Impact of Electronic Health Records on Malpractice Claims in a Sample of Physician Offices in Colorado: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Electronic health records (EHRs) might reduce medical liability claims and potentially justify premium credits from liability insurers, but the evidence is limited.
To evaluate the association between EHR use and medical liability claims in a population of office-based physicians, including claims that could potentially be directly prevented by features available in EHRs (“EHR-sensitive” claims).
Retrospective cohort study of medical liability claims and analysis of claim abstracts.
The 26 % of Colorado office-based physicians insured through COPIC Insurance Company who responded to a survey on EHR use (894 respondents out of 3,502 invitees).
Claims incidence rate ratio (IRR); prevalence of “EHR-sensitive” claims.
473 physicians (53 % of respondents) used an office-based EHR. After adjustment for sex, birth cohort, specialty, practice setting and use of an EHR in settings other than an office, IRR for all claims was not significantly different between EHR users and non-users (0.88, 95 % CI 0.52–1.46; p = 0.61), or for users after EHR implementation as compared to before (0.73, 95 % CI 0.41–1.29; p = 0.28). Of 1,569 claim abstracts reviewed, 3 % were judged “Plausibly EHR-sensitive,” 82 % “Unlikely EHR-sensitive,” and 15 % “Unable to determine.” EHR-sensitive claims occurred in six out of 633 non-users and two out of 251 EHR users. Incidence rate ratios were 0.01 for both groups.
Colorado physicians using office-based EHRs did not have significantly different rates of liability claims than non-EHR users; nor were rates different for EHR users before and after EHR implementation. The lack of significant effect may be due to a low prevalence of EHR-sensitive claims. Further research on EHR use and medical liability across a larger population of physicians is warranted.
- Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, 42 U.S.C. § 17921 et seq.(2009).
- Hsiao C-J HE, Socey TC, Cai B. Electronic medical record/Electronic health record systems of office-based physicians: United States, 2009 and Preliminary 2010 State Estimates. Health E-Stat. 2010.
- Amarasingham R, Plantinga L, Diener-West M, Gaskin DJ, Powe NR. Clinical information technologies and inpatient outcomes: a multiple hospital study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(2):108–114. CrossRef
- Bright TJ WA, Dhurjati R, et al. Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(1):29–43. CrossRef
- Dorr D, Bonner LM, Cohen AN, et al. Informatics systems to promote improved care for chronic illness: a literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(2):156–163. CrossRef
- Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1223–1238. CrossRef
- Goodman C. Savings in electronic medical record systems? Do it for the quality. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(5):1124–1126. CrossRef
- Linder JA, Ma J, Bates DW, Middleton B, Stafford RS. Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(13):1400–1405. CrossRef
- Aspden PCJ, Wolcott J, Erickson SM, Eds. Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, The National Academies Press: 2004.
- Himmelstein DU, Wright A, Woolhandler S. Hospital computing and the costs and quality of care: a national study. Am J Med. 2010;123(1):40–46. CrossRef
- Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A, et al. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(5):1103–1117. CrossRef
- Miller RH, West C, Brown TM, Sim I, Ganchoff C. The value of electronic health records in solo or small group practices. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(5):1127–1137. CrossRef
- Medical Records Institute. Press Release. http://www.profrisk.com/PDFs/PressRelease-MRI.pdf. Accessed 10/19/2012.
- Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1197–1203. CrossRef
- Hoffman S, Podgurski A. E-Health hazards: provider liability and electronic health record systems. Berkeley Technol Law J. 2009. 2010; 24(4):1524.
- Han YY, Carcillo JA, Venkataraman ST, et al. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics. 2005;116(6):1506–1512. CrossRef
- Miller, A.R.T.C. Electronic discovery and electronic medical records: Does the threat of litigation affect firm decisions to adopt technology? 2010. http://www.ftc.gov/be/seminardocs/090430amiller.pdf. Accessed 10/19/2012.
- CMIC. CMIC, a physician-owned liability carrier in Connecticut offers policyholders a potential 5 % credit if their medical practice utilizes a CCHIT certified EHR. 2009.
- Virapongse A, Bates DW, Shi P, et al. Electronic health records and malpractice claims in office practice. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(21):2362–2367. CrossRef
- Quinn MAKA, Kleinman K, Bates DW, Simon, SR. The Relationship Between Electronic Health Records and Malpractice Claims. Arch Intern Med. 2012;E1–E2.
- Gallagher TH, Studdert D, Levinson W. Disclosing harmful medical errors to patients. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(26):2713–2719. CrossRef
- Mello MM, Gallagher TH. Malpractice reform–opportunities for leadership by health care institutions and liability insurers. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(15):1353–1356. CrossRef
- Mangalmurti SS, Murtagh L, Mello MM. Medical malpractice liability in the age of electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(21):2060–2067. CrossRef
- Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, et al. Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(16):1628–1638. CrossRef
- Blumenthal DDC, Donelan K, Ferris T, Jha A, Kaushal R, Rao S, Rosenbaum S, Shield A. Health Information Technology in the United States: The Information Base for Progress. Princeton: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2006.
- Jena AB SS, Lakdawalla D, Chandra A. Malpractice risk according to physician specialty. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:629–636. CrossRef
- J H. Order Interrupted by Text: Multitasking Mishap Morbidity and Mortality Rounds on the Web 2011; http://webmm.ahrq.gov/case.aspx?caseID=257. Accessed 10/19/2012.
- Impact of Electronic Health Records on Malpractice Claims in a Sample of Physician Offices in Colorado: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 28, Issue 5 , pp 637-644
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- electronic health records
- professional liability
- office-based practice
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 5195 E. Weaver Dr., Centennial, CO, 80121-3500, USA
- 2. Pricare, Inc., Larkspur, CO, USA
- 3. Colorado Health Outcomes Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- 4. Department of Health Systems, Management and Policy, Colorado School of Public Health, Colorado Health Outcomes Program, University of Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA
- 5. Department of Health Systems, Management and Policy, Colorado School of Public Health, Colorado Health Outcomes Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA