Abstract
The viscoelastic response of commercial aluminum alloys 7075-T6 and 2024-T3 as a function of temperature is presented. Experimental data are obtained with a dynamic-mechanical analyzer (DMA) at different loading frequencies and compared with the available transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) data. The effect of successive microstructural transformations (particle precipitation and redissolution) is revealed. An analytical model is developed, which fits the mechanical response up to 573 K (300 °C). The model takes into account the concentration of Guinier-Preston Zones (GPZ) and metastable precipitates (η′ in AA 7075-T6 and θ′/S′ in AA 2024-T3), allowing us to determine the kinetic parameters of these transformations. The activation energies were previously obtained by several authors from DSC measurements and other techniques, showing considerable dispersion. The presented data, obtained with a completely different technique, allow us to reduce the uncertainty on these data and show the potential of DMA measurements in the study of microstructural transformations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The dimensionless transformed fraction or simply transformed fraction is the ratio concentration-to-initial concentration in dissolution processes and the ratio concentration-to-final concentration in precipitation processes.
For the sake of model simplicity, for AA 7075, the third term on the r.h.s. of Eq. [6] accounts for the joint effect of GPZ I and GPZ II. For AA 2024, this term accounts for the joint effect of GPZ I, GPZ II, and GPBZ, and the last term accounts for the joint effect of θ′ and S′. This trade solution stems from the yet unknown isolated effect of each one of these particular phases on the storage modulus, to the author’s knowledge. Thus, for AA 2024, C 1 stands for the combined GPZ I, GPZ II, plus GPBZ concentration, and C 2 accounts for the combined θ′ plus S′ concentration.
From now on for AA 2024, we will use the term GPZ to refer simultaneously to GPZ and GPBZ.
The term “continuation” is preferred to “beginning” because some η′ precipitates are likely to be already present in AA 7075-T6 at RT.
Slight deviations observed in the vicinity of the upper limit (i.e., the storage modulus maximum) are likely due to the advent of secondary precipitates redissolution, which is not represented in our model.
References
A.S. Nowick and B.S. Berry: Anelastic Relaxation in Crystalline Solids, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1972.
Y.M. Soifer, N.P. Kobelev, L.G. Brodova, A.N. Mannkhin, E. Korin, and L. Soifer: Nanostruct. Mater., 1999, vol. 12, pp. 875–78.
S. Abis, M. Massazza, P. Mengucci, and G. Riontino: Scripta Mater., 2001, vol. 45, pp. 685–91.
G. Bierwagen: J. Coat. Technol., 2001, vol. 73, pp. 45–52.
A.J. Vreugdenhil, V.N. Balbyshev, and M.S. Donley: J. Coat. Technol., 2001, vol. 73, pp. 35–43.
R.M. Chlistovsky, P.J. Heffernan, and D.L. DuQuesnay: Int. J. Fatigue, 2007, vol. 29, pp. 1941–49.
E.A. Starke and J.T. Staley: Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 1996, vol. 32, pp. 131–72.
R. Ferragut, A. Somoza, and A. Dupasquier: J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 1996, vol. 8, pp. 8945–52.
T. Engdahl, V. Hansen, P.J. Warren, and K. Stiller: Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 2002, vol. 327, pp. 59–64.
C.E. Macchi, A. Somoza, A. Dupasquier, and I.J. Polmear: Acta Mater., 2003, vol. 51, pp. 5151–58.
F. Viana, A.M.P. Pinto, H.M.C. Santos, and A.B. Lopes: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1999, vol. 93, pp. 54–59.
G.W. Smith: Thermochim. Acta, 1998, vol. 317, pp. 7–23.
S. Abis, P. Mengucci, and G. Riontino: Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 1996, vol. 214, pp. 153–60.
C. Badini, F. Marino, and E. Verne: Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 1995, vol. 191, pp. 185–91.
A.K. Jena, A.K. Gupta, and M.C. Chatuverdi: Acta Metall., 1989, vol. 37, pp. 885–95.
T.J. Konno, M. Kawasaki, and K. Hiraga: J. Electron Microsc., 2001, vol. 50, pp. 105–11.
J.I. Gersten and F.W. Smith: The Physics and Chemistry of Materials, 1st ed., Wiley, New York, NY, 2001, pp. 757–67.
J.W. Christian: The Theory of Transformations in Metals and Alloys, 3rd ed., Pergamon, Oxford, U.K., 2002, pp. 532–46.
