Provider Perceptions of the Electronic Health Record Incentive Programs: A Survey of Eligible Professionals Who Have and Have Not Attested to Meaningful Use
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The HITECH Act of 2009 enabled the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to provide financial incentives to health care providers who demonstrate “meaningful use” (MU) of their electronic health records (EHRs). Despite stakeholder involvement in the rule-making phase, formal input about the MU program from a cross section of providers has not been reported since incentive payments began.
To examine the perspectives and experiences of a random sample of health care professionals eligible for financial incentives (eligible professionals or EPs) for demonstrating meaningful use of their EHRs. It was hypothesized that EPs actively participating in the MU program would generally view the purported benefits of MU more positively than EPs not yet participating in the incentive program.
Survey data were collected by mail from a random sample of EPs in Washington State and Idaho. Two follow-up mailings were made to non-respondents.
The sample included EPs who had registered for incentive payments or attested to MU (MU-Active) and EPs not yet participating in the incentive program (MU-Inactive).
The survey assessed perceptions of general realities and influences of MU on health care; views on the influence of MU on clinics; and personal views about MU. EP opinions were assessed with close- and open-ended items.
Close-ended responses indicated that MU-Active providers were generally more positive about the program than MU-Inactive providers. However, the majority of respondents in both groups felt that MU would not reduce care disparities or improve the accuracy of patient information. The additional workload on EPs and their staff was viewed as too great a burden on productivity relative to the level of reimbursement for achieving MU goals. The majority of open-ended responses in each group reinforced the general perception that the MU program diverted attention from treating patients by imposing greater reporting requirements.
Survey results indicate the need by CMS to step up engagement with EPs in future planning for the MU program, while also providing support for achieving MU standards.
- Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. NEJM. 2010;363:501–4. CrossRef
- Marcotte L, Seidman J, Trudel K, Berwick DM, Blumenthal D, Mostashari F, Jain SH. Achieving meaningful use of health information technology: a guide for physicians to the EHR incentive programs. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:731–6. CrossRef
- Boonstra A, Broekhuis M. Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:231. CrossRef
- Shachak A, Reis S. The impact of electronic medical records on patient-doctor communication during consultation: a narrative literature review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15:641–9. CrossRef
- Kissam SM, Banger AK, Dimitropoulos LL, Thompson CR. Barriers to meaningful use in Medicaid: analysis and recommendations. AHRQ Publication No. 12-0062-EF 2012. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
- Heisey-Grove D, Danehy LN, Consolazio M, Lynch K, Mostashari F. A national study of challenges to electronic health record adoption and meaningful use. Med Care. 2014;52:144–8. CrossRef
- King J, Patel V, Jamoom EW, Furukawa MF. Clinical benefits of electronic health record use: national findings. Health Serv Res. 2014;49:392–404. CrossRef
- Samal L, Wright A, Healey MJ, Linder JA, Bates DW. Meaningful use and quality of care. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:997–8. CrossRef
- Wright A, Feblowitz J, Samal L, McCoy AB, Sittig DF. The Medicare Electronic Health Record Incentive Program: provider performance on core and menu measures. Health Serv Res. 2014;49(1 Pt 2):325–46. CrossRef
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program. Final rule. Fed Regist. 2010;75:44313–588.
- Maxson E, Jain S, Kendall M, Mostashari F, Blumenthal D. The regional extension center program: helping physicians meaningfully use health information technology. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:666–70. CrossRef
- Field TS, Cadoret CA, Brown ML, Ford M, Greene SM, Hill D, Hornbrook MC, Meenan RT, White MJ, Zapka JM. Surveying physicians: do components of the “Total Design Approach” to optimizing survey response rates apply to physicians? Med Care. 2002;40:596–605. CrossRef
- Van Geest JB, Johnson TP, Welch VL. Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: a systematic review. Eval Health Prof. 2007;30:303–21. CrossRef
- Kellerman SE, Herold J. Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20:61–7. CrossRef
- Flanigan TS, McFarlane E, Cook S. Conducting survey research among physicians and other medical professionals: a review of current literature. ASA Proc Sect Surv Res Methods. 2008:4136–47.
- James KM, Ziegenfuss JY, Tilburt JC, Harris AM, Beebe TJ. Getting physicians to respond: the impact of incentive type and timing on physician survey response rates. Health Serv Res. 2011;46:232–42. CrossRef
- Ziegenfuss JY, Burmeister K, James KM, Haas L, Tilburt JC, Beebe TJ. Getting physicians to open the survey: little evidence that an envelope teaser increases response rates. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:41. CrossRef
- Healthdata.gov (accessed August 13, 2014). http://healthdata.gov/data/dataset/cms-medicare-and-medicaid-ehr-incentive-program-electronic-health-record-products-used.
- Provider Perceptions of the Electronic Health Record Incentive Programs: A Survey of Eligible Professionals Who Have and Have Not Attested to Meaningful Use
Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- meaningful use
- eligible professional
- electronic health record
- health care reform
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Inland Northwest Health Services, 711 S. Cowley St., Spokane, WA, 99202, USA
- 2. Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
- 3. Qualis Health, Seattle, WA, USA
- 4. University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA