References
Greenhalgh T (2002) Intuition and evidence–uneasy bedfellows? Br J Gen Pract 52(478):395–400
Tovey D, Churchill R, Bero L (2014) Evidence based medicine: looking forward and building on what we have learnt. BMJ 9(349):g4508
Naudet F, Falissard B, Boussageon R, Healy D (2015) Has evidence-based medicine left quackery behind? Intern Emerg Med. doi:10.1007/s11739-015-1227-3
Sackett DL, Rosenberg W, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312:71
Montori VM, Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Manns BJ, Ghali WA, Guyatt GH (2002) In the dark: the report of blinding status in randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol 55(8):787–790
Bayat Z, Lang E (2015) Guidelines helping clinicians make the GRADE. Inter Emerg Med 10(1):87–92
Brunetti M, Shemilt I, Pregno S, Vale L, Oxman AD, Lord J, Sisk J, Ruiz F, Hill S, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R, Helfand M, Harbour R, Davoli M, Amato L, Liberati A, Schunemann HJ (2013) GRADE guidelines: considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 66(2):140–150
Conflict of interest
The Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Statement of human and animal rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with human and animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lang, E.S., Santa-Cruz, J.S. Evidence-based medicine remains one’s best defense against quackery. Intern Emerg Med 10, 635–636 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-015-1274-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-015-1274-9