The views of bowel cancer survivors and health care professionals regarding survivorship care plans and post treatment follow up
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Goals of work
Increasing numbers of people survive cancer beyond diagnosis and treatment. Many survivors have ongoing needs and they may encounter fragmented, poorly coordinated follow up care. Survivorship care plans (SCP) have been promoted as a key aspect of survivorship care. This study aimed to survey key stakeholders in the care of people with colorectal cancer (survivors, primary care providers and hospital-based healthcare professionals) regarding follow-up and SCP.
Patients and methods
In study 1, cancer survivors completed a questionnaire regarding their follow-up and experiences during survivorship. Participants’ primary care physicians completed a phone interview regarding proposed SCP elements. A subgroup of survivors reviewed a sample SCP and participated in a phone interview regarding this. In study 2, healthcare professionals working with colorectal cancer patients completed a questionnaire regarding follow-up and proposed elements of a SCP.
Twenty survivors completed the questionnaire, 14 primary care providers completed a phone interview and 12 survivors reviewed the sample SCP.
Ninety-five healthcare professionals (30 medical professionals and 65 nurses) completed the questionnaire. There was strong support for core elements of the SCP. Additionally, nurses and survivors expressed support for supportive care and psychosocial elements. There was lack of consensus regarding who should prepare and discuss the SCP.
There is strong support for the development and use of SCPs for bowel cancer survivors. There is some variation in opinion regarding ideal content of the SCP, who might prepare it, and how it might be discussed and utilised.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
Overcoming identified barriers to implementing SCPs for bowel cancer survivors is necessary for high quality cancer care.
- Erikson C, Salsberg E, Forte G, Bruinooge S, Goldstein M. Future supply and demand for oncologists: Challenges to assuring access to oncology services. J Oncol Pract. 2007;3:79–86. doi:10.1200/JOP.0723601. CrossRef
- Australian Institute of Health & Welfare.Cancer in Australia: an overview 2006. Cancer series no. 37. cat. no. CAN32. Canberra. 2007.
- Australian Institute of Health & Welfare.Cancer survival and prevalence in Australia. Cancer Series no. 42. cat. no. CAN38. Canberra. 2008.
- Hewitt, M.E., Greenfield, S., & Stovall, E.From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in transition: National Academics Press. 2005.
- American Society of Clinical Oncology. (2005). Colon Cancer Surveillance J Oncol Pract, 1, 179.
- Ganz PA, Hahn EE. Implementing a survivorship care plan for patients with breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008;26:759–767. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.14.2851. CrossRef
- Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Boyes A, Bonevski B, Burton L, Cook P. The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group. Cancer. 2000;88:226–237. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000101)88:1<226::AID-CNCR30>3.0.CO;2-P.
- Hewitt ME, Ganz PA. Implementing Cancer Survivorship Care Planning: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007.
- Hewitt ME, Bamundo A, Day R, Harvey C. Perspectives on post-treatment cancer care: qualitative research with survivors, nurses, and physicians. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007;25:2270–2273. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.10.0826. CrossRef
- Warren JL, Mariotto AB, Meekins A, Topor M, Brown ML. Current and future utilization of services from medical oncologists. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008;26:3242–3247. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.14.6357. CrossRef
- Oeffinger KC, McCabe MS. Models for delivering survivorship care. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006;24:5117–5124. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.07.0474. CrossRef
- Grunfeld E, Levine MN, Julian JA, Coyle D, Szechtman B, Mirsky D, et al. Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006;24:848–855. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2235. CrossRef
- Wattchow DA, Weller DP, Esterman A, Pilotto LS, McGorm K, Hammett Z, et al. General practice vs surgical-based follow-up for patients with colon cancer: randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Cancer. 2006;94:1116–1121. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603052. CrossRef
- Nissen MJ, Beran MS, Lee MW, Mehta SR, Pine DA, Swenson KK. Views of primary care providers on follow-up care of cancer patients. Fam Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;39(7):477–82.
- Jefford M, Baravelli C, Dudgeon P, Dabscheck A, Evans M, Moloney M, et al. Tailored chemotherapy information faxed to general practitioners improves confidence in managing adverse effects and satisfaction with shared care: results from a randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008;26:2272–2277. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7710. CrossRef
- The views of bowel cancer survivors and health care professionals regarding survivorship care plans and post treatment follow up
Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Volume 3, Issue 2 , pp 99-108
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Post treatment
- Colorectal cancer
- Primary care physician
- Patient care planning
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Nursing and Supportive Care Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- 3. Division of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A’Beckett Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 8006, Australia
- 2. Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- 4. Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia