Skip to main content
Log in

Capillary Curves for Ex-situ Washing of Oil-Coated Particles

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Surfactants and Detergents

Abstract

The oil removal efficiency for the ex situ extraction of bitumen from oil sands, or ex situ washing of oil-contaminated sand and related processes is determined by the balance of forces at the oil/water and solid/fluid interfaces. The objective of this work is to estimate the balance of forces at the interface using dimensionless numbers, and their use in evaluating and engineering ex situ soil washing processes. To this end, bitumen was removed from bitumen-coated sand particles using a two-step process. In the first step, the particles were mixed with a suitable solvent (toluene) used, primarily, to reduce the viscosity of bitumen. The particles were then mixed with water or an aqueous surfactant solution capable of producing low interfacial tensions with the solvent-bitumen mixture. The fraction of oil retained after washing was evaluated as a function of interfacial tension, solvent/bitumen ratio, mixing time, mixing velocity, and particle size. These ex situ washing conditions were normalized using dimensionless film and particle-based Weber and Capillary numbers. The fraction of oil retained by the particles was plotted against these dimensionless numbers to generate capillary curves similar to those used in enhanced oil recovery. These curves reveal the existence of a critical film-based Weber number and a particle-based Capillary number that can be used in the design or evaluation of soil washing processes. The film-based Weber number also explained literature data that associates interfacial tension with the removal of oil from oil-based drill cuttings, as well as field observations on the role that particle size plays on the removal of oil in soil washing operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fingas M (2001) The basics of oil spill cleanup. Lewis Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ornitz B, Champ M (2002) Oil spills first principles: prevention and best response. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sittig M (1974) Oil spill prevention and removal handbook. Noyes Data Corporation, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breuel A (1981) Oil spill cleanup and protection techniques for shorelines and marshlands. Noyes Data Corporation, Park Ridge

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robert J (1990) Oil spill response guide. Noyes Data Corporation, Park Ridge

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tuler S, Webler T (2009) Stakeholder perspectives about marine oil spill response objectives: a comparative Q study of four regions. J Conting Crisis Manag 17:95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Canada Environment (1978) The impact and cleanup of oil spills on Canadian shorelines: a summary. Environmental Canada, Ottawa, ON

    Google Scholar 

  8. Acosta E, Harwell J, Scamehorn J, Sabatini D (2007) Application of microemulsions in cleaning technologies and environmental remediation. In: Johansson I, Somasundaran P (eds) Handbook for cleaning and decontamination of surfaces. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 831–884

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson L (1994) The role of oil detachment mechanisms in determining optimum detergency conditions. J Colloid Interface Sci 163:61–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rybinski W (2007) Physical aspects of cleaning processes. In: Johansson I, Somasundaran P (eds) Handbook for cleaning and decontamination of surfaces. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith P, Van de Ven T (1985) The separation of a liquid drop from a stationary solid sphere in a gravitational field. J Colloid Interface Sci 105:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Holmberg K (1998) Quarter century progress and new horizons in microemulsions. In: Shah DO (ed) Micelles, microemulsions, and monolayers. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 161–192

    Google Scholar 

  13. Niven R, Khalili N, Hibbert D (2000) Mixed solid/dispersed phase particles in multiphase fluidized beds. Part 1. Chem Eng Sci 55:3013–3032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Niven R, Khalili N, Hibbert D (2000) Mixed solid/dispersed phase particles in multiphase fluidized beds. Part 2. Chem Eng Sci 55:3033–3051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang M, Huang C, Shu H (2000) Effects of surfactants on extraction of phenanthrene in spiked sand. Chemosphere 41:1295–1300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bragato M, El Seoud O (2003) Formation, properties, and “ex situ” soil decontamination by vegetable oil-based microemulsions. J Surfactants Deterg 6:143–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Childs J, Acosta E, Scamehorn J, Sabatini D (2005) Surfactant-enhanced treatment of drill cuttings. J Energy Res Technol 127:153–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Khalladi R, Benhabiles O, Bentahar F, Moulai-Mostefa N (2009) Surfactant remediation of diesel fuel polluted soil. J Hazard Mater 164:1179–1184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Morris P, Tookey D, Walsh T (2005) The warren spring laboratory beach material washing plant for shoreline cleanup. In: Proceedings of the 2005 International Oil Spill Conference, p 9042

  20. Pennell K, Pope G, Abriola L (1996) Influences of viscous and buoyancy forces on the mobilization of residual tetrachloroethylene during surfactant flushing. Environ Sci Technol 20:1328–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Childs J, Acosta E, Knox R, Harwell J, Sabatini D (2004) Improving the extraction of tetrachloroethylene from soil columns using surfactant gradient systems. J Contam Hydrol 71:27–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Anton L, Hilfer R (1999) Trapping and mobilization of residual fluid during capillary desaturation in porous media. Phys Rev E 59:6819–6823

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Walstra P (1993) Principles of emulsion formation. Chem Eng Sci 48:333–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kiran S, Acosta E, Moran K (2009) Study of solvent-bitumen-water rag layers. Energy Fuels 23:3139–3149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mossop G (1980) Geology of the Athabasca oil sands. Science 207:145–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kiran S, Acosta E, Moran K (2009) Evaluating the hydrophilic-lipophilic nature of asphaltenic oils and naphthenic amphiphiles using microemulsion models. J Colloid Interface Sci 336:304–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bird R, Stewart W, Lightfoot E (2002) Transport phenomena, 2nd edn. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Swank R, Roth G (1954) Apparatus for measuring relative blood viscosity. Rev Sci Instrum 25:1020–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Acosta E, Szekeres E, Harwell J, Grady B, Sabatini D (2009) Morphology of ionic microemulsions: comparison of SANS studies and the net-average curvature (NAC) model. Soft Matter 5:551–561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosen M (2004) Surfactants and interfacial phenomena. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Acosta E, Harwell J, Sabatini D (2004) Self-assembly in linker-modified microemulsions. J Colloid Interface Sci 274:652–664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Angle C, Lue L, Dabros T, Hamza H (2005) Viscosities of heavy oils in toluene and partially deasphalted heavy oils in heptol in a study of asphaltenes self-interactions. Energy Fuels 19:2014–2020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fan E, Bussmann M, Acosta E (2011) Equilibrium positions of drops attached to spheres immersed in a uniform laminar flow. Can J Chem Eng 89:707–716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tongcumpou C, Acosta E, Quencer L, Joseph A, Scamehorn J, Sabatini D, Yanumet N, Chavadej S (2005) Microemulsion formation and detergency with oily soils: III. performance and mechanisms. J Surfactants Deterg 8:147–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dai D, Chung K (1995) Bitumen-sand interaction in oil sand processing. Fuel 74:1858–1864

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Spelt P (2006) Shear flow past two-dimensional droplets pinned or moving on an adhering channel wall at moderate Reynolds numbers: a numerical study. J Fluid Mech 561:439–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2012) Cost and performance report: soil washing at the King of Prussia technical corporation superfund site. http://www.clu-in.org/products/costperf/SOILWASH/Kop.htm. Accessed 18 Mar 2014

  38. Vertase FLI Ltd. (2012) Soil washing (Scrubbing). http://www.vertasefli.co.uk/soil-washing-c53.html. Accessed 18 Mar 2014

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the American Chemical Society-Petroleum Research Fund and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for their financial support and Syncrude Canada for providing bitumen samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edgar Acosta.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quraishi, S., Bussmann, M. & Acosta, E. Capillary Curves for Ex-situ Washing of Oil-Coated Particles. J Surfact Deterg 18, 811–823 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-015-1704-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-015-1704-8

Keywords

Navigation