. M., Whyte, F., McConnachie, A., Emslie, C., Lee, L., Kearney, N., Walker, A., & Ritchie, D. (2007). Benefits of supervised group exercise programme for women being treated for early stage breast cancer: pragmatic randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 334 (7592), 517–520, was used for data abstraction and should have been included in the References. The Mutrie et al, publication reported on a high quality, during treatment intervention that contributed descriptive data for Table 1, quality data for Table 2, and outcomes data for the calculation of effect sizes reported in Table 3.

The authors apologize for this error and any confusion it may have caused.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010