Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of Web 2.0 technologies for knowledge sharing in SMEs

  • Published:
Service Business Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Web 2.0 technologies are increasingly being used within all knowledge management processes. This paper extends previous studies on the use of internet technologies and knowledge management by analyzing factors affecting knowledge sharing through Web 2.0 technologies within small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Drawing upon the technology-organization-environment framework, a model is developed to examine how distinct contextual factors influence the use of Web 2.0 technologies for knowledge sharing. A data set of Spanish SMEs is used to test the conceptual model and hypotheses. Results show that knowledge sharing through Web 2.0 technologies emerges from internal organizational and technological resources rather than from external pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alavi M, Leidner DE (2001) Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Q 25(1):107–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1998) On evaluation of structural equations models. J Acad Mark Sci 16(1):74–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordonaba-Juste V, Lucia-Palacios L, Polo-Redondo Y (2012) Antecedents and consequences of e-business use for European retailers. Internet Res 22(5):532–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin RW (1980) Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In: Triandis HC, Berry JW (eds) Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, 2. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, pp 349–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan FTS, Chong AY-L, Zhou L (2012) An empirical investigation of factors affecting e-collaboration diffusion in SMEs. Int J Prod Econ 138(2):329–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong AYL, Ooi KB, Lin B, Tang SY (2009) Influence of interorganizational relationships on SMEs’ e-business adoption. Internet Res 19(3):313–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins CJ, Smith KG (2006) Knowledge exchange and combination: the role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Acad Manag J 49(3):544–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colomo-Palacios R, Casado-Lumbreras C, Soto-Acosta P, Misra S, García-Peñalvo FJ (2012) Analyzing human resource management practices within the GSD context. J Glob Inf Technol Manag 15(3):30–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Colomo-Palacios R, Casado-Lumbreras C, Soto-Acosta P, Misra S (2013) Providing knowledge recommendations: an approach for informal electronic mentoring. Interact Learn Environ 22(2):221–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Arcy J, Devaraj S (2012) Employee misuse of information technology resources: testing a contemporary deterrence model. Decis Sci 43(6):1091–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Aguila-Obra A, Padilla-Melendez A (2008) Organizational factors affecting internet technology adoption. Internet Res 16(1):94–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delery JE, Doty DH (1996) Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: test of universalistic contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Acad Manag J 39(4):802–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devaraj S, Kholi R (2003) Performance impacts of information technology: is actual usage the missing link? Manag Sci 49(3):273–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C, Larcker FD (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox S (2000) Communities of practice, foucault and actor network theory. J Manag Stud 37(6):853–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu VC, Cao Q, Duan W (2012) Unified Modeling Language (UML) IT adoption—a holistic model of organizational capabilities perspective. Decis Support Syst 54(1):257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong W, Zhu K (2006) Migrating to Internet-based e-commerce: factors affecting e-commerce adoption and migration at the firm level. Inf Manag 43(2):204–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huy LV, Rowe F, Truex D, Huynh MQ (2012) An empirical study of determinants of e-commerce adoption in SMEs in Vietnam an economy in transition. J Glob Inf Manag 20(3):23–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joo J, Normatov I (2013) Determinants of collective intelligence quality: comparison between Wiki and Q&A services in English and Korean users. Serv Bus 7(4):687–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy M (2009) Web 2.0 implications on knowledge management. J Knowl Manag 13(1):120–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim S, Trimi S, Lee H (2010) Web 2.0 service adoption and entrepreneurial orientation. Serv Bus 4(3–4):197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Nicolas C, Soto-Acosta P (2010) Analyzing ICT adoption and use effects on knowledge creation: an empirical investigation in SMEs. Int J Inf Manag 30(6):521–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meroño-Cerdan A, Soto-Acosta P, Lopez-Nicolas C (2008a) Analyzing collaborative technologies’ effect on performance through intranet use orientations. J Enterp Inf Manag 21(1):39–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Meroño-Cerdan A, Soto-Acosta P, Lopez-Nicolas C (2008b) Analyzing collaborative technologies’ effect on performance through intranet use orientations. Int J E-Collab 4(4):33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan D, Dooley L (2010) Collaborative Innovation for the Management of Information Technology Resources. Int J Hum Cap Inf Technol Prof 1(1):16–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Z (2012) Opinions and networks: how do they effect each other. Comput Econ 39(2):157–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paroutis S, Al Saleh A (2009) Determinants of knowledge sharing using web 2.0 technologies. J Knowl Manag 13(4):52–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1985) Competitive advantage. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards D (2009) Social software/web 2.0 approach to collaborative knowledge engineering. Inf Sci 179(15):2515–2523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • San Martín S, López-Catalán B, Ramón-Jerónimo MA (2012) Factors determining firms’ perceived performance of mobile commerce. Ind Manag Data Syst 112(6):946–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigala M, Chalkiti K (2013) Investigating the exploitation of web 2.0 for knowledge management in the Greek tourism industry: an utilisation–importance analysis. Comput Hum Behav 30(1):800–812

