Date: 23 Mar 2012
On the Distinction Between Plasticity- and Roughness-Induced Fatigue Crack Closure
A series of experiments has been carried out to determine why some alloys display plasticity-induced fatigue crack closure (PIFCC), whereas other alloys display roughness-induced crack closure (RIFCC). Two alloys were studied, the aluminum alloy 6061-T6 (PIFCC) and a steel of comparable yield strength, S25C (RIFCC). The experiments included the determination of the crack-opening levels as a function of ΔK, da/dN as a function of ΔK eff – ΔK effth, removal of the specimen surface layers, removal of the crack wake, the determination of crack front shapes, crack surface roughness profiles, and the degree of lateral contraction in the plastic zone at a crack tip. Based on crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) considerations, it is concluded that PIFCC is favored in alloys of low modulus and relatively low yield strength. In addition, a low strain-hardening rate such as for the 6061 alloy will favor PIFCC. Steels with a higher modulus and a higher strain-hardening rate than 6061 will, in general, exhibit RIFCC, even at comparable yield strength levels. In ferritic steels, the fracture surface roughness and consequently the crack-opening level will increase as the coarseness of the microstructure increases.
Manuscript submitted July 4, 2011.
J.C. Newman and W. Elber, eds.: Mechanics of Fatigue Crack Closure, ASTM STP 982, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 1988.
R.C. McClung and J.C. Newman, eds.: Advances in Fatigue Crack Closure Measurement and Analysis, vol. 2, ASTM STP 1343, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 1999.
W. Elber: Eng. Fract. Mech., 1970, vol. 2, pp. 37–45.CrossRef
W. Elber: In: Damage Tolerance in Aircraft Structures, ASTM STP 486, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 1971, pp. 230–42.
H. Bao: Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 1994.
K. Minakawa, G. Levan, and A.J. McEvily: Metall. Trans. A, 1986, vol. 17A, pp. 1787–95.CrossRef
B. Budiansky and J. Hutchinson: J. Appl. Mech., 1978, vol. 45, pp. 267–76.CrossRef
M. Renauld: M.S. Thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 1993.
J. Schivje: In: Mechanics of Fatigue Crack Closure, ASTM STP 982, J. Newman and W. Elber, eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 1988, pp. 5–34.
A.J. McEvily: Fatigue Frac. Eng. Mat. Struct., 2009, vol. 32, pp. 284–85.CrossRef
A.J. McEvily, D. Eifler, and E. Macherauch: Eng. Fract. Mech., 1991, vol. 40, pp. 571–84.CrossRef
ASTM E399-90, Standard Test Method for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials, 1991 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, pp. 500–02.
ASTM E399-90, Standard Test Method for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness, Metallic Materials, 1991 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, pp. 506–09.
R. Bowman, S.D. Antolovich, and R.C. Brown: Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 31, 1988, pp. 703–12.CrossRef
ASTM E647-05, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates, 2005 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, pp. 1–45.
A.J. McEvily, Jr.: Met. Sci., 1977, vol. 11, nos. 8–9, p. 274.
A.J. McEvily and Z. Yang: Met. Soc., 1987, pp. 3–12.
S. Ishihara and A.J. McEvily: Int. J. Fatigue, 2002, vol. 24, pp. 1169–74.CrossRef
A.J. McEvily, S. Ishihara, M. Endo, H. Sakai, and H. Matsunaga: Int. J. Fatigue, 2007, vol. 29, pp. 2737–45.CrossRef
A.J. McEvily, S. Ishihara, and M. Endo: Int. J. Fatigue, 2005, vol. 27, pp. 862–66.CrossRef
D. Broek and J. Schijve: The Effect of Sheet Thickness on Fatigue Crack Propagation in 2024-T3 Alclad Sheet Material, NLR_TRM2129, National Aerospace Laboratory, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1963.
T.C. Lindley and C.E. Richards: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1974, vol. 14, pp. 281–93.CrossRef
S. Matsuoka and K. Tanaka: Eng. Fract. Mech., 1980, vol. 13, pp. 293–306.CrossRef
D. Rhodes and J.C. Radon: Effect of Some Secondary Test Variables on Fatigue Crack Growth, Fracture Mechanics, 14th Symp., vol. 2: Testing and Applications, ASTM STP 791, ASTM, 1983, pp. II-33 to II-46.
Z. Yang and A.J. McEvily: Effects of Load and Thermal Histories, P.K. Liaw and T. Nicholas, eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1987, pp. 3–12.
A.J. McEvily, S. Ishihara, and Y. Mutoh: Int. J. Fatigue, 2004, vol. 26, pp. 1311–19.CrossRef
Z. Yang and A.J. McEvily: J. Mech. Behav. Mater., 1991, vol. 3, nos. 2–3, pp. 85–102.CrossRef
P.C. Paris and L. Hermann: In: Fatigue Thresholds, Fundamental and Engineering Applications, J. Backlund, A.F. Blom, and C.J. Beevers, eds., Engineering Materials Advisory Services, Worcester, U.K., 1981, pp. 1–33.
- On the Distinction Between Plasticity- and Roughness-Induced Fatigue Crack Closure
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A
Volume 43, Issue 9 , pp 3086-3096
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors