Skip to main content
Log in

Questioning Scrutiny

Bioethics, Sexuality, and Gender Identity

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The clinic is a loaded space for LGBTQI persons. Historically a site of pathology and culturally a site of stigma, the contemporary clinic for queer patient populations and their loved ones is an ethically fraught space. This paper, which introduces the featured articles of this special issue of the Journal of Bioethical Inquiry on “Bioethics, Sexuality, and Gender Identity,” begins by offering an analysis of scrutiny itself. How do we scrutinize? When is it apt for us to scrutinize? And what are the benefits and perils of clinical and bioethical scrutiny? Bearing in mind these questions, the second half of this paper introduces the feature articles in this special issue in response to such forms of scrutiny. How, why, when, and in what ways to sensitively scrutinize LGBTQI persons in the clinic are the aims of this piece.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a comprehensive analysis of the history and uses of the term “queer” in scholarly discourses, see Annamarie Jagose’s (1997) Queer Theory: An Introduction.

  2. Some areas that have received scholarly attention include: issues regarding intersex children; quarantine and policy-making decisions on AIDS in the earliest years of the epidemic; issues surrounding inclusion or exclusion from the American Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM); blood and organ donation policies; gay etiology studies; gay and transgender parenthood; gender-testing in sports; and queer comfort in the clinic. (For examples in these areas, see: Dreger 1998; Panem 1985; Matthews 1988; Rabin 1986; Spitzer 1981; Galarneau 2010; Schüklenk et al. 1997; Stein 1998; Murphy 2010; Simpson et al. 2000; and Harbin, Beagan, and Goldberg 2012.)

  3. For more information about the Project on Bioethics, Sexuality, and Gender Identity, including its consortium, visit www.queerbioethics.org.

  4. For leading approaches in queer scholarship to this painful legacy for LGBTQI persons in the clinic and beyond, see: Ahmed 2006; Epstein 1996; Gould 2009; Love 2007; Terry 1999; and Treichler 1999.

References

  • Ahmed, S. 2006. Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreger, A.D. 1998. Ambiguous sex—or ambivalent medicine? Ethical problems in the treatment of intersexuality. The Hastings Center Report 28(3): 24–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. 1996. Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1990. The history of sexuality, volume 1: An introduction. Trans. R. Hurley. New York: Vintage Press

  • Foucault, M. 1994. The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. Trans. A.M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Vintage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland-Thomson, R. 2005. Staring at the other. Disability Studies Quarterly 25(4). http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/610/787.

  • Garland-Thomson, R. 2009. Staring: How we look. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galarneau, C. 2010. Blood donation, deferral, and discrimination: FDA donor deferral policy for men who have sex with men. The American Journal of Bioethics 10(2): 29–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, D.B. 2009. Moving politics: Emotion and ACT UP’s fight against AIDS. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbin, A., B. Beagan, and L. Goldberg. 2012. Discomfort, judgment, and health care for queers. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9(2): 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, H.K. 2007. Feeling backward: Loss and the politics of queer history. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagose, A. 1997. Queer theory: An introduction. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, E. 1988. AIDS and sexual morality. Bioethics 2(2): 118–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, T.F. 2010. The ethics of helping transgender men and women have children. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53(1): 46–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J.L. 1998. The silence of the bioethicists. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 4(2): 213–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panem, S. 1985. AIDS: Public policy and biomedical research. The Hastings Center Report 15(4): 23–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, J.A. 1986. The AIDS epidemic and gay bathhouses: A constitutional analysis. Journal of Health and Political Policy Law 10(4):729–747.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J.L., A. Ljungqvist, M.A. Ferguson-Smith, et al. 2000. Gender verification in the Olympics. Journal of the American Medical Association 284(12):1568–1569.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, R.L. 1981. The diagnostic status of homosexuality in DSM-III: A reformulation of the issues. The American Journal of Psychiatry 138(2): 210–215.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schüklenk, U., E. Stein, J. Kerin, and W. Byne. 1997. The ethics of genetic research on sexual orientation. The Hastings Center Report 27(4): 6–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, E. 1998. Choosing the sexual orientation of children. Bioethics 12(1): 1–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, J. 1999. An American obsession: Science, medicine, and homosexuality in modern society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treichler, P.A. 1999. How to have theory in an epidemic: Cultural chronicles of AIDS. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlert, L., and A. Fiester. 2012a. Queer bioethics: Why its time has come. Bioethics 26(1): ii–iv.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlert, L., and A. Fiester. 2012b. Commentary: The questions we should not ask. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21(2): 282–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lance Wahlert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wahlert, L., Fiester, A. Questioning Scrutiny. Bioethical Inquiry 9, 243–248 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-012-9376-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-012-9376-9

Keywords

Navigation