Abstract
Web 2.0 technologies are increasingly being used within all knowledge management processes. This paper extends previous studies on the use of internet technologies and knowledge management by analyzing factors affecting knowledge sharing through Web 2.0 technologies within small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Drawing upon the technology-organization-environment framework, a model is developed to examine how distinct contextual factors influence the use of Web 2.0 technologies for knowledge sharing. A data set of Spanish SMEs is used to test the conceptual model and hypotheses. Results show that knowledge sharing through Web 2.0 technologies emerges from internal organizational and technological resources rather than from external pressure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alavi M, Leidner DE (2001) Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Q 25(1):107–136
Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1998) On evaluation of structural equations models. J Acad Mark Sci 16(1):74–94
Bordonaba-Juste V, Lucia-Palacios L, Polo-Redondo Y (2012) Antecedents and consequences of e-business use for European retailers. Internet Res 22(5):532–550
Brislin RW (1980) Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In: Triandis HC, Berry JW (eds) Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, 2. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, pp 349–444
Chan FTS, Chong AY-L, Zhou L (2012) An empirical investigation of factors affecting e-collaboration diffusion in SMEs. Int J Prod Econ 138(2):329–344
Chong AYL, Ooi KB, Lin B, Tang SY (2009) Influence of interorganizational relationships on SMEs’ e-business adoption. Internet Res 19(3):313–331
Collins CJ, Smith KG (2006) Knowledge exchange and combination: the role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Acad Manag J 49(3):544–560
Colomo-Palacios R, Casado-Lumbreras C, Soto-Acosta P, Misra S, García-Peñalvo FJ (2012) Analyzing human resource management practices within the GSD context. J Glob Inf Technol Manag 15(3):30–54
Colomo-Palacios R, Casado-Lumbreras C, Soto-Acosta P, Misra S (2013) Providing knowledge recommendations: an approach for informal electronic mentoring. Interact Learn Environ 22(2):221–240
D’Arcy J, Devaraj S (2012) Employee misuse of information technology resources: testing a contemporary deterrence model. Decis Sci 43(6):1091–1124
Del Aguila-Obra A, Padilla-Melendez A (2008) Organizational factors affecting internet technology adoption. Internet Res 16(1):94–110
Delery JE, Doty DH (1996) Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: test of universalistic contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Acad Manag J 39(4):802–835
Devaraj S, Kholi R (2003) Performance impacts of information technology: is actual usage the missing link? Manag Sci 49(3):273–289
Fornell C, Larcker FD (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50
Fox S (2000) Communities of practice, foucault and actor network theory. J Manag Stud 37(6):853–867
Gu VC, Cao Q, Duan W (2012) Unified Modeling Language (UML) IT adoption—a holistic model of organizational capabilities perspective. Decis Support Syst 54(1):257–269
Hong W, Zhu K (2006) Migrating to Internet-based e-commerce: factors affecting e-commerce adoption and migration at the firm level. Inf Manag 43(2):204–221
Huy LV, Rowe F, Truex D, Huynh MQ (2012) An empirical study of determinants of e-commerce adoption in SMEs in Vietnam an economy in transition. J Glob Inf Manag 20(3):23–54
Joo J, Normatov I (2013) Determinants of collective intelligence quality: comparison between Wiki and Q&A services in English and Korean users. Serv Bus 7(4):687–711
Levy M (2009) Web 2.0 implications on knowledge management. J Knowl Manag 13(1):120–134
Lim S, Trimi S, Lee H (2010) Web 2.0 service adoption and entrepreneurial orientation. Serv Bus 4(3–4):197–207
Lopez-Nicolas C, Soto-Acosta P (2010) Analyzing ICT adoption and use effects on knowledge creation: an empirical investigation in SMEs. Int J Inf Manag 30(6):521–528
Meroño-Cerdan A, Soto-Acosta P, Lopez-Nicolas C (2008a) Analyzing collaborative technologies’ effect on performance through intranet use orientations. J Enterp Inf Manag 21(1):39–51
Meroño-Cerdan A, Soto-Acosta P, Lopez-Nicolas C (2008b) Analyzing collaborative technologies’ effect on performance through intranet use orientations. Int J E-Collab 4(4):33–50
O’Sullivan D, Dooley L (2010) Collaborative Innovation for the Management of Information Technology Resources. Int J Hum Cap Inf Technol Prof 1(1):16–30
Pan Z (2012) Opinions and networks: how do they effect each other. Comput Econ 39(2):157–171
