Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Two Senses of Justice: Confucianism, Rawls, and Comparative Political Philosophy

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues that a comparative study of the idea of a sense of justice in the work of John Rawls and the early Chinese philosopher Kongzi is mutually beneficial to our understanding of the thought of both figures. It also aims to provide an example of the relevance of moral psychology for basic questions in political philosophy. The paper offers an analysis of Rawls’s account of a sense of justice and its place within his theory of justice, focusing on the features of this capacity and how it develops. It then provides an account of the sense of justice in Kongzi’s thought as it is seen in the Analects. Finally, it shows how examining the similarities and differences between the two accounts can deepen our understanding of both views, as well as our appreciation for the importance of understanding how a sense of justice develops.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, Roger T., and Henry Rosemont, Jr. 1998. The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deigh, John. 1996. “Love, Guilt, and the Sense of Justice.” In The Sources of Moral Agency: Essays in Moral Psychology and Freudian Theory. Edited by John Deigh. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Ruiping. 2003. “Social Justice: Rawlsian or Confucian?” In Comparative Approaches to Chinese Philosophy. Edited by Mou Bo. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Samuel, ed. 1999. John Rawls: Collected Papers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Friedman, Marilyn. 1993. What Are Friends for? Feminist Perspectives on Personal Relationships and Moral Theory. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, A.C. 2002. “The Background of the Mencian Theory of Human Nature.” Reprinted in Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Edited by Liu Xiusheng and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

  • Haldane, John. 1996. “The Individual, the State, and the Common Good.” Social Philosophy and Policy 13: 59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, David L., and Roger T. Ames. 1999. The Democracy of the Dead: Dewey, Confucius, and the Hope for Democracy in China. Chicago: Open Court Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Yan 何晏. 1981. Collected Explications of the Analects 論語集解. Taibei 台北: Taiwan Shangwu Yinshuguan 台灣商務印書館.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, Virginia. 1993. Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society, and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, Eric L., trans. 2001. “Xunzi.” In Ivanhoe and Bryan W. Van Norden 2001.

  • Ivanhoe, Philip J. 1999. “The Concept of de (“Virtue”) in the Laozi.” In Religious and Philosophical Aspects of the Laozi. Edited by Mark Csikszentmihalyi and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _______. 2000. Confucian Moral Self Cultivation. Second Edition. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

  • _______. 2002a. “Confucian Self Cultivation and Mengzi’s Notion of Extension.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Edited by Liu Xiusheng and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

  • _______. 2002b. Ethics in the Confucian Tradition: The Thought of Mengzi and W ang Yangming, Second Edition. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

  • _______. 2006. “Filial Piety as a Virtue.” In Working Virtue: Virtue Ethics and Contemporary Moral Problems. Edited by Rebecca Walker and Philip J. Ivanhoe. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Ivanhoe, Philip J., and Bryan W. Van Norden, eds. 2001. Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

  • Jaggar, Alison. 1983. Feminist Politics and Human Nature. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1997. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated and edited by Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kline, T.C. III. 2000. “Moral Agency and Motivation in the Xunzi.” In Kline and Ivanhoe 2000.

  • Kline, T.C. III, and Philip J. Ivanhoe, eds. 2000. Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

  • Kyte, Richard. 1992. “Guilt, Remorse, and the Sense of Justice.” Contemporary Philosophy 14.5: 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D.C. 2000. “Theories of Human Nature in Mengzi and Xunzi.” In Kline and Ivanhoe 2000.

  • Legge, James, trans. 1971. “Confucian Analects.” In The Chinese Classics. Vol. I. New York: Dover Publications.

  • Liu, Xiusheng. 2003. Mencius, Hume, and the Foundations of Ethics. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nivison, David S. 1996. The Ways of Confucianism. Edited by Bryan W. Van Norden. Chicago: Open Court Press.

  • Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peerenboom, R.P. 1990. “Confucian Justice: Achieving a Humane Society.” International Philosophical Quarterly 30:17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, Jean. 1932. The Moral Judgment of the Child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1997. “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” In Freeman 1999.

  • _______. 1958. “Justice as Fairness.” In Freeman 1999.

  • _______. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Edited by Erin Kelly. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • _______. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • _______. 1963. “The Sense of Justice.” In Freeman 1999.

  • _______. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

  • Rosemont, Henry, Jr. 1988. “Why Take Rights Seriously: A Confucian Critique.” In Human Rights and the World’s Religions. Edited by Leroy S. Rouner. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

  • _______. 1991. “Rights-Bearing Individuals and Role-Bearing Persons.” In Rules, Rituals, and Responsibility: Essays Dedicated to Herbert Fingarette. Edited by Mary I. Bockover. LaSalle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • _______. 2004. “Whose Democracy? Which Rights? A Confucian Critique of Modern Western Liberalism.” In Confucian Ethics: A Comparative Study of Self, Autonomy, and Community. Edited by Kwong-loi Shun and David B. Wong. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Rousseau, J.J. 1979. Emile. Translated by Allan Bloom. New York: Basic Books.

  • Shun, Kwong-loi. 1997. Mencius and Early Chinese Thought. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slingerland, Edward G., trans. 2003. Confucius Analects. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

  • Sober, Elliott, and David Sloan Wilson. 1998. Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Norden, Bryan W. 2000. “Mengzi and Xunzi: Two Views of Human Agency.” In Kline and Ivanhoe 2000.

  • Van Norden, Bryan W., trans. 2001. “Mengzi (Mencius).” In Ivanhoe and Van Norden 2001.

  • Williams, Bernard. 1983. “Morality and Social Justice.” Tanner Lectures given at Harvard University.

  • Wong, David B. 2000. “Xunzi on Moral Motivation.” In Kline and Ivanhoe 2000.

  • Zhu, Xi 朱熹. 1985. Collected Commentaries on the Four Books 四書集注. Changsha 長沙: Hunan Sheng Xinhua Shudian 湖南省新華書店.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin M. Cline.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cline, E.M. Two Senses of Justice: Confucianism, Rawls, and Comparative Political Philosophy. Dao 6, 361–381 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-007-9021-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-007-9021-1

Keywords

Navigation