Skip to main content
Log in

Open production: scientific foundation for co-creative product realization

  • Production Process
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Globalization and the use of technology call for an adaptation of value creation strategies. As the potential for rationalization and achieving flexibility within companies is to the greatest possible extent exhausted, approaches to the corporate reorganization of value creation are becoming increasingly important. In this process, the spread and further development of information and communication technology often provide the basis for a reorganization of cross-company value nets and lead to a redistribution of roles and tasks between the actors involved in value creation. While cooperative, decentralized and self-organizing value creation processes are in fact being promoted, the associated potential for development and production engineering is being underestimated and hence not implemented sufficiently. This contribution will introduce a value creation taxonomy and then, using its notion and structure, describe the emerging transformations in value creation on the basis of case studies. Finally an adequate framework for analysing and configuring value creation will be presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grossman L (2006) TIME’S Person of the year: you. Time Mag

  2. Anderson C (2010) In the next industrial revolution, atoms are the new bits. Wired Mag

  3. http://creativecommons.org/international/

  4. Malone E, Lipson H (2007) Fab@home: the personal desktop fabricator kit. Rapid Prototyp J 13(4):245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sells E, Smith Z, Bailard S, Bowyer A, Olliver V (2009) RepRap: the replicating rapid prototyper—maximizing customizability by breeding the means of production. In: Piller FT, Tseng MM (eds) Handbook of research in mass customization and personalization. World Scientific, London, pp 568–580

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Wagner C, Nyhuis P (2009) A systematic approach to analysis and design of global production networks. Prod Eng Res Dev 3(3):295303

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wiendahl H-P, Lutz S (2002) Production in networks. Ann CIRP 51(2):573–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleischer J, Herm M, Ude J (2007) Business capabilities as configuration elements of value added networks. Prod Eng Res Dev 1(2):187–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schuh G, Gottschalk S (2008) Production engineering for self-organizing complex systems. Prod Eng Res Dev 2(4):431–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ueda K, Takaneka T, Váncza J, Monostori L (2009) Value creation and decision-making in sustainable society. Ann CIRP 58(1):681–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ueda K, Kito T, Takaneka T (2008) Modelling of value creation based on emergent synthesis. Ann CIRP 57(1):473–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Piller FT (2006) Mass customization. DUV, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pine BJ (1993) Mass customization: the new frontier in business competition. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  14. Normann R, Ramirez R (1994) Designing interactive strategy: from value chain to value constellation. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  15. Milgrom P, Roberts J (1995) Complementarities and fit-strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J Account Econ 19(2–3):179–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Porter ME (1985) Competitive advantage. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Spur G (1997) Optionen zukünftiger industrieller Produktionssysteme. Forschungsberichte der interdisziplinären Arbeitsgruppen der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 4th edn. Akademie, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tapscott D, Williams AD (2006) Wikinomics: how mass collaboration changes everything. Portfolio, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Howe J (2008) Crowdsourcing: why the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. Crown Publishing Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Benkler Y (2002) Coase’s Penguin, or: Linux and ‘the nature of the firm’. Yale Law J 112(3):369–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Toffler A (1981) The third wave. Pan Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  22. Toffler A (1995) Das Ende der Romantik. Zukunftsforscher Alvin Toffler über das Überleben in der Informationsgesellschaft. Spieg Spec 3:60

    Google Scholar 

  23. Voß GG, Rieder K (2005) Der arbeitende Kunde. Wenn Konsumenten zu unbezahlten Mitarbeitern werden, Campus, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  24. Padberg A (2000) Strategische Unternehmensnetzwerke versus Cross-border-Unternehmensaquisitionen. DUV, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ulrich H (2001) Gesammelte Schriften—Management: Aufsätze 2. Teil, Haupt, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  26. Redlich T, Wulfsberg JP, Bruhns F-L (2009) Neue Kooperationsmuster in Entwicklung und Produktion: open production. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb ZWF 104(7–8):552–559

    Google Scholar 

  27. Redlich T, Wulfsberg JP, Bruhns F-L (2008) Virtual factory for customized open production. In: Proceeding 15th international product development management conference 2008, Hamburg

  28. Redlich T, Bruhns F-L (2008) Open production: a new broker-based approach to interactive value creation and user manufacturing. In: Proceedings ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition 2008, Boston

  29. Nagel K, Erben RF, Piller FT (1999) Produktionswirtschaft 2000. Perspektiven für die Fabrik der Zukunft. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shapiro C, Varian HR (2003) The information economy. In: Hand JRM, Lev B (eds) Intangible assets. values, measures and risks. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 48–62

    Google Scholar 

  31. Quah D (2002) Digital goods and the new economy. CEP discussion paper Nr. 563. London School of Economics, London

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shapiro C, Varian HR (1999) Information rules. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  33. Reichwald R, Piller F (2009) Interaktive Wertschöpfung. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Heller L, Nuss S (2004) Open source im kapitalismus: gute idee—falsches system? In: Lutterbeck B, Gering RA (eds) Open source Jahrbuch 2004. Lehmanns Media, Berlin, pp 385–406

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bateson JEG (1985) Self-service consumer: an exploratory study. J Retailing 61(3):69–82

    Google Scholar 

  36. Frey B (2001) Die Grenzen ökonomischer Anreize/Was Menschen motiviert. Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 05/18/2001

  37. Henkel J (2006) Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux. Res Policy 35(7):953–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Osterloh M, Rota S, Lüthi R (2006) Collective invention als neues innovationsmodell? In: Drossou O et al (eds) Die Wunderbare Welt der Wissensvermehrung. Heise, Hannover

    Google Scholar 

  39. Harhoff D, Henkel J, von Hippel E (2003) Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: how users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Res Policy 32(10):1753–1769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kleemann F, Voß GG, Rieder K (2008) Crowdsourcing und der arbeitende Konsument. Arbeits- und Industriesoziologische Studien 1(1):29–44

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lakhani KR, Wolf RG (2003) Why hackers do what they do: understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. MIT Sloan working paper No. 4425-03, Boston

  42. Luthiger SB (2006) Spass und Software-Entwicklung—Zur Motivation von Open-Source-Programmierern. PhD thesis, ETH Zürich

  43. Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 55(1):68–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Schroer J, Hertel G (2009) Voluntary engagement in an open web-based encyclopedia: wikipedians and why they do it. Media Psychol 12(1):96–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Vallance R, Kiani S, Nayfeh S (2001) Open design of manufacturing equipment. CIRP 1st International conference on agile, reconfigurable manufacturing, Ann Arbor

  46. Open design foundation. http://www.opendesign.org/odd.html

  47. Fathianathan M, Panchal JH, Nee AYC (2009) A platform for facilitating mass collaborative product realization. Ann CIRP 58(1):127–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Redlich T (2010) Gestaltungsmodell für die Wertschöpfung in der Bottom-up-Ökonomie. PhD thesis, Helmut-Schmidt-University, Hamburg

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Redlich.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wulfsberg, J.P., Redlich, T. & Bruhns, FL. Open production: scientific foundation for co-creative product realization. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 5, 127–139 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-010-0286-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-010-0286-6

Keywords

Navigation