Confronting Death in Legal Disputes About Treatment-Limitation in Children
- Kristin Savell
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Most legal analyses of selective nontreatment of seriously ill children centre on the question of whether it is in a child’s best interests to be kept alive in the face of extreme suffering and/or an intolerable quality of life. Courts have resisted any direct confrontation with the question of whether the child’s death is in his or her best interests. Nevertheless, representations of death may have an important role to play in this field of jurisprudence. The prevailing philosophy is to configure death as a release from a futile or painful existence and/or as a dignified end in an objectively hopeless situation. However, there can be disagreement about the meaning of death in these settings. Some parents object that death would be premature or that it represents a culpable neglect of their child. A closer examination of these discordant interpretations allows for a better comprehension of the cultural understandings that underscore clinical and legal accounts of death following end-of-life decisions.
- American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. 1994. Guidelines on foregoing life-sustaining medical treatment. Pediatrics 93(3): 532–536.
- Asch, A. 1998. Distracted by disability. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7(1): 77–87. CrossRef
- BBC News. 1999. Mother’s court battle for son’s life. BBC News, April 22. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/325852.stm. Accessed June 17, 2009.
- BBC News. 2004a. Court to rule on sick baby care. BBC News, October 13. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/north_west/3738874.stm. Accessed June 17, 2009.
- BBC News. 2004b. Hospital postpones baby court bid. BBC News, July 17. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/3931669.stm. Accessed June 17, 2009.
- BBC News. 2005. Baby Luke death “natural causes.” BBC News, May 20. Accessed April 4, 2011. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/north_west/4529687.stm.
- BBC News. 2009. RB surgery “not an option.” BBC News, November 3. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8341385.stm. Accessed April 4, 2011.
- Bridgeman, J. 2007. Parental responsibility, young children and healthcare law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Day, E. 2004. Do not resuscitate—and don’t bother consulting the family. The Telegraph, March 14. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1456791/Do-Not-Resuscitate-and-dont-bother-consulting-the-family.html. Accessed June 17, 2009.
- Doyal, L., and G. Durbin. 1998. When life may become too precious: The severely damaged neonate. Seminars in Neonatology 3(4): 275–284. CrossRef
- French, P., and R. Kayess. 2008. Deadly currents beneath calm waters: Persons with disability and the right to life in Australia. In Disabled people and the right to life—the protection and violation of disabled people’s most basic human rights, ed. L. Clements and J. Read, 57–84. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Green, J. 2008. Beyond the good death: The anthropology of modern dying. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.
- Hopkins, P.D. 1997. Why does removing machines count as “passive” euthanasia? The Hastings Center Report 27(3): 29–37. CrossRef
- Kellehear, A. 2004. Dying as a social relationship: A sociological review of debates about the determination of death. Social Science and Medicine 66(7): 1533–1544.
- Kittay, E.F. 2008. At the margins of moral personhood. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5(2–3): 137–156. CrossRef
- Koch, T. 1998. The limits of principle. Preager: Westport.
- Koch, T. 2005. The ideology of normalcy: The ethics of difference. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 16(2): 123–129. CrossRef
- McHaffie, H., I. Lang, M. Parker, and J. McMillan. 2001. Deciding for imperilled newborns: medical authority or parental autonomy? Journal of Medical Ethics 27(2): 104–109. CrossRef
- McMahan, J. 2003. The ethics of killing: Problems at the margins of life. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Morris, S. 2000. Relatives jailed for attack on doctors. The Guardian, July 15. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2000/jul/15/stevenmorris1. Accessed June 17, 2009.
- New South Wales Health Research Ethics and Public Health Training. 2005. Guidelines for end-of-life care and decision-making. Sydney: NSW Department of Health. http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/policies/gl/2005/pdf/GL2005_057.pdf.
- Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. 2004. Withholding or withdrawing life sustaining treatment in children: A framework for practice, 2nd edition. http://www.rcpch.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Witholding%20....pdf. Accessed August 21, 2011.
- Singer, P. 1995. Rethinking life and death: The collapse of our traditional ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Timmerman, S. 2005. Death brokering: Constructing culturally appropriate deaths. Sociology of Health & Illness 27(7): 993–1013. CrossRef
- Whitelaw, A. 1986. Death as an option in neonatal intensive care. The Lancet 328(8502): 328–331. CrossRef
- Wilkinson, D. 2006. Is it in the best interests of an intellectually disabled infant to die? Journal of Medical Ethics 32(8): 454–459. CrossRef
- Wilkinson, D.J., J.J. Fitzsimmons, P.A. Dargavillle, N.T. Campbell, P.M. Loughnan, P.N. McDougall, and J.F. Mills. 2006. Death in the neonatal intensive care unit: Changing patterns of end of life care over two decades. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 91(4): F268–F271. CrossRef
- Wyatt, D. 2005. Our story. Charlotte Wyatt, don’t give up on me! blog, May. http://savecharlotte.com/our-story/. Accessed June 17, 2009.
- A National Health Service Trust v D  2 FCR 577.
- Airedale NHS Trust v Bland  1 All ER 821.
- An NHS Trust v MB  EWHC 507 (Fam).
- Glass and Another v United Kingdom  1 FLR 1019.
- Portsmouth NHS Trust v Wyatt & Ors  EWHC 2247 (Fam).
- R v Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Ex parte Glass  2 FLR 905.
- Re B (A Child)  EWHC 3269 (Fam).
- Re Baby D (No 2)  FamCA 176.
- Re C (A Minor)(Wardship: Medical Treatment)  Fam 26.
- Re C (A Minor)(Medical Treatment)  1 FLR 384.
- Re J (A Minor)(Wardship: Medical Treatment)  Fam 33.
- Re K (A Child)(Withdrawal of Treatment)  EWHC 1007 (Fam).
- Re OT  EWCA Civ 409.
- Re Winston-Jones (A Child)(Medical Treatment: Parent’s Consent)  All ER 313.
- Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust v B  2 FCR 76.
- Confronting Death in Legal Disputes About Treatment-Limitation in Children
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Volume 8, Issue 4 , pp 363-377
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Death and dying
- Treatment-limitation in children
- Parental opposition
- Good death
- Legal responsibility for death
- Personhood and disability
- Industry Sectors
- Kristin Savell (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Sydney Law School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia