Mencius and Dewey on Moral Perception, Deliberation, and Imagination
- Amit Chaturvedi
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
I argue against interpretations of Mencius by Liu Xiusheng and Eric Hutton that attempt to make sense of a Mencian account of moral judgment and deliberation in light of the moral particularism of John McDowell. These interpretations read Mencius’s account as relying on a faculty of moral perception, which generates moral judgments by directly perceiving moral facts that are immediately intuited with the help of rudimentary and innate moral inclinations. However, I argue that it is a mistake to identify innate moral inclinations as the foundational source of moral judgments and knowledge. Instead, if we understand that for Mencius an individual’s natural dispositions (xing 性) have a relational element, then the normativity of moral judgments can be seen as stemming from the relationships that constitute the dispositions of each individual. Finally, this essay elaborates on John Dewey's account of moral deliberation as moral imagination, an account which also takes the relational quality of natural dispositions as its starting point, in order to suggest the vital role of imagination for Mencius’s own account of moral deliberation.
- Behuniak, James. 2004. Mencius on Becoming Human. Albany: SUNY Press.
- Bloom, Irene. 2002. “Biology and Culture in the Mencian View of Human Nature.” In Mencius: Contexts and Interpretations. Edited by Alan K. L. Chan. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
- Dewey, John. 1922. Human Nature and Conduct. New York: The Modern Library.
- _____. 1960. Theory of the Moral Life. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
- Hutton, Eric L. 2002. “Moral Connoisseurship in Mengzi.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Edited by Xiusheng Liu and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
- Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2002. Ethics in the Confucian Tradition: The Thought of Mengzi and wang Yangming. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
- Kim, Myeong-seok. 2010. “What Cèyǐn zhī xīn (Compassion/Familial Affection) Really Is.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9.4: 407-425.
- Lau, D.C. 1970. Mencius. London: Penguin Books.
- Liu, Xiusheng. 2002. “Mengzian Internalism.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Edited by Xiusheng Liu and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
- McDowell, John. 1998. Mind, Value, and Reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Nuyen, A.T. 2009. “Moral Obligation and Moral Motivation in Confucian Role-Based Ethics.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8.1: 1-11.
- Robins, Dan. 2001. “The Debate Over Human Nature in Warring States China.” Ph.D. Diss., University of Hong Kong.
- _____. 2011. “The Warring States Concept of Xing.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10.1: 31-51.
- Van Norden, Bryan. 2007. Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Wallace, R. Jay. 1991. “Virtue, Reason, and Principle.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21.4: 469-95
- Welchman, Jennifer. 2010. “Dewey’s Moral Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Dewey. Edited by Molly Cochran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Wong, David B. 2002. “Reasons and Analogical Reasoning in Mengzi.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Edited by Xiusheng Liu and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
- _____.2004. “Relational and Autonomous Selves.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 31.4: 419-432. CrossRef
- Mencius and Dewey on Moral Perception, Deliberation, and Imagination
Volume 11, Issue 2 , pp 163-185
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Moral judgment and motivation
- Quan 權
- Analogical extension
- Xing 性
- Amit Chaturvedi (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Philosophy Department, University of Hawai’i at Manoa, 2530 Dole Street, Sakamaki D-301, Honolulu, HI, 96822-2383, USA