Specialties Differ in Which Aspects of Doctor Communication Predict Overall Physician Ratings
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Effective doctor communication is critical to positive doctor–patient relationships and predicts better health outcomes. Doctor communication is the strongest predictor of patient ratings of doctors, but the most important aspects of communication may vary by specialty.
To determine the importance of five aspects of doctor communication to overall physician ratings by specialty.
For each of 28 specialties, we calculated partial correlations of five communication items with a 0–10 overall physician rating, controlling for patient demographics.
Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group (CG-CAHPS®) 12-month Survey data collected 2005–2009 from 58,251 adults at a 534-physician medical group.
CG-CAHPS includes a 0 (“Worst physician possible”) to 10 (“Best physician possible”) overall physician rating. Five doctor communication items assess how often the physician: explains things; listens carefully; gives easy-to-understand instructions; shows respect; and spends enough time.
Physician showing respect was the most important aspect of communication for 23/28 specialties, with a mean partial correlation (0.27, ranging from 0.07 to 0.44 across specialties) that accounted for more than four times as much variance in the overall physician rating as any other communication item. Three of five communication items varied significantly across specialties in their associations with the overall rating (p < 0.05).
All patients valued respectful treatment; the importance of other aspects of communication varied significantly by specialty. Quality improvement efforts by all specialties should emphasize physicians showing respect to patients, and each specialty should also target other aspects of communication that matter most to their patients. The results have implications for improving provider quality improvement and incentive programs and the reporting of CAHPS data to patients. Specialists make important contributions to coordinated patient care, and thus customized approaches to measurement, reporting, and quality improvement efforts are important.
- Hulsman RL, Ros WJ, Winnubst JA, Bensing JM. Teaching clinically experienced physicians communication skills. A review of evaluation studies. Med Educ. 1999;33(9):655–668. CrossRef
- Beck R, Daughtridge R, Sloane P. Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Med. 2002;15(1):25–38.
- Epstein RM, Franks P, Fiscella K, Shields CG, Meldrum SC, Kravitz RL, et al. Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(7):1516–1528. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.02.001. CrossRef
- Beach M, Inui T. Relationship-centered care: a constructive reframing. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(S1):S3–S8. CrossRef
- Roter DL. Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction. Satisfaction and compliance. Health Educ Monogr. 1977;5(4):281–315. CrossRef
- Bartlett E, Grayson M, Barker R, Levine D, Golden A, Libber S. The effects of physician communications skills on patient satisfaction; recall, and adherence. J Chronic Dis. 1984;37(9–10):755–764. CrossRef
- Hargraves JL, Hays RD, Cleary PD. Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) 2.0 adult core survey. Health Serv Res. 2003;38(6 Pt 1):1509–1527. CrossRef
- Tallman K, Janisse T, Frankel RM, Sung SH, Krupat E, Hsu JT. Communication practices of physicians with high patient-satisfaction ratings. Perm J. 2007;11(1):19–29. CrossRef
- Wilkins V, Elliott MN, Richardson A, Lozano P, Mangione-Smith R. The association between care experiences and parent ratings of care for different racial, ethnic, and language groups in a Medicaid population. Health Serv Res. 2011;46(3):821–839. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01234.x. CrossRef
- Ruiz-Moral R, Perez Rodriguez E, Perula de Torres LA, de la Torre J. Physician-patient communication: a study on the observed behaviours of specialty physicians and the ways their patients perceive them. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64(1–3):242–248. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.02.010. CrossRef
- Sofaer S, Crofton C, Goldstein E, Hoy E, Crabb J. What do consumers want to know about the quality of care in hospitals? Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6 Pt 2):2018–2036. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00473.x. CrossRef
- Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware JE Jr, Yano EM, Frank HJ. Patients’ participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3(5):448–457. CrossRef
- Roter D, Hall JA. Doctors talking with patients/patients talking with doctors : improving communication in medical visits. Westport, Conn: Auburn House; 1992.
- Franks P, Jerant AF, Fiscella K, Shields CG, Tancredi DJ, Epstein RM. Studying physician effects on patient outcomes: physician interactional style and performance on quality of care indicators. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(2):422–432. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.05.027. CrossRef
- Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;152(9):1423–1433.
- Stewart M, Brown JB, Boon H, Galajda J, Meredith L, Sangster M. Evidence on patient-doctor communication. Cancer Prev Control. 1999;3(1):25–30.
- Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet. 2001;357(9258):757–762. CrossRef
- Nagy V. Clinician–patient communication: its big impact on health. Perm J. 2001;5(4):45–47.
- Murphy KM, Nash DB. Nonprimary care physicians’ views on office-based quality incentive and improvement programs. Am J Med Qual. 2008;23(6):427–439. doi:10.1177/1062860608324557. CrossRef
- Rodriguez HP, von Glahn T, Chang H, Rogers WH, Safran DG. Measuring patients’ experiences with individual specialist physicians and their practices. Am J Med Qual. 2009;24(1):35–44. doi:10.1177/1062860608326418. CrossRef
- Collier DA, Collier CE, Kelly TM. Benchmarking physician performance, part 1. J Med Pract Manage. 2006;21(4):185–189.
- Darby C, Hays RD, Kletke P. Development and evaluation of the CAHPS hospital survey. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6 Pt 2):1973–1976. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00490.x. CrossRef
- Goldstein E, Farquhar M, Crofton C, Darby C, Garfinkel S. Measuring hospital care from the patients’ perspective: an overview of the CAHPS hospital survey development process. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6 Pt 2):1977–1995. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00477.x. CrossRef
- Hays RD, Shaul JA, Williams VS, Lubalin JS, Harris-Kojetin LD, Sweeny SF, et al. Psychometric properties of the CAHPS 1.0 survey measures. Consumer assessment of health plans study. Med Care. 1999;37(3 Suppl):MS22–MS31.
- Keller S, O’Malley AJ, Hays RD, Matthew RA, Zaslavsky AM, Hepner KA, et al. Methods used to streamline the CAHPS hospital survey. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6 Pt 2):2057–2077. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00478.x. CrossRef
- Hays RD, Chong K, Brown J, Spritzer KL, Horne K. Patient reports and ratings of individual physicians: an evaluation of the doctor guide and consumer assessment of health plans study provider-level surveys. Am J Med Qual. 2003;18(5):190–196. CrossRef
- Solomon LS, Hays RD, Zaslavsky AM, Ding L, Cleary PD. Psychometric properties of a group-level Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) instrument. Med Care. 2005;43(1):53–60.
- Friedberg MW, Safran DG, Coltin K, Dresser M, Schneider EC. Paying for performance in primary care: potential impact on practices and disparities. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(5):926–932. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0985. CrossRef
- Freed GL, Uren RL. Pay-for-performance: an overview for pediatrics. J Pediatr. 2006;149(1):120–124. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.03.023. CrossRef
- Kahn JM, Scales DC, Au DH, Carson SS, Curtis JR, Dudley RA, et al. An official American Thoracic Society Policy statement: pay-for-performance in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181(7):752–761. doi:10.1164/rccm.200903-0450ST. CrossRef
- Podratz KC. Quality improvement in gynecologic surgery: the new frontier. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(4):891–895. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.08.012. CrossRef
- Audet AM, Davis K, Schoenbaum SC. Adoption of patient-centered care practices by physicians: results from a national survey. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(7):754–759. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.7.754. CrossRef
- Greenberg JO, Dudley JC, Ferris TG. Engaging specialists in performance-incentive programs. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(17):1558–1560. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1000650. CrossRef
- Sledge WH, Feinstein AR. A clinimetric approach to the components of the patient-physician relationship. JAMA: J Am Med Assoc. 1997;278(23):2043–2048. CrossRef
- Safran DG, Karp M, Coltin K, Chang H, Li A, Ogren J, et al. Measuring patients’ experiences with individual primary care physicians. Results of a statewide demonstration project. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(1):13–21. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00311.x. CrossRef
- O’Malley AJ, Zaslavsky AM, Elliott MN, Zaborski L, Cleary PD. Case-mix adjustment of the CAHPS hospital survey. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6 Pt 2):2162–2181. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00470.x. CrossRef
- Martino SC, Elliott MN, Cleary PD, Kanouse DE, Brown JA, Spritzer KL, et al. Psychometric properties of an instrument to assess medicare beneficiaries’ prescription drug plan experiences. Health Care Financ Rev. 2009;30(3):41–53.
