An unusual case presenting with hypertensive crisis
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Guasti, L., Simoni, C., Scamoni, C. et al. Int Emergency Med (2007) 2: 29. doi:10.1007/s11739-007-0006-1
- 301 Downloads
Presentation and history
Prof. Achille Venco, Prof. Luigina Guasti: A 67-year-old woman was seen at our hospital for an outpatient evaluation. She had a recent history of hypertensive crises (mean blood pressure peaks of 230/120 mmHg). She also complained of several symptoms associated with the hypertensive spells, such as fatigue, malaise, irritability, profuse sweating, tremulousness, dyspnoea and abdominal pain, all of them lasting about one hour and with a spontaneous recovery.
She was married, and had no medical history. She did not smoke or consume alcohol. She was not taking any medication and had no allergies.
On examination, blood pressure and heart rate were normal (120/70 mmHg; 64 beats/min), as were the other vital signs. The chest was clear to auscultation, and heart sounds were normal without murmurs. The abdomen was plain and not tender, without masses or organomegalies.
Results of urinalysis, complete blood count, serum electrolyte levels, hepatic-function and renal-function tests showed no abnormalities.
A 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was then performed (Spacelabs 90207-30, with recording of blood pressure every 15 min), revealing a normotensive state throughout the registration (24 h mean blood pressure: 125±12/68±8 mmHg; preserved nocturnal blood pressure fall). An echocardiogram revealed normal parietal thickness and function and a radiograph of the chest showed no abnormalities.
Discussion for differential diagnosis
Prof. Luigina Guasti, Prof. Anna Maria Grandi, Dr. Cinzia Simoni, Dr. Mariagrazia Cimpanelli, Dr. Chiara Crespi: The patient’s history was suggestive of secondary forms of hypertension, so we performed the following examinations, with results within the normal range: urinary catecholamines and vanillymandelic acid, 24-h urine-free cortisol, plasma renin activity and aldosterone with their ratio, plasma thyroid hormones. As the results were within the normal ranges, and the clinical presentation was particularly consistent with a preliminary diagnosis of pheochromocytomas, we repeated the urine collection for catecholamines, with normal results. Moreover, we evaluated plasma 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid in the hypothesis of the presence of a carcinoid tumour. In addition, plasma IGF-1 was determined to exclude excessive GH production.
One month later, the patient experienced one episode of loss of consciousness, immediately after getting out of bed during the night, with a consequent fall and fracture of her wrist. The blood pressure measured immediately after the acute episode was 90/60 mmHg. One week before this episode, she had started to have difficulty swallowing food and drink and mild dysphonia had developed.
During the subsequent six-month period, the patient reported another five hypertensive crises. During one of them she was evaluated in the emergency department of our hospital.
She was anxious, presented with profound malaise and profuse sweating, and her blood pressure was 260/140 mmHg, with the pulse 60 beats/min. Neurologic examination did not reveal pathologic findings. The remainder of the clinical evaluation was normal. Nevertheless, a brain CT scan was performed in the emergency ward, showing normal results.
Because of the suspicion of a renal or cortico-adrenal gland disease, determining the clinical presentation, we ordered an abdominal ultrasonography with Doppler examination of renal arteries, and, to further exclude the presence of a catecholamine-releasing tumour, which remained the strongest clinical suggestion despite the previous negative results of urinary catecholamines, repeated urine collections for catecholamines (also during the day of the crisis) and 131I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine scintiscan were performed, without pathological results.
We decided to start an anti-hypertensive treatment with a low dose of carvedilol, which the patient tolerated well.
Further investigations and preliminary findings
Prof. Achille Venco, Prof. Luigina Guasti, Dr. Cinzia Simoni, Prof. Carlo Scamoni, Prof. Giustino Tomei: On the occasion of a more severe crisis occurring a few weeks later, we admitted the patient to hospital for observation.
During the month after surgery the baseline blood pressure (treatment with carvedilol 25 mg and furosemide 25 mg/day) was normal; however the patient experienced 2 further crises of general malaise associated with high blood pressure levels. The swallowing impairment and disruption in talking worsened after surgery.
Presumptive diagnosis and subsequent tests
Prof. Achille Venco, Prof. Luigina Guasti, Dr. Simona Sarzi Braga, Dr. Roberto Pedretti: On the basis of both the history and the recent finding of anatomic involvement of the baroreflex arc, Prof. Venco and Prof. Guasti made a presumptive diagnosis of “baroreflex failure” and asked Dr. Pedretti and Dr. Sarzi to confirm the diagnosis. On the basis of the scientific literature on this peculiar form of impairment in baroreflex function, they proposed the pharmacological study of baroreflex sensitivity using the phenylephrine method [1, 2].
