Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Web-Surfing Bariatic Patient: the Role of the Internet in the Decision-Making Process

Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Health-related information on the Internet is constantly increasing, but its quality and accountability are difficult to assess. Patients browse the Net to get more information, but the impact of the Internet on their decisions about surgical techniques, referral centers, or surgeon choice are still not clear. This study aimed to describe the role of the Internet in the decision-making process of obese patients seeking bariatric surgery.

Methods

Two hundred and twelve candidates for bariatric surgery were asked to answer a questionnaire evaluating their access to the Internet, the usefulness and trustworthiness of Internet-retrieved information, the verification of the information, and the role of the information in the decision-making process.

Results

Two hundred and twelve patients answered the questionnaire. Of these, 95.1 % had access to the Internet and 77.8 % reported having researched about bariatric surgery. Their main interests were the surgical techniques (81.4 %) and other patients’ experiences (72.3 %). The favorite Web sites were those affiliated to public hospitals or edited by other patients. The accountability of the e-information was mainly evaluated by discussion with the general practitioner (GP) (83.0 %) or family members and friends (46.8 %). One patient in four decided to undergo bariatric surgery mainly based on e-information, while discussion about treatment options with the GP and the hospital reputation were taken into account in 77.8 and 51.7 % of cases, respectively.

Conclusions

Most patients seeking bariatric surgery search for health information online. E-information seems to have an important role in the decision-making process of patients who are candidates for bariatric surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andreassen HK, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Chronaki CE, Dumitru RC, Pudule I, Santana S, et al. European citizens’ use of E-health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:53.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siliquini R, Ceruti M, Lovato E, Bert F, Bruno S, De Vito E, et al. Surfing the Internet for health information: an Italian survey on use and population choices. BMC Med Inform Decis Mark. 2011;11:21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. AlGhamdi KM, Moussa NA. Internet use by the public to search for health-related information. Int J Med Inform. 2012;81(6):363–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bell RA, Hu X, Orrange SE, Kravitz RL. Lingering questions and doubts: online information-seeking of support forum members following their medical visits. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85(3):525–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bylund CL, Gueguen JA, Sabee CM, Imes RS, Li Y, Sanford AA. Provider-patient dialogue about Internet health information: an exploration of strategies to improve the provider–patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66(3):346–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Davies E, Yeoh K-W. Internet chemotherapy information: impact on patients and health professionals. Br J Cancer. 2012;106(4):651–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL, Croyle RT, Arora NK, Rimer BK, et al. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2618–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wainstein BK, Sterling-Levis K, Baker SA, Taitz J, Brydon M. Use of the Internet by parents of paediatric patients. J Paediatr Child Health. 2006;42(9):528–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sillence E, Briggs P, Harris PR, Fishwick L. How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information? Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(9):1853–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ybarra M, Suman M. Reasons, assessments and actions taken: sex and age differences in uses of Internet health information. Health Educ Res. 2008;23(3):512–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mancini J, Noguès C, Adenis C, Berthet P, Bonadona V, Chompret A, et al. Patients’ characteristics and rate of Internet use to obtain cancer information. J Public Health (Oxford). 2006;28(3):235–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Callejas-Rubio J-L, Ríos-Fernández R, Barnosi-Marín A-C, García-Hernández F-J, Vargas-Hitos J-A, Camps-García M-T, et al. Health-related Internet use by lupus patients in southern Spain. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33(4):567–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Magnezi R, Bergman YS, Grosberg D. Online activity and participation in treatment affects the perceived efficacy of social health networks among patients with chronic illness. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(1):e12.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shaw B, Farboud A, Trinidade A, Kothari P. Internet and e-mail use in ENT: a survey of patient usage and satisfaction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269(3):1051–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alarcón-Fernández O, Alonso-Abreu I, Carrillo-Palau M, Nicolás-Pérez D, Gimeno AZ, Ramos L, et al. Internet use among patients with gastrointestinal diseases in a general hospital. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;34(10):667–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hay MC, Cadigan RJ, Khanna D, Strathmann C, Lieber E, Altman R, et al. Prepared patients: Internet information seeking by new rheumatology patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(4):575–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bert F, Gualano MR, Brusaferro S, Vito E De, Waure C De, La Torre G, et al. Pregnancy e-health: a multicenter Italian cross-sectional study on Internet use and decision-making among pregnant women. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;1013–8.

  18. Lazzati A, Guy-Lachuer R, Delaunay V, Szwarcensztein K, Azoulay D. Bariatric surgery trends in France: 2005–2011. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;10(2):328–34. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2013.07.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Haute Autorité de Santé. Obésité: prise en charge chirurgicale chez l’adulte. Recommandations de bonne pratique. Saint-Denis La …. 2009. pp. 1–263. http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/jcms/c_765529/fr/obesite-prise-en-charge-chirurgicale-chez-l-adulte. Archived at http://www.webcitation.org/6Sy9dRcxK. Accessed 2 Mar 2013.

  20. Arman S. Integrated model of social media and customer relationship management: a literature review. Int J Inform Bus Manag. 2014;6(3):118.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Luca Paolino declares no conflict of interest. Laurent Genser declares no conflict of interest. Nicola de’ Angelis declares no conflict of interest. Sylvie Fritsch declares no conflict of interest. Daniel Azoulay declares no conflict of interest. Andrea Lazzati declares no conflict of interest.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Statement of Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Paolino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paolino, L., Genser, L., Fritsch, S. et al. The Web-Surfing Bariatic Patient: the Role of the Internet in the Decision-Making Process. OBES SURG 25, 738–743 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1578-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1578-x

Keywords

Navigation