Setting the Record Straight: Confucius’ Notion of Ren
- Shirong Luo
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Comparative studies involving early Confucian ethics often appear to assume that it is a unified approach to morality. This essay challenges that assumption by arguing that Confucius had a significantly different conception of ren, commonly viewed as central to Confucian ethics, from that of Mencius. It is generally accepted that ren has two senses: in a narrow sense, it is the virtue of benevolence (or compassion); in a broad sense, it is the all-encompassing ethical ideal. Both senses fail to capture Confucius’ conception of ren, for the narrow sense fits only Mencius’ understanding of ren, while the broad sense lacks emphasis and precision. I propose a third sense of ren, that is, ren as an integral, higher-order virtue with respect as its most salient component. This sense of ren is more in keeping with the textual evidence in the Analects. It played a key role in Confucius’ political-moral thinking and made his doctrine diverge considerably from that of Mencius, who understood ren primarily as compassion.
- Chan, Wing-tsit. 1955. “The Evolution of the Confucian Concept Jen.” Philosophy East & West 4: 295-319. CrossRef
- Chan, Sin Yee. 2006. “The Confucian Notion of Jing 敬 (Respect).” Philosophy East & West 56: 229-252. CrossRef
- Dawson, Raymond, trans. 2001. The Analects. New York, New York: Oxford University Press.
- Gu, Yankui 谷衍奎. 2008. Etymological Dictionary of Chinese Characters 漢字源流字典. Beijing 北京: Yuwen Chubanshe 語文出版社.
- Herr, Ranjoo Seodu. 2003. “Is Confucianism Compatible with Care Ethics? A Critique.” Philosophy East & West 53: 471-489. CrossRef
- Lau, D. C., trans. 1979. The Analects (Lunyu). New York, New York: The Penguin Group
- _____. 1970. Mencius. New York, New York: the Penguin Group.
- Li, Chenyang. 1994. “The Confucian Concept of Jen and the Feminist Ethics of Care: A Comparative Study.” Hypatia 9: 70-89. CrossRef
- Rosemont Jr., Henry, and Roger T. Ames, trans. 2009. The Chinese Classic of Family Reverence: A Philosophical Translation of the Xiaojing. Honolulu, Hawai’i: University of Hawai’i Press.
- Star, Daniel. 2002. “Do Confucians Really Care? A Defense of the Distinctiveness of Care Ethics: A Reply to Chenyang Li.” Hypatia 17: 77-106. CrossRef
- Watson, Burton, trans. 2007. The Analects of Confucius. New York, New York: Columbia University Press.
- Yang, Bojun 楊伯峻. 2006. Translation and Annotations of the Analects 論語譯註. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.
- Yuan, Lijun. 2002. “Ethics of Care and Concept of Jen: A Reply to Chenyang Li.” Hypatia 17: 107-129.
- Setting the Record Straight: Confucius’ Notion of Ren
Volume 11, Issue 1 , pp 39-52
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Confucian Ethics
- Shirong Luo (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Philosophy Department, Simmons College, 300 The Fenway, Boston, MA, 02115-5898, USA