Adams, D. C. (2010). Parallel evolution of character displacement driven by competitive selection in terrestrial salamanders. BMC Evolutionary Biology,
Adams, D. C., & Collyer, M. L. (2007). The analysis of character divergence along environmental gradients and other covariates. Evolution,
Adams, D. C., & Collyer, M. L. (2009). A general framework for the analysis of phenotypic trajectories in evolutionary studies. Evolution,
Adams, D. C., & Nistri, A. (2010). Ontogenetic convergence and evolution of foot morphology in European cave salamanders (Family: Plethodontidae). BMC Evolutionary Biology,
Adams, D. C., Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. E. (2004). Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Italian Journal of Zoology,
Adams, D. C., West, M. E., & Collyer, M. L. (2007). Location-specific sympatric morphological divergence as a possible response to species interactions in West Virginia Plethodon salamander communities. Journal of Animal Ecology,
Alves, S. M., & Belo, M. (2002). Morphometric variations in the house fly, Musca domestica
(L.) with latitude. Genetica,
Anderson, M. J. (2001). A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology,
Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Berns, C. M., & Adams, D. C. (2010). Bill shape and sexual shape dimorphism between two species of temperate hummingbirds: Black-chinned Hummingbirds (Archilochus alexandri
) and Ruby-throated Hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris
). The Auk,
Bird, D. M. (2004). The bird almanac: A guide to essential facts and figures of the world’s birds. Firefly Books (U.S.) Inc, Buffalo, NY.
BirdLife International. (2012). IUCN red list for birds
. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org
on 29 May 2012.
Bleiweiss, R. (1992). Reversed plumage ontogeny in a female hummingbird- implications for the evolution of iridescent colors and sexual dimorphism. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society,
Bleiweiss, R. (1997). Covariation of sexual dichromatism and plumage colors in lekking and non-lekking birds: A comparative analysis. Evolutionary Ecology,
Bleiweiss, R. (1998). Origin of hummingbird faunas. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society,
Bleiweiss, R. (1999). Joint effects of feeding and breeding behaviour on trophic dimorphism in hummingbirds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences,
Bookstein, F. L. (1991). Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bookstein, F., Schäfer, K., Prossinger, H., Seidler, H., Fieder, M., Stringer, C., et al. (1999). Comparing frontal cranial profiles in archaic and modern Homo
by morphometric analysis. The Anatomical Record,
Brown, J. H., & Bowers, M. A. (1985). Community organization in hummingbirds: Relationships between morphology and ecology. The Auk,
Butler, M. A., Sawyer, M. A., & Losos, J. B. (2007). Sexual dimorphism and adaptive radiation in Anolis
Butler, M. A., Schoener, T. W., & Losos, J. B. (2000). The relationship between sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in Greater Antillean Anolis
Carpenter, F. L., Hixon, M. A., Paton, D. C., Temeles, E. J., & Russell, R. W. (1991). Sexual differences in resource acquisition by migrant hummingbirds. Acta XX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici,
Collins, B. G., & Paton, D. C. (1989). Consequences of differences in body mass, wing length and leg morphology for nectar-feeding birds. Austral Ecology,
Collyer, M. L., & Adams, D. C. (2007). Analysis of two-state multivariate phenotypic change in ecological studies. Ecology,
Colwell, R. K. (2000). Rensch’s Rule crosses the line: convergent allometry of sexual size dimorphism in hummingbirds and flower mites. The American Naturalist,
Darwin, C. R. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex
. London: John Murray.CrossRef
Dryden, I. L., & Mardia, K. V. (1993). Multivariate shape analysis. SankhyÄ: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A (1961–2002), 55, 460–480.
