Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Donation of Stem Cells and Reproductive Tissue
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Since the late 1970s, the capacity of assisted reproductive technologies to reorder the beginnings of life has generated robust, sometimes heated social debate. The new repertoires of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and oocyte donation abruptly expanded the number of potential participants in the creation of a child and radically redistributed the spaces in which ovulation, conception, pregnancy, and birth took place. They propelled existing understandings of the origins of life, women’s reproductive rights, and the structure of the family into potential disarray and hence demanded systematic social deliberation and new legislative frameworks to manage the fallout. In the late 1990s, the creation of the first human embryonic stem cell line (Thomson et al. 1998) and the first mammalian clone (Campbell et al. 1996) galvanised a similarly robust social response. Abruptly, the entities associated with the beginnings of biographical human life, particularly embryos and oocytes, could be divert
- Campbell, K.H., J. McWhir, W.A. Ritchie, and I. Wilmut. 1996. Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line. Nature 380(6569): 64–66. CrossRef
- Carroll, K., and C. Waldby. 2012. Informed consent and fresh egg-donation for stem cell research: Incorporating embodied knowledge into ethical decision-making. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9(1). doi:10.1007/s11673-011-9349-4.
- Dickenson, D. 2007. Property in the body: Feminist perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Gottweis, H., B. Salter, and C. Waldby. 2009. The global politics of human embryonic stem cell science: Regenerative medicine in transition. Basingstoke: Macmillan. CrossRef
- Naffine, N., and B. Richards. 2012. Regulating consent to organ and embryo donation: The legal dimensions of the problem. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9(1). doi:10.1007/s11673-011-9348-5.
- Porter, M., I.H. Kerridge, and C.F.C. Jordens. 2012. “Good mothering” or “good citizenship”? Conflicting values in choosing whether to donate or store umbilical cord blood. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9(1). doi:10.1007/s11673-011-9343-x.
- Roberts, C., and K. Throsby. 2008. Paid to share: IVF patients, eggs and stem cell research. Social Science & Medicine 66(1): 159–169. CrossRef
- Scully, J.L., E. Haimes, A. Mitzkat, R. Porz, and C. Rehmann-Sutter. 2012. Donating embryos to stem cell research: The “problem” of gratitude. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9(1). doi:10.1007/s11673-011-9352-9.
- Simmons, A. 2012. Do embryos have interests? Why embryos are identical to future persons but not harmed by death. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9(1). doi:10.1007/s11673-011-9336-9.
- Thomson, J.A., J. Itskovitz-Eldor, S.S. Shapiro, et al. 1998. Embryonic stem lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282(5391): 1145–1147. CrossRef
- Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Donation of Stem Cells and Reproductive Tissue
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Volume 9, Issue 1 , pp 15-17
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Stem cells
- Oocyte donation
- Reproductive technology
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- 2. Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, Medical Foundation Building (K25), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
- 3. Faculty of Law and Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Studies, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VA, Australia