    Google Scholar 

  • Soto-Acosta P, Meroño-Cerdan A (2008) Analyzing e-Business value creation from a resource-based perspective. Int J Inf Manag 28(1):49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto-Acosta P, Colomo-Palacios R, Perez-Gonzalez D (2011) Examining whether highly e-innovative firms are more e-effective. Informatica 35(4):481–488

  • Soto-Acosta P, Ramayah T, Popa S (2013) Explaining intention to use an enterprise resource planning system: a replication and extension. Tehnički vjesnik 20(3):397–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Thong JYL (1999) An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. J Manag Inf Syst 15(4):187–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky LG, Fleischer M (1990) The process of technological innovation. Lexington Books, Lexington, Lexington, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui AS, Pearce JL, Porter LW (1997) Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: does investment in employees pay off? Acad Manag J 40:1089–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valkokari K, Paasi J, Rantala T (2012) Managing Knowledge within networked innovation. Knowl Manag Res Pract 10(1):27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Ahmed P (2009) The moderating effect of the business strategic orientation on e-commerce adoption: evidence from UK family run SMEs. J Strateg Inf Syst 18(1):16–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YM, Wang YS, Yang YF (2010) Understanding the determinants of RFID adoption in the manufacturing industry. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 77:803–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xin JY, Ramayah T, Soto-Acosta P, Popa S, Ping TA (2014) Analyzing the use of the Web 2.0 for brand awareness and competitive advantage: An empirical study in the Malaysian hospitability industry. Inf Syst Manag 31(2):96–103

  • Youndt MA, Snell SA, Dean JW Jr, Lepak DP (1996) Human resource management, manufacturing strategy and firm performance. Acad Manag J 39(4):836–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu K, Kraemer K (2005) Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Inf Syst Res 16(1):61–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu K, Kraemer KL, Xu S, Dedrick J (2004) Information technology payoff in e-business environments: an international perspective on value creation of e-business in the financial services industry. J Manag Inf Syst 21(1):17–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu K, Kraemer KL, Xu S (2006) The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: a technology diffusion perspective on e-business. Manag Sci 52(10):1557–1576

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Soto-Acosta.

Appendix: Measures

Appendix: Measures

Variables

Description

Technology Integration

TI1

Extent to which the website is electronically integrated with back-end systems and databases (1–5)

IR2

Extent to which company databases are electronically integrated to that of business partners (clients, suppliers…) (1–5)

IT expertise (ITP)

Number of IT professionals (#)

Commitment-based HR practices

HR1

Employees’ interest are taken into account for decision-making (1–5)

HR2

Our company support employees willing to take further training (1–5)

HR3

Our company helps employees achieving work-life balance (1–5)

HR4

Selection processes are formalized and rigorous (1–5)

HR5

Our company has established career paths (1–5)

HR6

Promotion is based on objective criteria (seniority, objectives…) (1-5)

HR7

Performance appraisals are conducted on a regular basis (1–5)

HR8

Employees are informed about their performance appraisals (1–5)

Customer Power

Extent of pressure clients exert on purchasing conditions (1–5)

Supplier Power

Extent of pressure suppliers exert on purchasing conditions (1–5)

Web 2.0 use for Knowledge Sharing.

W2KS1

Extent to which the employees participate in organizational electronic discussion forums (1–5)

W2KS2

Extent to which Web 2.0 technologies are used for building collective knowledge (1–5)

W2KS3

Extent to which the employees upload information on organizational social networks or wikis (1–5)

  1. Note. (1–5): five-point Likert-type scales; (#): continuous variable

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soto-Acosta, P., Perez-Gonzalez, D. & Popa, S. Determinants of Web 2.0 technologies for knowledge sharing in SMEs. Serv Bus 8, 425–438 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-014-0247-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-014-0247-9

Keywords

Navigation