Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 29, Issue 11, pp 1528–1528

Capsule Commentary on Lewis et al., Innovation in the Safety Net: Integrating Community Health Centers Through Accountable Care

Capsule Commentary

DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-2973-z

Cite this article as:
Maust, D.T. J GEN INTERN MED (2014) 29: 1528. doi:10.1007/s11606-014-2973-z

Lewis et al.1 explore to what extent community health centers (CHCs) are being incorporated into accountable care organizations (ACOs). CHCs play a large role in caring for underserved communities and vulnerable populations, yet they are often segmented from other health care providers. The authors suggest ACOs could provide a mechanism through which CHCs integrate with other providers.

This work is notable simply for that fact that it is actual data provided by real ACOs. Since passage of the Affordable Care Act, thought pieces have extolled the virtues of ACOs for their potential to reorganize payment and care delivery to achieve the triple aim of better care and better health at a lower cost.2 Publications have examined market features associated with ACO formation3 and care in ACO-like healthcare systems,4 but there have been few analyses published using either data provided by an ACO or about actual ACO patient populations.

Therefore, the work of Lewis et al. is a rare example of information collected from actual ACOs. They start with the National Survey of ACOs, which includes all ACOs in the United States as of August 2012, including both federal and commercial payers. Of 292 potentially eligible organizations, 173 (70 %) provided information about organizational characteristics; 18 participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. The authors find that 28 % of ACOs include a CHC and are largely similar to non-CHC ACOs in terms of organization, size, and capabilities. In addition, ACO+CHCs had more experience with patient-centered medical homes, public reporting and risk bearing. Ultimately, the qualitative interviews suggest that CHCs were seen as helping their respective ACOs through their expertise in primary care transformation and caring for high-need patients, both areas likely critical for ACO success.

The authors note that it is not possible to determine causality and know whether these relationships would have developed outside of ACO-specific initiatives. Regardless, the ACO experiment is an important one occurring in health policy right now. Understanding baseline characteristics is an important first step, but ongoing analyses that can help both define and then understand success and failure will be critical.

Conflict of Interest

The author has no conflicts of interest with any of the material in this manuscript.

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA