Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 29, Issue 11, pp 1460–1467

The Care Transitions Innovation (C-TraIn) for Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Adults: Results of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors

    • Department of MedicineOregon Health & Science University
    • Old Town Clinic, Central City Concern
  • Leann Michaels
    • Oregon Rural Practice-based Research NetworkOregon Health & Science University
  • Benjamin Chan
    • Center for Health Systems EffectivenessOregon Health & Science University
  • Devan Kansagara
    • Department of MedicineOregon Health & Science University
    • Department of MedicineVeterans Affairs Medical Center
Original Research

DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-2903-0

Cite this article as:
Englander, H., Michaels, L., Chan, B. et al. J GEN INTERN MED (2014) 29: 1460. doi:10.1007/s11606-014-2903-0

Abstract

Background

Despite growing emphasis on transitional care to reduce costs and improve quality, few studies have examined transitional care improvements in socioeconomically disadvantaged adults. It is important to consider these patients separately as many are high-utilizers, have different needs, and may have different responses to interventions.

Objective

To evaluate the impact of a multicomponent transitional care improvement program on 30-day readmissions, emergency department (ED) use, transitional care quality, and mortality.

Design

Clustered randomized controlled trial conducted at a single urban academic medical center in Portland, Oregon.

Participants

Three hundred eighty-two hospitalized low-income adults admitted to general medicine or cardiology who were uninsured or had public insurance.

Intervention

Multicomponent intervention including (1) transitional nurse coaching and education, including home visits for highest risk patients; (2) pharmacy care, including provision of 30 days of medications after discharge for those without prescription drug coverage; (3) post-hospital primary care linkages; (4) systems integration and continuous quality improvement.

Measurements

Primary outcomes included 30-day inpatient readmission and ED use. Readmission data were obtained using state-wide administrative data for all participants (insured and uninsured). Secondary outcomes included quality (3-item Care Transitions Measure) and mortality. Research staff administering questionnaires and assessing outcomes were blinded.

Results

There was no significant difference in 30-day readmission between C-TraIn (30/209, 14.4 %) and control patients (27/173, 16.1 %), p = 0.644, or in ED visits between C-TraIn (51/209, 24.4 %) and control (33/173, 19.6 %), p = 0.271. C-TraIn was associated with improved transitional care quality; 47.3 % (71/150) of C-TraIn patients reported a high quality transition compared to 30.3 % (36/119) control patients, odds ratio 2.17 (95 % CI 1.30–3.64). Zero C-TraIn patients died in the 30-day post-discharge period compared with five in the control group (unadjusted p = 0.02).

Conclusions

C-TraIn did not reduce 30-day inpatient readmissions or ED use; however, it improved transitional care quality.

KEY WORDS

care transitionspatient readmissionunderserved populationshealth care reform

Supplementary material

11606_2014_2903_MOESM1_ESM.docx (87 kb)
ESM 1(PDF 87.0 KB)

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2014