M.J. Starink and A.M. Zahra: Thermochim. Acta, 1997, vol. 292, pp. 159–68.
J.M. Papazian: Metall. Trans. A, 1982, vol. 13A, pp. 761–69.
S. Yannacopoulos, S.O. Kasap, A. Hedayat, and A. Verma: Can. Metall. Q., 1994, vol. 33, pp. 51–60.
U. Batra and S.R. Prabhakar: Trans. Indian Inst. Met., 1995, vol. 48, pp. 55–61.
E.S. Tankins and W.E. Frazier: Mater. Perform., 1987, vol. 26, pp. 37–44.
M.J. Starink and P. Vanmourik: Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 1992, vol. 156, pp. 183–94.
H.I. Aaronson and C. Laird: Trans. TMS-AIME, 1968, vol. 242, p. 1437.
Y.H. Chen and R.D. Doherty: Scripta Metall., 1977, vol. 11, pp. 725–29.
J.I. Rojas, A. Aguiar, and D. Crespo: Phys. Status Solidi C, 2011, vol. 8, pp. 3111–14.
T. Das, S. Bandyopadhyay, and S. Blairs: J. Mater. Sci., 1994, vol. 29, pp. 5680–88.
P.M. Sutton: Phys. Rev., 1953, vol. 91, pp. 816–21.
G.N. Kamm and G.A. Alers: J. Appl. Phys., 1964, vol. 35, pp. 327–30.
J.A. Brammer and C.M. Percival: Exp. Mech., 1970, vol. 10, p. 245.
Y.P. Varshni: Phys. Rev. B, 1970, vol. 2, pp. 3952–58.
A. Wolfenden and J.M. Wolla: J. Mater. Sci., 1989, vol. 24, pp. 3205–12.
T. Ozawa: Thermochim. Acta, 1992, vol. 203, pp. 159–65.
R. Graf, I.J. Polmear, and G. Thomas: J. Inst. Met., 1958, vol. 86, pp. 535–38.
V. Hansen, K. Stiller, and G. Waterloo: Mater. Sci. Forum, 2002, vols. 396–402, pp. 815–20.
E. Salamci: Mater. Sci. Technol., 2004, vol. 20, pp. 859–63.
J.M. Papazian: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1986, vol. 79, pp. 97–104.
J.M. Badia, J.M. Antoranz, and P. Tarin: Boletín Sociedad Española Cerámica Vidrio, 2004, vol. 43, pp. 224–28.
A. Charai, T. Walther, and C. Alfonso: Acta Mater., 2000, vol. 48, pp. 2751–64.
H.C. Shih, N.J. Ho, and J.C. Huang: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1996, vol. 27A, pp. 2479–94.
E.J. Mittemeijer: J. Mater. Sci., 1992, vol. 27, pp. 3977–87.
V. Dixit, R.S. Mishra, R.J. Lederich, and R. Talwar: Sci. Technol. Weld. Joi., 2009, vol. 14, pp. 346–55.
E. Hersent, J.H. Driver, and D. Piot: Scripta Mater., 2010, vol. 62, pp. 455–57.
MATLAB: The MathWorks Inc., R2010b, Natick, MA, 2010.
J.K. Park and A.J. Ardell: Metall. Trans. A, 1983, vol. 14A, pp. 1957–65.
M.M. Sharma, M.F. Amateaub, and T.J. Eden: J. Alloy. Compd., 2006, vol. 416, pp. 135–42.
H.T. Jeong, E. Fleury, W.T. Kim, D.H. Kim, and K. Hono: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn, 2004, vol. 73, pp. 3192–97.
Y. Du, Y.A. Chang, B.Y. Huang, W.P. Gong, Z.P. Jin, H.H. Xu, Z.H. Yuan, Y. Liu, Y.H. He, and F.Y. Xie: Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 2003, vol. 363, pp. 140–51.
S.K. Maloney, K. Hono, I.J. Polmear, and S.P. Ringer: Micron, 2001, vol. 32, pp. 741–47.
M. De Sanctis: Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 1991, vol. 141, pp. 103–21.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the MICINN Grant MAT2010-14907 and Generalitat de Catalunya Grant 2009SGR01251.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Manuscript submitted May 24, 2011.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rojas, J.I., Crespo, D. Modeling of the Effect of Temperature, Frequency, and Phase Transformations on the Viscoelastic Properties of AA 7075-T6 and AA 2024-T3 Aluminum Alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 43, 4633–4646 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-012-1281-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-012-1281-7