Prof. Achille Venco, Prof. Luigina Guasti: During the first months of the clinical presentation of the case reported here, no anamnestic clue, apart from a nonspecific hypotensive episode, could suggest an involvement of the baroreflex arc in determining the severe hypertensive spells experienced by the patient, which seemed to be more consistent with a diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. Thus the baroreflex impairment preceded the clinical diagnosis of brain tumour mixed cranial nerve neuroma and the neurosurgery by a few months. The results obtained with the phenylephrine method confirmed the preliminary diagnosis of baroreflex failure.
Discussion of diagnosis
Prof. Achille Venco, Prof. Luigina Guasti, Dr. Simona Sarzi Braga, Dr Luca T. Mainardi: Our diagnosis of baroreflex failure is based on several symptoms (hypertensive crisis associated with tremulousness, irritability, dizziness and profuse sweating, hypotensive episodes, impaired swallowing capacity with cough and disruption in talking) that were clinically documented in our patient and worsened after surgery.
The clinical diagnosis was confirmed by pharmacological baroreflex testing. Several methods have been described for the assessment of vagal reflexes, and among these the bolus injection of vasoactive drugs is the one that has been more extensively used in clinical settings. This method has been in fact used in a large number of patients with different cardiovascular diseases, including myocardial infarction, heart failure and hypertension.
Patients with heart failure show lower slopes for baroreflex sensitivity and older subjects or patients with stable hypertension have a blunted response to phenylephrine. However, our patient showed normal cardiac function and normal/low blood pressure between the hypertensive spells. Moreover, although only a few papers are focused on the study of the pathophysiology of the baroreflex arc in healthy older subjects and uncertainty still remains at least partly due to the different methods used, James et al.  reported values significantly higher than that observed in our patient (7.7 vs. 3 ms/mmHg) in normotensive individuals aged 70 years studied with the Oxford Technique; this finding suggests a marked impairment of the baroreflex gain in our case (of an otherwise healthy 67-year-old woman).
In addition, as Robertson and co-workers  expressed reduction of heart rate in beats/min in relation with a 25-mmHg increase in blood pressure, limiting our analysis to this pressure range, we observed a reduction of 3.5 beats/min. This value is much lower than those reported both for normal individuals and for patients with stable hypertension and is close to those reported for baroreflex failure.
Baroreflex failure is a relatively rare condition. In the few cases reported in the literature [3, 5–7] the loss of buffering ability is usually secondary to iatrogenic causes such as carotid body tumour resection, neck irradiation, surgical section of glossopharyngeal nerve, carotid by-pass surgery, and unilateral or bilateral carotid endarterectomy [8–12]. Moreover, rare reports describe this syndrome as due to degenerative neurologic disorders involving the brain stem, brain stem stroke or genetic diseases [13–19].
Because of the different possible manifestations of this condition, the differential diagnosis is often difficult . The commonest pattern is that of hypertensive crisis, with profound general malaise, during which the systolic blood pressure could exceed 300 mmHg and is often >250 mmHg . Another presentation is volatile hypertension. Baseline blood pressure could be normal to elevated but the patient experiences hypertensive spells, lasting minutes to hours, often accompanied by tachycardia. These pressure surges are often elicited by mental or physical stresses. Some patients show an orthostatic tachycardia, defined as an increase in heart rate by more than 30 beats/min from the supine to the upright position. Finally, a rare presentation is due to an increased parasympathetic tone with severe bradycardia and asystolia. These patients show hypotension and bradycardia, sometimes leading to a syncope.
Management and follow-up
Although the few cases in the literature seem to indicate clonidine as an optimal treatment of hypertension associated with baroreflex failure , this patient was treated with low doses of carvedilol and furosemide (2 drugs that may determine an improvement in baroreflex sensitivity) because these drugs were able to satisfactorily control the symptoms related to the hypertensive spells, which were extremely poorly tolerated by the patient. The crises are now less frequent and the patient and her husband have learned to manage the anxiety that followed her profound malaise and to treat them with short-acting benzodiazepines. Moreover, an increasingly quieter lifestyle has been useful in reducing the spells. The disruption in talking and cough are the main problems at the moment.
Baroreflex failure is a relatively infrequent/underdiagnosed disease. We propose that examination of the patient should include neuroradiologic evaluation of the ponto-cerebellar angulus when baroreflex failure is clinically suspected or in cases of recurrent hypertensive spells not explained by more frequent clinical disorders.