Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening: How Many Life Years Lost from Underuse of the Medicare Screening Benefit?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Since 2007, Medicare has provided one-time abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening for men with smoking history, and men and women with a family history of AAA as part of its Welcome to Medicare visit.
We examined utilization of the new AAA screening benefit and estimated how increased utilization could influence population health as measured by life years gained. Additionally, we explored the impact of expanding screening to women with smoking history.
Analysis of Medicare claims and a simulation model to estimate the effects of screening, using published data for parameter estimates.
AAA screening in the primary care setting.
Newly-enrolled Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years, with smoking history or family history of AAA.
Life expectancy, 10-year survival rates.
Medicare data revealed low utilization of AAA screening, under 1 % among those eligible. We estimate that screening could increase life expectancy per individual invited to screening for men with smoking history (0.11 years), with family history of AAA (0.17 years), and women with family history (0.08 years), and smoking history (0.09 years). Average gains of 131 life years per 1,000 persons screened for AAA compare favorably with the grade B United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation for breast cancer screening, which yields 95–128 life years per 1,000 women screened. These findings were robust over a range of scenarios.
The simulation results reflect assumptions regarding AAA prevalence, treatment, and outcomes in specific populations based on published research and US survey data. Published data on women were limited.
The Welcome to Medicare and AAA screening benefits have been underutilized. Increasing utilization of AAA screening would yield substantial gains in life expectancy. Expanding screening to women with smoking history also has the potential for substantial health benefits.
- Thompson, SG, Ashton, HA, Gao, L, Scott, RA (2009) Screening men for abdominal aortic aneurysm: 10-year mortality and cost effectiveness results from the randomised Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study. BMJ 338: pp. b2307 CrossRef
- Wanhainen, A, Lundkvist, J, Bergqvist, D, Bjorck, M (2005) Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 41: pp. 741-751 CrossRef
- Giardina, S, Pane, B, Spinella, G (2011) An economic evaluation of an abdominal aortic aneurysm screening program in Italy. J Vasc Surg 54: pp. 938-946 CrossRef
- Ehlers, L, Overvad, K, Sorensen, J, Christensen, S, Bech, M, Kjolby, M (2009) Analysis of cost effectiveness of screening Danish men aged 65 for abdominal aortic aneurysm. BMJ 338: pp. b2243 CrossRef
- Kim, LG, Thompson, SG, Briggs, AH, Buxton, MJ, Campbell, HE (2007) How cost-effective is screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms?. J Med Screen 14: pp. 46-52 CrossRef
- Fiegl C. Medicare's missed checkups: Few seniors get wellness exam. American Medical News. 2011.
- Shreibati JB, Baker LC, Hlatky MA, Mell MW. Impact of the Screening Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Very Efficiently (SAAAVE) Act on Abdominal Ultrasonography Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries. Arch Intern Med. 2012;1–7.
- Fleming, C, Whitlock, EP, Beil, TL, Lederle, FA (2005) Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a best-evidence systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 142: pp. 203-211 CrossRef
- Scott, RA, Wilson, NM, Ashton, HA, Kay, DN (1995) Influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 5-year results of a randomized controlled study. Br J Surg 82: pp. 1066-1070 CrossRef
- Norman, PE, Powell, JT (2007) Abdominal aortic aneurysm: the prognosis in women is worse than in men. Circulation 115: pp. 2865-2869 CrossRef
- Lederle, FA, Larson, JC, Margolis, KL (2008) Abdominal aortic aneurysm events in the women’s health initiative: cohort study. BMJ 337: pp. a1724 CrossRef
- McPhee, JT, Hill, JS, Eslami, MH (2007) The impact of gender on presentation, therapy, and mortality of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the United States, 2001–2004. J Vasc Surg 45: pp. 891-899 CrossRef
- Sweeting, MJ, Thompson, SG, Brown, LC, Powell, JT (2012) Meta-analysis of individual patient data to examine factors affecting growth and rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg 99: pp. 655-665 CrossRef
- Lederle, FA (2008) Should abdominal aortic aneurysm be managed differently in women?. Scand J Surg 97: pp. 125-127
- Wanhainen, A, Lundkvist, J, Bergqvist, D, Björck, M (2006) Cost-effectiveness of screening women for abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 43: pp. 908-914 CrossRef
- Lederle, FA, Johnson, GR, Wilson, SE (2001) Abdominal aortic aneurysm in women. J Vasc Surg 34: pp. 122-126 CrossRef
- Ashton, HA, Buxton, MJ, Day, NE (2002) The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 360: pp. 1531-1539 CrossRef
- Lee, TY, Korn, P, Heller, JA (2002) The cost-effectiveness of a “quick-screen” program for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Surgery 132: pp. 399-407 CrossRef
- cost effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms based on four year results from randomised controlled trial. BMJ 325: pp. 1135 CrossRef
- Taylor, DH, Hasselblad, V, Henley, SJ, Thun, MJ, Sloan, FA (2002) Benefits of smoking cessation for longevity. Am J Public Health 92: pp. 990-996 CrossRef
- Woloshin, S, Schwartz, LM, Welch, HG (2008) The risk of death by age, sex, and smoking status in the United States: putting health risks in context. J Natl Cancer Inst 100: pp. 845-853 CrossRef
- Lederle, FA, Johnson, GR, Wilson, SE (1997) Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Ann Intern Med 126: pp. 441-449 CrossRef
- Increase Utilization of Preventive Services in Medicare and Medicaid. 2012. Accessed 3-2-2014 at http://www.prevent.org/Prevention-Policy-Agenda-for-the-110th-Congress/Increase-Utilization-of-Preventive-Services-in-Medicare-and-Medicaid.aspx.
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Free Preventive Services for People in Medicare: 5.5 Million Americans on Medicare Have Used Preventive Benefits. 2011. Accessed 3-2-2014 at http://downloads.cms.gov/files/preventionreport.pdf.
- Mandelblatt, JS, Cronin, KA, Bailey, S (2009) Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms. Ann Intern Med 151: pp. 738-747 CrossRef
- Cohen, JT, Neumann, PJ, Weinstein, MC (2008) Does preventive care save money? Health economics and the presidential candidates. N Engl J Med 358: pp. 661-663 CrossRef
- Neumann PJ, Cohen JT. Cost savings and cost-effectiveness of clinical preventive care. Synth Proj Res Synth Rep. 2009.
- Kent, KC, Zwolak, RM, Egorova, NN (2010) Analysis of risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a cohort of more than 3 million individuals. J Vasc Surg 52: pp. 539-548 CrossRef
- Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening: How Many Life Years Lost from Underuse of the Medicare Screening Benefit?
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 29, Issue 8 , pp 1155-1161
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- abdominal aortic aneurysm
- health policy
- health services research
- Industry Sectors