- White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica. 1980;48(4):817–838. CrossRef
- Williams RL. A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics. 2000;56(2):645–646. CrossRef
- Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155–159. CrossRef
- Elliott MN, Haviland AM, Kanouse DE, Hambarsoomian K, Hays RD. Adjusting for subgroup differences in extreme response tendency in ratings of health care: impact on disparity estimates. Health Serv Res. 2009;44(2 Pt 1):542–561. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00922.x. CrossRef
- Chen L. Testing the mean of skewed distributions. J Am Stat Assoc. 1995;90(430):567–576. CrossRef
- Elliott MN, Lehrman WG, Goldstein E, Hambarsoomian K, Beckett MK, Giordano LA. Do hospitals rank differently on HCAHPS for different patient subgroups? Med Care Res Rev. 2010;67(1):56–73. doi:10.1177/1077558709339066. CrossRef
- Adams J, Mehrotra A, Thomas JW, McGlynn EA. Physician cost profiling—reliability and risk of misclassification. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(11):1014–1021. CrossRef
- Elliott MN, Kanouse DE, Edwards CA, Hilborne LH. Components of care vary in importance for overall patient-reported experience by type of hospitalization. Med Care. 2009;47(8):842–849. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318197b22a. CrossRef
- Kutney-Lee A, McHugh MD, Sloane DM, Cimiotti JP, Flynn L, Neff DF, et al. Nursing: a key to patient satisfaction. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(4):w669–w677. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.w669. CrossRef
- Leigh JP, Tancredi D, Jerant A, Kravitz RL. Annual work hours across physician specialties. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(13):1211–1213. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.294. CrossRef
- Hardee JT, Kasper IK. A clinical communication strategy to enhance effectiveness and CAHPS scores: the ALERT model. Perm J. 2008;12(3):70–74.
- Ngo-Metzger Q, Telfair J, Sorkin D, Weidmer B, Weech-Maldonado R, Hurtado M, et al. Cultural competency and quality of care: obtaining the patient’s perspective. New York, NY: Commonwealth Fund 2006 Contract No.: 963.
- Weech-Maldonado R, Elliott M, Pradhan R, Schiller C, Hall A, Hays RD. Can hospital cultural competency reduce disparities in patient experiences with care? Med Care. 2012;50(Suppl):S48–S55. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182610ad1. CrossRef
- Goldstein E, Elliott MN, Lehrman WG, Hambarsoomian K, Giordano LA. Racial/ethnic differences in patients’ perceptions of inpatient care using the HCAHPS survey. Med Care Res Rev. 2010;67(1):74–92. doi:10.1177/1077558709341066. CrossRef
- Roland M, Elliott M, Lyratzopoulos G, Barbiere J, Parker RA, Smith P, et al. Reliability of patient responses in pay for performance schemes: analysis of national general practitioner patient survey data in England. BMJ. 2009;339:b3851. doi:10.1136/bmj.b3851. CrossRef
- Groves R, Peytcheva E. The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias: a meta-analysis. Public Opin Q. 2008;72(2):167–189. CrossRef
- Klein DJ, Elliott MN, Haviland AM, Saliba D, Burkhart Q, Edwards C, et al. Understanding nonresponse to the 2007 Medicare CAHPS survey. The Gerontologist. 2011;51(6):843–855. CrossRef
- Elliott MN, Zaslavsky AM, Goldstein E, Lehrman W, Hambarsoomians K, Beckett MK, et al. Effects of survey mode, patient mix, and nonresponse on CAHPS hospital survey scores. Health Serv Res. 2009;44(2 Pt 1):501–518. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00914.x. CrossRef
- Elliott MN, Edwards C, Angeles J, Hambarsoomians K, Hays RD. Patterns of unit and item nonresponse in the CAHPS hospital survey. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6 Pt 2):2096–2119. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00476.x. CrossRef
- Quigley DD, Martino SC, Brown JA, Hays RD. Evaluating the content of the communication items in the CAHPS(®) clinician and group survey and supplemental items with what high-performing physicians say they do. Patient. 2013;6(3):169–177. CrossRef
- Specialties Differ in Which Aspects of Doctor Communication Predict Overall Physician Ratings
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 29, Issue 3 , pp 447-454
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- doctor–patient relationship
- specialty care
- quality improvement
- patient satisfaction
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. RAND Corporation, 1776 Main St., Santa Monica, CA, 90401, USA
- 2. UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, Los Angeles, CA, USA