Paroutis S, Al Saleh A (2009) Determinants of knowledge sharing using web 2.0 technologies. J Knowl Manag 13(4):52–63
Porter ME (1985) Competitive advantage. Free Press, New York
Richards D (2009) Social software/web 2.0 approach to collaborative knowledge engineering. Inf Sci 179(15):2515–2523
San Martín S, López-Catalán B, Ramón-Jerónimo MA (2012) Factors determining firms’ perceived performance of mobile commerce. Ind Manag Data Syst 112(6):946–963
Sigala M, Chalkiti K (2013) Investigating the exploitation of web 2.0 for knowledge management in the Greek tourism industry: an utilisation–importance analysis. Comput Hum Behav 30(1):800–812
Soto-Acosta P, Meroño-Cerdan A (2008) Analyzing e-Business value creation from a resource-based perspective. Int J Inf Manag 28(1):49–60
Soto-Acosta P, Colomo-Palacios R, Perez-Gonzalez D (2011) Examining whether highly e-innovative firms are more e-effective. Informatica 35(4):481–488
Soto-Acosta P, Ramayah T, Popa S (2013) Explaining intention to use an enterprise resource planning system: a replication and extension. Tehnički vjesnik 20(3):397–405
Thong JYL (1999) An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. J Manag Inf Syst 15(4):187–214
Tornatzky LG, Fleischer M (1990) The process of technological innovation. Lexington Books, Lexington, Lexington, MA
Tsui AS, Pearce JL, Porter LW (1997) Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: does investment in employees pay off? Acad Manag J 40:1089–1121
Valkokari K, Paasi J, Rantala T (2012) Managing Knowledge within networked innovation. Knowl Manag Res Pract 10(1):27–40
Wang Y, Ahmed P (2009) The moderating effect of the business strategic orientation on e-commerce adoption: evidence from UK family run SMEs. J Strateg Inf Syst 18(1):16–30
Wang YM, Wang YS, Yang YF (2010) Understanding the determinants of RFID adoption in the manufacturing industry. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 77:803–815
Xin JY, Ramayah T, Soto-Acosta P, Popa S, Ping TA (2014) Analyzing the use of the Web 2.0 for brand awareness and competitive advantage: An empirical study in the Malaysian hospitability industry. Inf Syst Manag 31(2):96–103
Youndt MA, Snell SA, Dean JW Jr, Lepak DP (1996) Human resource management, manufacturing strategy and firm performance. Acad Manag J 39(4):836–866
Zhu K, Kraemer K (2005) Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Inf Syst Res 16(1):61–84
Zhu K, Kraemer KL, Xu S, Dedrick J (2004) Information technology payoff in e-business environments: an international perspective on value creation of e-business in the financial services industry. J Manag Inf Syst 21(1):17–54
Zhu K, Kraemer KL, Xu S (2006) The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: a technology diffusion perspective on e-business. Manag Sci 52(10):1557–1576
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Measures
Appendix: Measures
Variables | Description |
---|---|
Technology Integration | |
TI1 | Extent to which the website is electronically integrated with back-end systems and databases (1–5) |
IR2 | Extent to which company databases are electronically integrated to that of business partners (clients, suppliers…) (1–5) |
IT expertise (ITP) | Number of IT professionals (#) |
Commitment-based HR practices | |
HR1 | Employees’ interest are taken into account for decision-making (1–5) |
HR2 | Our company support employees willing to take further training (1–5) |
HR3 | Our company helps employees achieving work-life balance (1–5) |
HR4 | Selection processes are formalized and rigorous (1–5) |
HR5 | Our company has established career paths (1–5) |
HR6 | Promotion is based on objective criteria (seniority, objectives…) (1-5) |
HR7 | Performance appraisals are conducted on a regular basis (1–5) |
HR8 | Employees are informed about their performance appraisals (1–5) |
Customer Power | Extent of pressure clients exert on purchasing conditions (1–5) |
Supplier Power | Extent of pressure suppliers exert on purchasing conditions (1–5) |
Web 2.0 use for Knowledge Sharing. | |
W2KS1 | Extent to which the employees participate in organizational electronic discussion forums (1–5) |
W2KS2 | Extent to which Web 2.0 technologies are used for building collective knowledge (1–5) |
W2KS3 | Extent to which the employees upload information on organizational social networks or wikis (1–5) |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Soto-Acosta, P., Perez-Gonzalez, D. & Popa, S. Determinants of Web 2.0 technologies for knowledge sharing in SMEs. Serv Bus 8, 425–438 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-014-0247-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-014-0247-9