Skip to main content
Log in

Markets before economic growth: the grain market of medieval England

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cliometrica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

England from 1200 to 1600 was a society caught in apparent technological stasis, typical of the pre-industrial world. Many believe this pre-industrial stagnation was the result of political and cultural constraints, such as those on the operation of markets. Indeed medieval English law outlawed many arbitrage activities in markets. The paper shows using information of grain yields and prices at 227 different locations that the most important of all markets, that for grain, was nevertheless both extensive and relatively efficient as early as 1209. Whatever the rhetoric of medieval law and social thought the real effect of constraints on the operation the grain market seems to have been minimal. England had an elaborate market economy at least 500 years before it had sustained economic growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Thus, Douglass North in his Nobel Prize lecture noted that “Most societies throughout history got ‘stuck’ in an institutional matrix that did not evolve into the impersonal exchange essential to capturing the productivity gains that came from the specialization and division of labor that have produced the Wealth of Nations.” North (1994, p. 364).

  2. Bridbury (1992, p. 264).

  3. Campbell et al. (1993) gives a nice description of the operation of the market. See pp. 87–106.

  4. Gras (1915, p. 72).

  5. Kowaleski (2003, p. 189).

  6. There is a similar notation in 1347-8. Beveridge MSS., Box P3. Thorold Rogers annotates some of his grain sale listings with “King,” but such annotations are rare, and the reported prices are not much less than others of the same year. See, for example, Rogers (1866, p. 98), Cuxham, 1331-2.

  7. Campbell et al. (1993, pp. 193–198) give transport costs. Water transport costs were even lower, being only about one-tenth of the land transport costs.

  8. See Beveridge (1930), Farmer (1977), Farmer (1991a, b, pp. 499–501).

  9. If grain typically flows from a rural location to urban markets, then its price level will on average be lower than those in the urban markets by the amount of the transport cost.

  10. Note also that there is no sudden rise in prices after harvest as Persson (1996) finds, such a sudden rise being inconsistent with efficient storage. Place fixed effects were used in estimating the monthly prices.

  11. Brunt and Cannon (1999) looking at the price rise in the years 1264–1400 with the Thorold Rogers data use different procedures but derive results that are broadly similar to these.

  12. This result follows since lnP t  = a + b(g + lnhY t−1 + u t−1) + e t , and since lnP t−1 = a + blnY t−1 + e t−1, so that lnY t−1 = (lnP t−1  a  e t−1)/b, the connection between lnP t and lnP t−1 follows.

  13. There is also a compensating upward bias in the correlation created by the fact that the account year used by Farmer to construct yearly prices does not coincide exactly with the harvest year. Thus, the prices of 1348, for example, include some prices determined by the harvest of 1349 in the last month of the year. This would drive up the autocorrelation by about 0.083.

  14. This was done by including in the regression year trends up to a cubic term.

  15. There were currency devaluations which would affect the autocorrelation of the raw prices, such as in 1351, 1411, and 1464. But by calculating, prices relative to long-term trends should control for long-term movements in currency values.

References

Manuscript

  • Beveridge Papers, Robbins Library, London School of Economics

  • Farmer Papers, University of Saskatchewan Library, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Secondary

  • Bateman VN (2011) The evolution of markets in early modern Europe, 1350–1800: a study of wheat prices. Econ Hist Rev 64(2):447–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge WH (1930) Wheat measures in the Winchester rolls. Econ Hist 5:19–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden P (1967) Statistics. In: Thirsk J (ed) The agrarian history of England and Wales, vol 4. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1500–1640

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden P (1985) Statistics. In: Thirsk J (ed) The agrarian history of England and Wales, vol 5 (Part 2), 1640–1750. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 828–831

  • Boxall R (1998) Grains post-harvest loss assessment in Ethiopia. Final report. Project No. T0725 (NRI Report No. 2377). University of Greenwich, Natural Resources Institute, London

  • Bridbury AR (1992) Markets and freedom in the middle ages. In: Bridbury AR (ed) The English economy from Bede to the Reformation. Boydell Press, Woodbridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright H (1856) Statistics of the Corn Trade, 1828–1855. J R Agric Soc Eng 17:2–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunt L, Cannon E (1999) A grain of truth in medieval English interest rates? Re-examining the McCloskey-Nash hypothesis. Working Paper, University of Bristol