Dryden, I. L., & Mardia, K. V. (1998). Statistical analysis of shape. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Evans, M. R., Martins, T. L. E., & Haley, M. P. (1995). Inter-sexual and intra-sexual patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in the Red-billed Streamertail- should symmetry always increase with ornament size. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology,
Fairbairn, D. J. (1997). Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: Pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,
Feinsinger, P. (1978). Ecological interactions between plants and hummingbirds in a successional tropical community. Ecological Monographs,
Feinsinger, P., & Colwell, R. K. (1978). Community organization among neotropical nectar-feeding birds. American Zoologist,
Garland, T., Dickerman, A. W., Janis, C. M., & Jones, J. A. (1993). Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Systematic Biology,
Gunz, P., Mitteroecker, P., & Bookstein, F. (2005). Semi-landmarks in three dimensions. In D. E. Slice (Ed.), Modern morphometrics in physical anthropology
(pp. 73–98). New York: Kluwer.CrossRef
Hedrick, A. V., & Temeles, E. J. (1989). The evolution of sexual dimorphism in animals: Hypotheses and tests. Trends in Ecology & Evolution,
Hendry, A. P., Kelly, M. L., Kinnison, M. T., & Reznick, D. L. (2006). Parallel evolution of the sexes? Effects of predation and habitat features on the size and shape of guppies. Journal of Evolutionary Biology,
Jones, A. G., & Ratterman, N. L. (2009). Mate choice and sexual selection: What have we learned since Darwin? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Kodric-Brown, A., & Brown, J. H. (1978). Influence of economics, interspecific competition, and sexual dimorphism on territoriality of migrant Rufous Hummingbirds. Ecology,
Lovich, J. E., & Gibbons, J. W. (1992). A review of techniques for quantifying sexual size dimorphism. Growth, Development, and Aging,
McGuire, J. A., Witt, C. C., Altshuler, D., & Remsen, J. V. (2007). Phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of hummingbirds: Bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses of partitioned data and selection of an appropriate partitioning strategy. Systematic Biology,
McGuire, J., Witt, C., Remsen, J., Dudley, R., & Altshuler, D. (2009). A higher-level taxonomy for hummingbirds. Journal of Ornithology,
Potter, K. A., Bose, T., & Yamaguchi, A. (2005). Androgen-induced vocal transformation in adult female African Clawed Frogs. Journal of Neurophysiology,
R Development Core Team. (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing, version 2.11.1 R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
Rodríguez-Flores, C. I., & Stiles, G. (2005). Ecomorphological analysis of a community of hermit hummingbirds (Trochilidae, Phaethorninae) and their flowers in Colombian Amazonia. Ornitología Colombiana,
Rohlf, F. J. (1999). Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. Journal of Classification, 16, 197–223.
Rohlf, F. J. (2004). TPSSplin, version 1.20. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook.
Rohlf, F. J. (2005). TPSRelW, version 1.42. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook.
Rohlf, F. J. (2010). TPSDig2, version 2.16. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook.
Rohlf, F. J., & Marcus, L. F. (1993). A revolution in morphometrics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution,
Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. E. (1990). Extentions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology,
Selander, R. K. (1972). Sexual selection and dimorphism in birds. In B. G. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual Selection and the descent of man (1871–1971) (pp. 180–230). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Serb, J. M., Alejandrino, A., Otárola-Castillo, E., & Adams, D. C. (2011). Morphological convergence of shell shape in distantly related scallop species (Mollusca: Pectinidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society,
Slatkin, M. (1984). Ecological causes of sexual dimorphism. Evolution,
Stephens, P. R., & Wiens, J. J. (2009). Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in emydid turtles: Ecological dimorphism, Rensch’s Rule, and sympatric divergence. Evolution,
Stiles, F. G. (1983). Systematics of the southern forms of Selasphorus (Trochilidae). The Auk,
Stiles, F. G. (1995). Behavioral, ecological and morphological correlates of foraging for arthropods by the hummingbirds of a tropical wet forest. The Condor,
Stuart-Fox, D. M., & Ord, T. J. (2004). Sexual selection, natural selection and the evolution of dimorphic coloration and ornamentation in agamid lizards. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences,
Temeles, E. J., Goldman, R. S., Kudla, A. U., & Stouffer, P. C. (2005). Foraging and territory economics of sexually dimorphic Purple-throated Caribs (Eulampis jugularis
) on three Heliconia
morphs. The Auk,
Temeles, E. J., & Kress, W. J. (2003). Adaptation in a plant-hummingbird association. Science,
Temeles, E. J., Miller, J. S., & Rifkin, J. L. (2010). Evolution of sexual dimorphism in bill size and shape of hermit hummingbirds (Phaethornithinae
): A role for ecological causation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,
Temeles, E. J., & Roberts, W. M. (1993). Effect of sexual dimorphism in bill length on foraging behavior: An experimental analysis of hummingbirds. Oecologia,
Wood, G. L. (Ed.). (1983). Guinness book of animal facts and feats. New York: Sterling Publishing Co Inc.
Worthington, A. M., Berns, C. M., & Swallow, J. G. (2012). Size matters, but so does shape: Quantifying complex shape changes in a sexually selected trait in stalk-eyed flies (Diptera: Diopsidae). Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society,
Zusi, R. L., & Gill, F. B. (2009). The marvelous tail of Loddigesia mirabilis
(Trochilidae). The Auk,