Austin, M., Harding S., & McElroy, C. (2003). Genebanks: A comparison of eight proposed international genetic databases. Community Genetics, 6
Australian Law Reform Commission and Australian Health Ethics Committee (ALRC/AHEC) (2003). Report No. 96, Essentially yours: The protection of human genetic information in Australia. Sydney: Australian Law Reform Commission.
National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) (2007). Available online from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/e72syn.htm
. Accessed 14/05/2007.
Hanson, S. (2004). The ethics of biobanks. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 13
Shorter Oxford English dictionary on historical principles (2002). 5th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Murray, T. (1987). On the human body as property: The meaning of embodiment, markets and the meaning of strangers. Journal of Law Reform, 20, 1055–1088.
Tutton, R. (2004). Person, property and gift: Exploring languages of tissue donation to biomedical research. In R. Tutton & O. Corrigan (Eds.), Genetic databases: Socio-ethical issues in the collections and use of DNA. London: Routledge, Chapter 2.
Korts, K., Weldon, S. & Guâmundsdóttir, M. (2004). Genetic databases and public attitudes: A comparison of Iceland, Estonia and the UK. TRAMES, 8, 131–149.
Nilstun, T., & Hermerén, G. (2006). Human tissue samples and ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 9
Barlow-Stewart, K., Taylor, S., & Otlowski, M. (2005). Knowing your genes. In S. Wilson, G. Meagher, & R. Gibson, et al. (Eds), Australian social attitudes: The first report. Sydney: University of New South Wales. Chapter 12.
Cousins, G., McGee, H., & Ring, L., et al. (2005). Public perceptions of biomedical research: A survey of the general population in Ireland. Health Services Research Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland.
Kettis-Lindblad, A., Ring, L., Viberth, E., & Hansson, M. (2006). Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think? European Journal of Public Health, 16
UNESCO Universal declaration on the human genome and human rights
(1997). Available online: http://portal.unesco.org/shs/en/ev.php-URL_ID=1881&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
. Accessed 14.5.2007.
UNESCO International declaration on human genetic data
(2003). Available online: http://portal.unesco.org/shs/en/ev.php-URL_ID=1882&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
. Accessed 14.5.2007.
Nicol, D. (2004). Property in human tissue and the right of commercialisation: The interface between tangible and intellectual property. Monash University Law Review, 30, 139–164.
Laurie, G. (2002). Genetic privacy: A challenge to medico–legal norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 315–318.
Goold, I. (2005). Sounds suspiciously like property treatment: Does human tissue fit within the common law concept of property? University of Tasmania Law Review 7 (Special issue: The mind, the body and the law) pp. 62–86.
Skene, L. (2002). Arguments against people legally ‘owning’ their own bodies, body parts and tissue. Macquarie Law Journal, 2, 165–176.
Moore v Regents of the University of California (1990). 51 Cal 3d 120 (Cal).
Kelly, R. v. (1998). 3 All ER 741, 750.
Greenberg v Miami Children’s Hospital (2003). 264 F Supp. 2d 1064 (Fla).
Washington University v William Catalona (2006). 437 F Supp 2d 985.
Charo, R. (2006). Body of research – ownership and use of human tissue. New England Journal of Medicine, 355
Chadwick, R., & Berg, K. (2001). Solidarity and equity: New ethical frameworks for genetic databases. Nature Reviews; Genetics, 2
Martin, P., Kaye, J. (1999). The use of biological sample collections and personal medical information in human genetic research. Prepared for the Wellcome Trust.
Powles, J. (2006). Rights attaching to human tissue samples in large genetic databases and the practical ramifications for consent and commercialisation. Honours thesis. Faculty of Law, University of Western Australia, and Western Australian Institute for Medical Research.
Magnusson, R. (2000). The use of human tissue samples in medical research: Legal issues for HRECs. Journal of Law and Medicine, 7, 390–403.
Fleming, J. (2006). Perspectives on tissue banks and human genetic research databases: implications for research and regulatory reform. Paper for the Centre for Law and Genetics and Australian Centre for Emerging Technologies and Society Joint Symposium, ‘Human biotechnology and public trust,’ Melbourne, November.
Fleming, J. (2006). Issues with tissue: perspectives of donors and the public towards tissue banks and human genetic research databases. Abstract no. 814, Proceedings of the Australian health and medical research congress, Melbourne.
Hoeyer, K., Olofsson, B., Mjörndal, T., & Lynöe, N. (2004). Informed consent and biobanks: A population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 32
Hoeyer, K., Olofsson, B., Mjörndal, T., & Lynöe, N. (2005). The ethics of research using biobanks: Is informed consent donors’ main interest? Archives of Internal Medicine, 65
Kaye, J. (2002). Broad consent: The only option for population genetic databases? In G. Árnason, S. Nordal, & V. Árnason (Eds.), Blood and data: Ethical, legal and social aspects of human databases, chapter 11. Reykjavík, Iceland: University of Iceland Press.
Council of Europe (1997). Convention on human rights and biomedicine.
HUGO Ethics Committee (2002). Statement on genetic databases.
Commonwealth Attorney General’s Department (2005). Australian Law Reform Commission and Australian Health Ethics Committee Report, Essentially yours: The protection of human genetic information in Australia: Government response to recommendations, Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia.
Nicol, D., Otlowski, M., & Chalmers, D. (2001). Consent, commercialisation and benefit sharing. Journal of Law and Medicine, 9
HUGO Ethics Committee (1996). Statement on the principled conduct of genetic research.
HUGO Ethics Committee (2000). Statement on Benefit Sharing.
Knoppers, B., & Fecteau, C. (2003). Human genomic databases: A global public good? European Journal of Health Law, 10
Nicol, D. (2006). Public trust, intellectual property and human genetic databanks: The need to take benefit sharing seriously. Journal of International Biotechnology Law, 3
World Health Organisation (2004). Genetic databases: Assessing the benefits and impact on human and patient rights – a WHO report. European Journal of Health Law, 11
Corrigan, O. (2006). Property matters: Public and private venture in human genetic databases. Paper for the Centre for Law and Genetics and Australian Centre for Emerging Technologies and Society Joint Symposium, ‘Human biotechnology and public trust,’ Melbourne, November.
Knoppers, B. (2003). Beyond the rhetoric: Population genetics and benefit sharing. Health Law Journal, 11
Martin, P. (2001). Genetic governance: The risks, oversight and regulation of genetic databases in the UK. New Genetics and Society, 20
Creation and governance of human genetic research databases (2006). Paris. OECD.
McHale, J. (2004). Regulating genetic databases: Some legal and ethical issues. Medical Law Review, 12
McEwen, J., & Reilly, P. (1996). Setting standards for DNA banks: Towards a model of conduct. Microbial and Comparative Genomics, 1