  • Campbell B, Galloway J, Keene D, Murphy M (1993) A medieval capital and its grain supply: agrarian production and distribution in the London region c. 1300. Historical Geography Research Series, #30. Institute of British Geographers, London

  • Chilosi D, Murphy TE, Studer R, Tunçeret AC (2012) Europe’s many integrations: geography and grain markets, 1620–1913. Explorations in Economic History. doi:10.1016/j.eeh.2012.09.002

  • Clark, Gregory (1998) “Microbes and Markets: Was the Black Death an Economic Revolution?” Working Paper, University of California, Davis

  • Clark G (2010) The Macroeconomic Aggregates for England, 1209–2008. Research in Economic History 27:51–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer DL (1977) Grain yields on the Winchester manors in the later middle ages. Econ Hist Rev 30:555–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer DL (1983) Grain yields on the Westminster Abbey manors, 1271–1410. Can J Hist 18:331–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer DL (1988) Prices and wages. In: Hallam HE (ed) The agrarian history of England and Wales, vol 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1042–1350

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer DL (1991a) Marketing the produce of the countryside, 1200–1500. In: Miller E (ed) The agrarian history of England and Wales, vol 3, 1348–1500. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 324–430

  • Farmer DL (1991b) Prices and wages, 1350–1500. In: Miller E (ed) The agrarian history of England and Wales, vol 3, 1348–1500. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 431–525

  • Federico G (2011) When did European markets integrate? Eur Rev Econ Hist 15(1):93–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gras NSB (1915) The evolution of the English corn market. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey PDA (1976) The manorial records of Cuxham, Oxfordshire, circa 1200–1359. Historical Manuscripts Commission, London Joint Publication 23

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges RJ, Buzby JC, Bennett B (2010) Postharvest losses and waste in developed and less developed countries: opportunities to improve resource use. J Agric Sci 149(S1):37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacks DS (2004) Market integration in the North and Baltic seas, 1500–1800. Eur Rev Econ Hist 33(3):285–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob W (1826) Report on the trade in foreign corn, and on the agriculture of the North of Europe; to which is added, an Appendix of official document, averages of prices, shipments, stocks on hand in the various exporting countries, [etc.]. James Ridgway, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • John AH (1989) Statistical appendix. In: Mingay GE (ed) The agrarian history of England and Wales, vol 6, 1750–1850. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 972–1155

  • Kowaleski M (2003) Local markets and regional trade in medieval Exeter. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey D, Nash J (1984) Corn at interest: the extent and cost of grain storage in medieval England. Am Econ Rev 74:174–187

    Google Scholar 

  • North D (1994) Economic performance through time. Am Econ Rev 84(3):359–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson KG (1996) The seven lean years, elasticity traps, and intervention in grain markets in pre-industrial Europe. Econ Hist Rev 49(4):692–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson KG (1999) Grain markets in Europe, 1500–1900: integration and deregulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers JET (1866) A history of agriculture and prices in England, vol 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford

  • Rogers JET (1882) A history of agriculture and prices in England, vol 3. Clarendon Press, Oxford

  • Rogers JET (1888) A history of agriculture and prices in England, vol 6. Clarendon Press, Oxford

  • Titow JZ (1972) Winchester yields: a study in medieval agricultural productivity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper draws heavily on the work of four great compilers of medieval data—James Thorold Rogers, Lord Beveridge, Jan Titow, and David Farmer—without whom we would be a lot poorer. I thank Bob Allen, Peter Lindert, Deirdre McCloskey, Joel Mokyr, Alan Olmstead, Debra Swenson, Alan Taylor, and Leon Wegge for helpful suggestions. Matt Rafferty and Brian Harris provided able research assistance. Cheryl Avery of the University of Saskatchewan Library Archives was extremely helpful when I visited Saskatchewan to study the papers of the late David Farmer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory Clark.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clark, G. Markets before economic growth: the grain market of medieval England. Cliometrica 9, 265–287 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-014-0117-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-014-0117-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation