, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 336-338
Date: 11 Jul 2009

The Origin(s) of Modern Amphibians: A Commentary

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access
This is an excerpt from the content

Anderson (2008) recently reviewed the controversial topic of extant amphibian origins, on which three (groups of) hypotheses exist at the moment. Anderson favors the “polyphyly hypothesis” (PH), which considers the extant amphibians to be polyphyletic with respect to many Paleozoic limbed vertebrates and was most recently supported by the analysis of Anderson et al. (2008). Another is the “temnospondyl hypothesis” (TH—lissamphibians nested within temnospondyls), most recently supported by Ruta and Coates (2007). We prefer the “lepospondyl hypothesis” (LH—lissamphibians nested within “lepospondyls”; most recently supported by Vallin and Laurin 2004 and Marjanović and Laurin 2008a). We would like to clarify important points that were not discussed in Anderson’s review, or for which crucial arguments were left out.

Anderson (2008) argues that most molecular dates favor the PH because they suggest a Devonian or Early Carboniferous diversification of Lissamphibia. This is inaccurate, since t ...